Self-reported awareness of performance in dementia

David P. Graham , Mark E. Kunik , Rachelle Doody , A. Lynn Snow
{"title":"Self-reported awareness of performance in dementia","authors":"David P. Graham ,&nbsp;Mark E. Kunik ,&nbsp;Rachelle Doody ,&nbsp;A. Lynn Snow","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to test the theory that patients with dementia<span> do not update their self-perceptions based on actual performance. This experiment compared differences between post-task perceptions of performance and actual performance in persons with dementia and normal controls on seven cognitive tasks. Participants included 35 volunteers (12 with dementia and 23 without) from the Houston Veterans Affairs nursing home and geropsychiatric inpatient unit and outpatient clinics and from the Baylor College of Medicine's Alzheimer's Disease Center. Measurements included 7 subtests of the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and standardized interview questions assessing perceived performance on each of these subtests. Participants with dementia had similar perceptions of performance to normal controls yet evidenced much worse performance on all seven cognitive screening tasks. Thirty-one percent of normal controls over-estimated their performance, compared to 64% of those with mild–moderate dementia and 93% with moderate–severe dementia. Our study supports the theory that demented individuals do not update their self-perceptions of performance. However, a large portion of normal controls was also inaccurate evaluating their own performances. Thus, post-diction measures provide useful insight into the mechanisms of self-awareness but may not be appropriate assessment tools to identify clinically significant impaired self-awareness.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.001","citationCount":"87","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005001217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the theory that patients with dementia do not update their self-perceptions based on actual performance. This experiment compared differences between post-task perceptions of performance and actual performance in persons with dementia and normal controls on seven cognitive tasks. Participants included 35 volunteers (12 with dementia and 23 without) from the Houston Veterans Affairs nursing home and geropsychiatric inpatient unit and outpatient clinics and from the Baylor College of Medicine's Alzheimer's Disease Center. Measurements included 7 subtests of the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and standardized interview questions assessing perceived performance on each of these subtests. Participants with dementia had similar perceptions of performance to normal controls yet evidenced much worse performance on all seven cognitive screening tasks. Thirty-one percent of normal controls over-estimated their performance, compared to 64% of those with mild–moderate dementia and 93% with moderate–severe dementia. Our study supports the theory that demented individuals do not update their self-perceptions of performance. However, a large portion of normal controls was also inaccurate evaluating their own performances. Thus, post-diction measures provide useful insight into the mechanisms of self-awareness but may not be appropriate assessment tools to identify clinically significant impaired self-awareness.

痴呆症患者自我报告的表现意识
这项研究的目的是测试痴呆症患者不会根据实际表现更新自我认知的理论。这项实验比较了痴呆症患者和正常人在完成七项认知任务后对表现的感知和实际表现的差异。参与者包括35名志愿者(12名患有痴呆症,23名没有痴呆症),他们来自休斯顿退伍军人事务养老院、老年精神病学住院病房和门诊诊所,以及贝勒医学院阿尔茨海默病中心。测量包括阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知量表的7个子测试和评估每个子测试的感知表现的标准化访谈问题。痴呆症患者的表现与正常对照组相似,但在所有七项认知筛查任务中的表现都要差得多。31%的正常对照组高估了自己的表现,而轻度至中度痴呆患者和中度至重度痴呆患者的这一比例分别为64%和93%。我们的研究支持这样一种理论,即精神错乱的人不会更新他们对表现的自我认知。然而,很大一部分正常对照组对自身表现的评价也不准确。因此,言语后测量提供了有用的洞察自我意识的机制,但可能不是适当的评估工具,以确定临床显著受损的自我意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信