Enantiorecognition of triiodothyronine and thyroxine enantiomers using different chiral selectors by HPLC and micro-HPLC

Julia Koidl, Heike Hödl, Martin G. Schmid, Bianca Neubauer, Marlene Konrad, Sabine Petschauer, Gerald Gübitz
{"title":"Enantiorecognition of triiodothyronine and thyroxine enantiomers using different chiral selectors by HPLC and micro-HPLC","authors":"Julia Koidl,&nbsp;Heike Hödl,&nbsp;Martin G. Schmid,&nbsp;Bianca Neubauer,&nbsp;Marlene Konrad,&nbsp;Sabine Petschauer,&nbsp;Gerald Gübitz","doi":"10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper deals with the chiral separation of triiodothyronine (T<sub>3</sub>) and thyroxine (T<sub>4</sub>) by HPLC and micro-HPLC. The separation of T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub> is of great pharmaceutical and clinical interest, since the enantiomers exhibit different pharmacological activities. The HPLC measurements were performed on a chiral stationary ligand-exchange phase using <span>l</span>-4-hydroxyproline bonded via 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane to silica gel as a selector. Also a chiral teicoplanin (Chirobiotic ™®) phase was used.</p><p>In micro-HPLC the chiral separation behaviour of <span>l</span>-4-hydroxyproline, and of the macrocyclic antibiotics teicoplanin and teicoplanin aglycone was investigated for the enantioseparation of T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub>. <span>l</span>-4-Hydroxyproline was bonded to 3 μm and the glycopeptide antibiotics were bonded to 3.5 μm silica gel and separations were accomplished by microbore HPLC columns (10 cm<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->1 mm I.D.). With both techniques and all chiral selectors investigated T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub> were baseline resolved. micro-HPLC was found to be superior to analytical HPLC with respect to low consumption of packing material, mobile phase and analyte.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15257,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.09.007","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165022X07001637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This paper deals with the chiral separation of triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) by HPLC and micro-HPLC. The separation of T3 and T4 is of great pharmaceutical and clinical interest, since the enantiomers exhibit different pharmacological activities. The HPLC measurements were performed on a chiral stationary ligand-exchange phase using l-4-hydroxyproline bonded via 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane to silica gel as a selector. Also a chiral teicoplanin (Chirobiotic ™®) phase was used.

In micro-HPLC the chiral separation behaviour of l-4-hydroxyproline, and of the macrocyclic antibiotics teicoplanin and teicoplanin aglycone was investigated for the enantioseparation of T3 and T4. l-4-Hydroxyproline was bonded to 3 μm and the glycopeptide antibiotics were bonded to 3.5 μm silica gel and separations were accomplished by microbore HPLC columns (10 cm × 1 mm I.D.). With both techniques and all chiral selectors investigated T3 and T4 were baseline resolved. micro-HPLC was found to be superior to analytical HPLC with respect to low consumption of packing material, mobile phase and analyte.

不同手性选择剂对三碘甲状腺原氨酸和甲状腺素对映体的高效液相色谱和微高效液相色谱识别
采用高效液相色谱法和微高效液相色谱法对三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)和甲状腺素(T4)进行了手性分离。T3和T4的分离具有重要的药学和临床意义,因为它们的对映体具有不同的药理活性。采用l-4-羟基脯氨酸通过3-甘氧基丙基三甲氧基硅烷键合硅胶作为选择剂,进行了手性固定配体交换相的高效液相色谱测定。同时使用手性teicoplanin (chirobiotm®)相。采用微高效液相色谱法研究了l-4-羟基脯氨酸、大环抗生素替柯planin和替柯planin苷元的手性分离行为,用于对T3和T4的对映体分离。l-4-羟基脯氨酸与3 μm硅胶结合,糖肽类抗生素与3.5 μm硅胶结合,采用10 cm × 1 mm id的微孔高效液相色谱柱分离。通过这两种技术和所调查的所有手性选择器,T3和T4都得到了基线解决。微高效液相色谱法在包装材料、流动相和分析物的消耗方面优于分析型高效液相色谱法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信