{"title":"Characteristics, Machinability Modeling, and Machining Performance Improvement of Graphene Reinforced Al-MMC Using CRSM and Utility Method","authors":"Manojit Das, Soumya R. Parimanik, Trupti Ranjan Mahapatra, Debadutta Mishra, Dilip Kumar Sahu","doi":"10.3103/S1063457623040020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><h3>A</h3><p><b>bstract</b>—The present experimental research examines the machinability of graphene-based aluminium metal matrix composite (AMMC) using a polycrystalline diamond (PCD) carbide-insert tool under a dry environment and compared it with that of pure aluminium. The AMMCs are synthesized by reinforcing 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 wt % of graphene particles via the stir casting process and are characterized for their density, tensile, compression, micro-hardness, and morphological properties. Response optimization is performed to minimize the two surface roughness factors (<i>R</i><sub><i>a</i></sub> and <i>R</i><sub><i>z</i></sub>), power consumption and vibration (average acceleration). The central composite design-based response surface methodology (CRSM) is implemented for planification of the experimentation and subsequent higher-order regression response modelling of the actual process outputs is obtained. The characterization and machinability of AMMCs incorporating higher (1, 2, and 3 wt %) of graphene is first time investigated alongside multi-performance (<i>R</i><sub><i>a</i></sub>, <i>R</i><sub><i>z</i></sub>, power consumption, and vibration) optimization. The optimal combination of the process parameters resulting in simultaneous minimization of all the responses is also acquired using the Utility concept, compared to those obtained using the desirability approach in RSM and validated by conducting the confirmatory test. Improvement in surface roughness values (7.85 and 36.26% for <i>R</i><sub><i>a</i></sub> and <i>R</i><sub><i>z</i></sub>, respectively) and average acceleration (18.09%) are observed via the Utility method in comparison to the CRSM. Enhanced output results in comparison to pure aluminium are also observed.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Superhard Materials","volume":"45 4","pages":"266 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Superhard Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S1063457623040020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A
bstract—The present experimental research examines the machinability of graphene-based aluminium metal matrix composite (AMMC) using a polycrystalline diamond (PCD) carbide-insert tool under a dry environment and compared it with that of pure aluminium. The AMMCs are synthesized by reinforcing 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 wt % of graphene particles via the stir casting process and are characterized for their density, tensile, compression, micro-hardness, and morphological properties. Response optimization is performed to minimize the two surface roughness factors (Ra and Rz), power consumption and vibration (average acceleration). The central composite design-based response surface methodology (CRSM) is implemented for planification of the experimentation and subsequent higher-order regression response modelling of the actual process outputs is obtained. The characterization and machinability of AMMCs incorporating higher (1, 2, and 3 wt %) of graphene is first time investigated alongside multi-performance (Ra, Rz, power consumption, and vibration) optimization. The optimal combination of the process parameters resulting in simultaneous minimization of all the responses is also acquired using the Utility concept, compared to those obtained using the desirability approach in RSM and validated by conducting the confirmatory test. Improvement in surface roughness values (7.85 and 36.26% for Ra and Rz, respectively) and average acceleration (18.09%) are observed via the Utility method in comparison to the CRSM. Enhanced output results in comparison to pure aluminium are also observed.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Superhard Materials presents up-to-date results of basic and applied research on production, properties, and applications of superhard materials and related tools. It publishes the results of fundamental research on physicochemical processes of forming and growth of single-crystal, polycrystalline, and dispersed materials, diamond and diamond-like films; developments of methods for spontaneous and controlled synthesis of superhard materials and methods for static, explosive and epitaxial synthesis. The focus of the journal is large single crystals of synthetic diamonds; elite grinding powders and micron powders of synthetic diamonds and cubic boron nitride; polycrystalline and composite superhard materials based on diamond and cubic boron nitride; diamond and carbide tools for highly efficient metal-working, boring, stone-working, coal mining and geological exploration; articles of ceramic; polishing pastes for high-precision optics; precision lathes for diamond turning; technologies of precise machining of metals, glass, and ceramics. The journal covers all fundamental and technological aspects of synthesis, characterization, properties, devices and applications of these materials. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English language.