Chiropractic and osteopathic education at Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. A student perspective.

S D French, S J Marshall, M Webb, C Tucker
{"title":"Chiropractic and osteopathic education at Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. A student perspective.","authors":"S D French,&nbsp;S J Marshall,&nbsp;M Webb,&nbsp;C Tucker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the attitudes of undergraduate chiropractic and osteopathic students at Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) in 1992 on the education they are receiving and on the effectiveness of chiropractic and osteopathic care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional descriptive survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Undergraduate chiropractic and osteopathic students enrolled at RMIT School of Chiropractic and Osteopathy in 1992.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study surveyed 272 students, 196 who were chiropractic students and 76 who were osteopathic students from RMIT School of Chiropractic and Osteopathy in Melbourne, Australia. The students that responded represented 73.4% of chiropractic students and 85.4% of osteopathic students currently enrolled in their respective courses. Chiropractic and osteopathic students entered their respective courses from non-chiropractic/non-osteopathic families. More chiropractic students than osteopathic students (1.3:1.0) had their respective course as their first choice when applying for tertiary education. A majority (95.8 chiropractic students and 94.8% osteopathic students) of both groups surveyed were pleased with their choice of course. Students from both disciplines held considerable respect for each other in the care of certain conditions, but did not see the other profession's care as effective as their own. A greater percentage of osteopathic students believed there was sufficient difference between chiropractic and osteopathy to justify two separate professions (57.6% compared to 97.2%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>High quality education is a major aim in our schools and colleges. For this standard to be maintained it requires continual re-evaluation and assessment. Surveys such as this should be performed regularly as a method of evaluating student attitude and how these attitudes change during the course. This would also allow administrators to determine whether they are achieving their academic intentions. An immediate follow up survey asking the same questions is suggested to ascertain whether the same attitudes exist today.</p>","PeriodicalId":93829,"journal":{"name":"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia","volume":"8 1","pages":"10-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the attitudes of undergraduate chiropractic and osteopathic students at Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) in 1992 on the education they are receiving and on the effectiveness of chiropractic and osteopathic care.

Design: Cross-sectional descriptive survey.

Participants: Undergraduate chiropractic and osteopathic students enrolled at RMIT School of Chiropractic and Osteopathy in 1992.

Results: This study surveyed 272 students, 196 who were chiropractic students and 76 who were osteopathic students from RMIT School of Chiropractic and Osteopathy in Melbourne, Australia. The students that responded represented 73.4% of chiropractic students and 85.4% of osteopathic students currently enrolled in their respective courses. Chiropractic and osteopathic students entered their respective courses from non-chiropractic/non-osteopathic families. More chiropractic students than osteopathic students (1.3:1.0) had their respective course as their first choice when applying for tertiary education. A majority (95.8 chiropractic students and 94.8% osteopathic students) of both groups surveyed were pleased with their choice of course. Students from both disciplines held considerable respect for each other in the care of certain conditions, but did not see the other profession's care as effective as their own. A greater percentage of osteopathic students believed there was sufficient difference between chiropractic and osteopathy to justify two separate professions (57.6% compared to 97.2%).

Discussion: High quality education is a major aim in our schools and colleges. For this standard to be maintained it requires continual re-evaluation and assessment. Surveys such as this should be performed regularly as a method of evaluating student attitude and how these attitudes change during the course. This would also allow administrators to determine whether they are achieving their academic intentions. An immediate follow up survey asking the same questions is suggested to ascertain whether the same attitudes exist today.

皇家墨尔本理工学院的脊椎按摩和整骨疗法教育。一个学生的视角。
目的:评估1992年皇家墨尔本理工学院(RMIT)本科生捏脊和整骨疗法学生对他们所接受的教育以及捏脊和整骨疗法治疗效果的态度。设计:横断面描述性调查。参与者:1992年在RMIT脊椎和整骨疗法学院注册的脊椎和整骨疗法本科生。结果:本研究调查了来自澳大利亚墨尔本RMIT脊椎和整骨医学院的272名学生,其中196名是脊椎治疗专业的学生,76名是整骨治疗专业的学生。作出回应的学生分别占现时修读有关课程的脊医学生的73.4%及整骨疗法学生的85.4%。脊椎疗法和整骨疗法的学生来自非脊椎疗法/非整骨疗法的家庭。脊医学生在申请高等教育时,以所属专业作为第一选择的人数多于整骨医学生(1.3∶1.0)。接受调查的两组学生中,大多数人(95.8指压疗法学生和94.8%整骨疗法学生)对他们选择的课程感到满意。来自两个学科的学生在特定条件下的护理方面都相当尊重对方,但没有看到其他专业的护理像他们自己的那样有效。更大比例的整骨疗法学生认为整脊疗法和整骨疗法之间有足够的差异,可以区分为两种专业(57.6%比97.2%)。讨论:高质量的教育是我们学校和大学的主要目标。为了维持这一标准,需要不断地重新评价和评估。像这样的调查应该定期进行,作为评估学生态度以及这些态度在课程中如何变化的一种方法。这也将使管理人员能够确定他们是否实现了他们的学术意图。建议立即进行一项跟进调查,询问同样的问题,以确定今天是否存在同样的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信