Collaborative validation of the quantification method for 57 allergens in ready to inject fragrance samples

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Christophe Pérès, Elise Corbi, Nathalie David, Jér?me Masson, Esmeralda Cicchetti, Nikolai Kupfermann, Gryta Kuropka, Nicolas Tacnet, Nick Roach, Anne-Marie Delac?te, Ga?l Gervais, Christine Schippa, Merixtell Ventura, Philippe Merle
{"title":"Collaborative validation of the quantification method for 57 allergens in ready to inject fragrance samples","authors":"Christophe Pérès,&nbsp;Elise Corbi,&nbsp;Nathalie David,&nbsp;Jér?me Masson,&nbsp;Esmeralda Cicchetti,&nbsp;Nikolai Kupfermann,&nbsp;Gryta Kuropka,&nbsp;Nicolas Tacnet,&nbsp;Nick Roach,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Delac?te,&nbsp;Ga?l Gervais,&nbsp;Christine Schippa,&nbsp;Merixtell Ventura,&nbsp;Philippe Merle","doi":"10.1002/ffj.3761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This publication presents the collaborative work conducted in CEN/TC 347/WG4 ‘Fragrance and colophony’ working group to evaluate the robustness of a GC–MS analytical methodology to quantify the extended list of 57 fragrance allergens in ‘ready to inject’ samples. The intention of this group was to provide an updated and consensual standard for the quantification of the extended allergen list. The analytical approach was based on the similar methodology than the original one developed for the 26 allergens, using a universal GC–MS simple quadrupole instrument. A ring test was performed among the different end-user experiences of the CEN group to test the method on a representative fragrance matrix. Accuracy profile method was used to validate the analytical method within the 2–240 mg/kg concentration range. Thanks to the use of commercial standard mixes and dedicated automation of decisional tree for data treatment, 89% of tolerance intervals of targeted allergens were included into the acceptance limits in the whole 2–240 mg/kg concentration range. The objective of this article was to provide some complementary data to implement the NF EN 16274 standard in an analytical laboratory and to highlight the inherent difficulties linked to extended data treatment and complexity for the recovery of low concentration analytes and potential coelutions in a wide diversity of ready-to inject samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":170,"journal":{"name":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","volume":"38 6","pages":"464-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffj.3761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This publication presents the collaborative work conducted in CEN/TC 347/WG4 ‘Fragrance and colophony’ working group to evaluate the robustness of a GC–MS analytical methodology to quantify the extended list of 57 fragrance allergens in ‘ready to inject’ samples. The intention of this group was to provide an updated and consensual standard for the quantification of the extended allergen list. The analytical approach was based on the similar methodology than the original one developed for the 26 allergens, using a universal GC–MS simple quadrupole instrument. A ring test was performed among the different end-user experiences of the CEN group to test the method on a representative fragrance matrix. Accuracy profile method was used to validate the analytical method within the 2–240 mg/kg concentration range. Thanks to the use of commercial standard mixes and dedicated automation of decisional tree for data treatment, 89% of tolerance intervals of targeted allergens were included into the acceptance limits in the whole 2–240 mg/kg concentration range. The objective of this article was to provide some complementary data to implement the NF EN 16274 standard in an analytical laboratory and to highlight the inherent difficulties linked to extended data treatment and complexity for the recovery of low concentration analytes and potential coelutions in a wide diversity of ready-to inject samples.

Abstract Image

注射用香料样品中57种过敏原定量方法的协同验证
本出版物介绍了CEN/TC 347/WG4“香料和树脂”工作组开展的合作工作,以评估GC–MS分析方法的稳健性,从而量化“即注射”样品中57种香料过敏原的扩展列表。该小组的目的是为扩大过敏原清单的量化提供一个更新的、一致同意的标准。该分析方法基于与最初为26种过敏原开发的方法相似的方法,使用通用的GC–MS简单四极仪。在CEN小组的不同最终用户体验中进行了环测试,以在具有代表性的香料基质上测试该方法。精度剖面法用于验证2–240范围内的分析方法 mg/kg浓度范围。由于使用了商业标准混合物和用于数据处理的决策树的专用自动化,在整个2-240中,89%的靶向过敏原耐受区间被纳入了可接受范围 mg/kg浓度范围。本文的目的是提供一些补充数据,以在分析实验室中实施NF EN 16274标准,并强调与扩展数据处理相关的固有困难,以及在各种现成注射样品中回收低浓度分析物和潜在共溶物的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Flavour and Fragrance Journal
Flavour and Fragrance Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
40
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Flavour and Fragrance Journal publishes original research articles, reviews and special reports on all aspects of flavour and fragrance. Its high scientific standards and international character is ensured by a strict refereeing system and an editorial team representing the multidisciplinary expertise of our field of research. Because analysis is the matter of many submissions and supports the data used in many other domains, a special attention is placed on the quality of analytical techniques. All natural or synthetic products eliciting or influencing a sensory stimulus related to gustation or olfaction are eligible for publication in the Journal. Eligible as well are the techniques related to their preparation, characterization and safety. This notably involves analytical and sensory analysis, physical chemistry, modeling, microbiology – antimicrobial properties, biology, chemosensory perception and legislation. The overall aim is to produce a journal of the highest quality which provides a scientific forum for academia as well as for industry on all aspects of flavors, fragrances and related materials, and which is valued by readers and contributors alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信