Challenges and innovations in enhancing adherence

Shannon L. Mihalko , Gretchen A. Brenes , Deborah F. Farmer , Jeffrey A. Katula , Rajesh Balkrishnan , Deborah J. Bowen
{"title":"Challenges and innovations in enhancing adherence","authors":"Shannon L. Mihalko ,&nbsp;Gretchen A. Brenes ,&nbsp;Deborah F. Farmer ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Katula ,&nbsp;Rajesh Balkrishnan ,&nbsp;Deborah J. Bowen","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2004.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adherence is a complex phenomenon involving interactions among the individual, the environment and the community. In an adherence workshop, a small group of investigators discussed their experiences with challenges and innovations regarding adherence gleaned from clinical research. This article summarizes the information and outcomes of that meeting. Guided by theoretical frameworks for understanding and promoting adherence, challenges in the areas of measurement, community-based research, and interventions were explored and innovations for meeting these challenges suggested. The article concludes with recommendations for enhancing the adherence agenda: (1) adherence research must have a well-defined conceptual and theoretical basis; (2) individual perceptions and social context of behavior must be incorporated; (3) research must be undertaken as a collaborative process involving participants and the community. Looking ahead, it is clear that if we hope to develop a new and integrated model of adherence, we must continue to advance theory through theory testing, with particular attention given to mediators and diverse samples. Moreover, an interdisciplinary agenda is necessary to set the stage for bringing together researchers from various disciplines and backgrounds with both participants and community representatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72706,"journal":{"name":"Controlled clinical trials","volume":"25 5","pages":"Pages 447-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cct.2004.07.003","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Controlled clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245604000534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Adherence is a complex phenomenon involving interactions among the individual, the environment and the community. In an adherence workshop, a small group of investigators discussed their experiences with challenges and innovations regarding adherence gleaned from clinical research. This article summarizes the information and outcomes of that meeting. Guided by theoretical frameworks for understanding and promoting adherence, challenges in the areas of measurement, community-based research, and interventions were explored and innovations for meeting these challenges suggested. The article concludes with recommendations for enhancing the adherence agenda: (1) adherence research must have a well-defined conceptual and theoretical basis; (2) individual perceptions and social context of behavior must be incorporated; (3) research must be undertaken as a collaborative process involving participants and the community. Looking ahead, it is clear that if we hope to develop a new and integrated model of adherence, we must continue to advance theory through theory testing, with particular attention given to mediators and diverse samples. Moreover, an interdisciplinary agenda is necessary to set the stage for bringing together researchers from various disciplines and backgrounds with both participants and community representatives.

加强依从性方面的挑战和创新
依从性是一个复杂的现象,涉及个人、环境和社区之间的相互作用。在一个依从性研讨会上,一小群研究人员讨论了他们从临床研究中收集到的关于依从性的挑战和创新的经验。本文总结了该会议的信息和成果。在理解和促进依从性的理论框架的指导下,探讨了测量、社区研究和干预措施领域的挑战,并提出了应对这些挑战的创新方法。本文最后提出了加强遵医议程的建议:(1)遵医研究必须有明确的概念和理论基础;(2)个体认知和行为的社会背景必须结合起来;(3)研究必须作为一个涉及参与者和社区的合作过程进行。展望未来,很明显,如果我们希望开发一种新的、综合的依从性模型,我们必须继续通过理论检验来推进理论,特别注意中介和不同的样本。此外,一个跨学科的议程是必要的,以便为来自不同学科和背景的研究人员与参与者和社区代表聚集在一起创造条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信