Dependence of neovascularization mechanisms on the molecular microenvironment.

Eliane R Popa, Barry W A van der Strate, Linda A Brouwer, Henko Tadema, Martin Schipper, Brian Fernandes, Marc Hendriks, Marja J A van Luyn, Martin C Harmsen
{"title":"Dependence of neovascularization mechanisms on the molecular microenvironment.","authors":"Eliane R Popa,&nbsp;Barry W A van der Strate,&nbsp;Linda A Brouwer,&nbsp;Henko Tadema,&nbsp;Martin Schipper,&nbsp;Brian Fernandes,&nbsp;Marc Hendriks,&nbsp;Marja J A van Luyn,&nbsp;Martin C Harmsen","doi":"10.1089/ten.2007.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo vascularization of implanted (bio)artificial constructs is essential for their proper function. Vascularization may rely on sprouting angiogenesis, vascular incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial cells (BMDECs), or both. Here we investigated the relative contribution of these 2 mechanisms to neovascularization in a mouse model of a foreign body reaction (FBR) to subcutaneously implanted Dacron and in hind limb ischemia (HLI) in relation to the molecular microenvironment at these neovascularization sites. Neovascularization was studied in C57Bl/6 mice reconstituted with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) transgenic bone marrow. Sprouting angiogenesis, detected using nuclear incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine in endothelial cells was present in both models, whereas vascular incorporation of EGFP(+) BMDECs was restricted to HLI. In HLI, the presence of a pro-angiogenic molecular microenvironment comprising vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor 2, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor corroborated the importance of these factors for vascular BMDEC incorporation, whereas this microenvironment was absent in FBR. Enhanced mobilization of BMDECs by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration or by combining HLI and FBR with Dacron did not induce incorporation of BMDECs in FBR neovessels. We conclude that the efficacy of BMDEC-based therapy is not generally warranted, but it depends on the molecular microenvironment in the targeted tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":23102,"journal":{"name":"Tissue engineering","volume":" ","pages":"2913-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/ten.2007.0031","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2007.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In vivo vascularization of implanted (bio)artificial constructs is essential for their proper function. Vascularization may rely on sprouting angiogenesis, vascular incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial cells (BMDECs), or both. Here we investigated the relative contribution of these 2 mechanisms to neovascularization in a mouse model of a foreign body reaction (FBR) to subcutaneously implanted Dacron and in hind limb ischemia (HLI) in relation to the molecular microenvironment at these neovascularization sites. Neovascularization was studied in C57Bl/6 mice reconstituted with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) transgenic bone marrow. Sprouting angiogenesis, detected using nuclear incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine in endothelial cells was present in both models, whereas vascular incorporation of EGFP(+) BMDECs was restricted to HLI. In HLI, the presence of a pro-angiogenic molecular microenvironment comprising vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor 2, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor corroborated the importance of these factors for vascular BMDEC incorporation, whereas this microenvironment was absent in FBR. Enhanced mobilization of BMDECs by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration or by combining HLI and FBR with Dacron did not induce incorporation of BMDECs in FBR neovessels. We conclude that the efficacy of BMDEC-based therapy is not generally warranted, but it depends on the molecular microenvironment in the targeted tissue.

新生血管形成机制对分子微环境的依赖性。
植入式(生物)人工结构体的体内血管化对其正常功能至关重要。血管形成可能依赖于新生血管生成,骨髓内皮细胞(BMDECs)的血管结合,或两者兼而有之。在此,我们研究了这两种机制对皮下植入涤纶的异物反应(FBR)小鼠模型和后肢缺血(HLI)小鼠模型中新生血管形成的相对贡献,以及这些新生血管形成部位的分子微环境的关系。用增强绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)转基因骨髓重组C57Bl/6小鼠,研究其新生血管的形成。在内皮细胞中,通过溴脱氧尿苷的核掺入检测到血管新生,而EGFP(+) BMDECs的血管掺入仅限于HLI。在HLI中,存在促血管生成分子微环境,包括血管内皮生长因子、成纤维细胞生长因子2和粒细胞集落刺激因子,证实了这些因子对血管BMDEC整合的重要性,而在FBR中则不存在这种微环境。粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子管理或HLI、FBR与达龙联合使用增强BMDECs的动员,并没有诱导BMDECs在FBR新生血管中的结合。我们的结论是,以bmdec为基础的治疗效果并不普遍,但它取决于目标组织中的分子微环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue engineering
Tissue engineering CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信