The management of compound leg injuries in the West Midlands (UK): Are we meeting current guidelines?

K. Allison, M. Wong, B. Bolland, F. Peart, K. Porter
{"title":"The management of compound leg injuries in the West Midlands (UK): Are we meeting current guidelines?","authors":"K. Allison,&nbsp;M. Wong,&nbsp;B. Bolland,&nbsp;F. Peart,&nbsp;K. Porter","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2005.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The joint British Association of Plastic Surgeons and British Orthopaedic Association (BAPS/BOA) guidelines for the management of patients with open tibia fractures were published in 1991 and 1997 and provided a synopsis of injury epidemiology and best care. We present a retrospective review of 66 patients treated over a 2-year period (January 2001–February 2003) at a regional plastic surgery unit.</p><p>There were 33 direct admissions and 33 transfers from other hospitals in which the average delay in transfer was 7.8 days (1–28) and in whom 26 (79%) patients had already undergone surgery. Plastic surgeons were involved in 46 (62%) of the 66 patient cohort and 27 (82%) transferred patients. The delay after admission until soft tissue cover was 3.8 days (0–15). Twenty-nine (44%) complications were recorded, 20 (69%) of these were in the transferred group and additional orthopaedic intervention was needed in 11 (42%) of patients who had been operated on in other hospitals.</p><p>Despite widespread dissemination and teaching of the BAPS/BOA guidelines, complex extremity trauma is often not managed well in our region. There are unacceptable delays in admission, late communication, poor note keeping and follow up. The initial surgery/fixation is often sub-optimal and soft tissue reconstruction has to be considered at the least advantageous time period for the patient, leading to an increased hospital stay and complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9252,"journal":{"name":"British journal of plastic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.02.006","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007122605000330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

The joint British Association of Plastic Surgeons and British Orthopaedic Association (BAPS/BOA) guidelines for the management of patients with open tibia fractures were published in 1991 and 1997 and provided a synopsis of injury epidemiology and best care. We present a retrospective review of 66 patients treated over a 2-year period (January 2001–February 2003) at a regional plastic surgery unit.

There were 33 direct admissions and 33 transfers from other hospitals in which the average delay in transfer was 7.8 days (1–28) and in whom 26 (79%) patients had already undergone surgery. Plastic surgeons were involved in 46 (62%) of the 66 patient cohort and 27 (82%) transferred patients. The delay after admission until soft tissue cover was 3.8 days (0–15). Twenty-nine (44%) complications were recorded, 20 (69%) of these were in the transferred group and additional orthopaedic intervention was needed in 11 (42%) of patients who had been operated on in other hospitals.

Despite widespread dissemination and teaching of the BAPS/BOA guidelines, complex extremity trauma is often not managed well in our region. There are unacceptable delays in admission, late communication, poor note keeping and follow up. The initial surgery/fixation is often sub-optimal and soft tissue reconstruction has to be considered at the least advantageous time period for the patient, leading to an increased hospital stay and complications.

西米德兰兹郡(英国)复合腿部损伤的管理:我们是否符合当前的指导方针?
1991年和1997年,英国整形外科协会和英国骨科协会(BAPS/BOA)联合发布了开放性胫骨骨折患者的治疗指南,提供了损伤流行病学和最佳护理的概要。我们提出了一个回顾性分析66例患者治疗2年期间(2001年1月至2003年2月)在一个地区整形外科单位。直接入院33例,从其他医院转院33例,平均转院延误7.8天(1-28天),其中26例(79%)患者已接受手术。66例患者队列中的46例(62%)和27例(82%)转诊患者接受了整形外科医生的治疗。入院后至软组织覆盖延迟3.8天(0-15天)。记录了29例(44%)并发症,其中20例(69%)发生在转院组,11例(42%)在其他医院手术的患者需要额外的骨科干预。尽管BAPS/BOA指南广泛传播和教学,但在我们地区,复杂的肢体创伤往往得不到很好的处理。有不可接受的入学延误,沟通迟缓,笔记保存和跟进不良。最初的手术/固定通常是次优的,软组织重建必须考虑在对患者最不利的时间段,导致住院时间和并发症的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信