Australian chiropractic sports medicine: half way there or living on a prayer?

Henry Pollard, Wayne Hoskins, Andrew McHardy, Rod Bonello, Peter Garbutt, Mike Swain, George Dragasevic, Mario Pribicevic, Andrew Vitiello
{"title":"Australian chiropractic sports medicine: half way there or living on a prayer?","authors":"Henry Pollard,&nbsp;Wayne Hoskins,&nbsp;Andrew McHardy,&nbsp;Rod Bonello,&nbsp;Peter Garbutt,&nbsp;Mike Swain,&nbsp;George Dragasevic,&nbsp;Mario Pribicevic,&nbsp;Andrew Vitiello","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-15-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sports chiropractic within Australia has a chequered historical background of unorthodox individualistic displays of egocentric treatment approaches that emphasise specific technique preference and individual prowess rather than standardised evidence based management. This situation has changed in recent years with the acceptance of many within sports chiropractic to operate under an evidence informed banner and to embrace a research culture. Despite recent developments within the sports chiropractic movement, the profession is still plagued by a minority of practitioners continuing to espouse certain marginal and outlandish technique systems that beleaguer the mainstream core of sports chiropractic as a cohesive and homogeneous group. Modern chiropractic management is frequently multimodal in nature and incorporates components of passive and active care. Such management typically incorporates spinal and peripheral manipulation, mobilisation, soft tissue techniques, rehabilitation and therapeutic exercises. Externally, sports chiropractic has faced hurdles too, with a lack of recognition and acceptance by organized and orthodox sports medical groups. Whilst some arguments against the inclusion of chiropractic may be legitimate due to its historical baggage, much of the argument appears to be anti-competitive, insecure and driven by a closed-shop mentality.sequently, chiropractic as a profession still remains a pariah to the organised sports medicine world. Add to this an uncertain continuing education system, a lack of protection for the title 'sports chiropractor', a lack of a recognized specialist status and a lack of support from traditional chiropractic, the challenges for the growth and acceptance of the sports chiropractor are considerable. This article outlines the historical and current challenges, both internal and external, faced by sports chiropractic within Australia and proposes positive changes that will assist in recognition and inclusion of sports chiropractic in both chiropractic and multi-disciplinary sports medicine alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":" ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-15-14","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sports chiropractic within Australia has a chequered historical background of unorthodox individualistic displays of egocentric treatment approaches that emphasise specific technique preference and individual prowess rather than standardised evidence based management. This situation has changed in recent years with the acceptance of many within sports chiropractic to operate under an evidence informed banner and to embrace a research culture. Despite recent developments within the sports chiropractic movement, the profession is still plagued by a minority of practitioners continuing to espouse certain marginal and outlandish technique systems that beleaguer the mainstream core of sports chiropractic as a cohesive and homogeneous group. Modern chiropractic management is frequently multimodal in nature and incorporates components of passive and active care. Such management typically incorporates spinal and peripheral manipulation, mobilisation, soft tissue techniques, rehabilitation and therapeutic exercises. Externally, sports chiropractic has faced hurdles too, with a lack of recognition and acceptance by organized and orthodox sports medical groups. Whilst some arguments against the inclusion of chiropractic may be legitimate due to its historical baggage, much of the argument appears to be anti-competitive, insecure and driven by a closed-shop mentality.sequently, chiropractic as a profession still remains a pariah to the organised sports medicine world. Add to this an uncertain continuing education system, a lack of protection for the title 'sports chiropractor', a lack of a recognized specialist status and a lack of support from traditional chiropractic, the challenges for the growth and acceptance of the sports chiropractor are considerable. This article outlines the historical and current challenges, both internal and external, faced by sports chiropractic within Australia and proposes positive changes that will assist in recognition and inclusion of sports chiropractic in both chiropractic and multi-disciplinary sports medicine alike.

澳大利亚脊椎指压运动医学:成功了一半还是靠祈祷过活?
澳大利亚的运动脊椎指压疗法有着曲折的历史背景,其非正统的个人主义表现为以自我为中心的治疗方法,强调特定的技术偏好和个人能力,而不是标准化的基于证据的管理。近年来,这种情况发生了变化,许多运动脊医接受在证据知情的旗帜下运作,并接受研究文化。尽管最近在运动脊医运动中有了发展,但这个行业仍然受到少数从业者继续拥护某些边缘和古怪的技术系统的困扰,这些技术系统围攻了运动脊医作为一个有凝聚力和同质群体的主流核心。现代脊椎指压治疗在本质上经常是多模式的,并结合被动和主动护理的组成部分。这种管理通常包括脊柱和外周操作、活动、软组织技术、康复和治疗练习。从外部来看,运动脊椎疗法也面临着障碍,缺乏有组织和正统的运动医疗团体的认可和接受。虽然一些反对将脊椎指压疗法纳入其中的论点可能是合理的,因为它的历史包袱,但大部分的论点似乎是反竞争的,不安全的,并且是由一种封闭的心态驱动的。因此,脊椎按摩作为一种职业仍然是有组织的运动医学世界的贱民。再加上不确定的继续教育体系,缺乏对“运动脊医”头衔的保护,缺乏公认的专家地位以及缺乏传统脊医的支持,运动脊医的成长和接受面临着相当大的挑战。本文概述了澳大利亚脊骨按摩疗法所面临的历史和当前的挑战,包括内部和外部的挑战,并提出了积极的变化,这将有助于在脊骨按摩疗法和多学科运动医学中对脊骨按摩疗法的认可和包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信