An approach to understanding the transmission of Mycobacterium leprae using molecular and immunological methods: results from the MILEP2 study.

W Cairns S Smith, Christine M Smith, Ian A Cree, Ruprendra S Jadhav, Murdo Macdonald, Vijay K Edward, Linda Oskam, Stella van Beers, Paul Klatser
{"title":"An approach to understanding the transmission of Mycobacterium leprae using molecular and immunological methods: results from the MILEP2 study.","authors":"W Cairns S Smith,&nbsp;Christine M Smith,&nbsp;Ian A Cree,&nbsp;Ruprendra S Jadhav,&nbsp;Murdo Macdonald,&nbsp;Vijay K Edward,&nbsp;Linda Oskam,&nbsp;Stella van Beers,&nbsp;Paul Klatser","doi":"10.1489/0020-7349(2004)72<269:AATUTT>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current strategy for leprosy control using case detection and treatment has greatly reduced the prevalence of leprosy, but has had no demonstrable effect on interrupting transmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three leprosy endemic communities in India were recruited, examined, and followed up sequentially over 2 yrs using nasal swabs and saliva collections. The nasal swabs were tested by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of M. leprae and the saliva was assayed for anti-M. leprae IgA.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Only 1.6% of 2552 nasal swabs were PCR positive, and 68% of saliva samples were positive for ML-IgA. BCG and household contact status was associated with the mucosal immune response, but not with PCR positivity. PCR positivity did not persist and most PCR positive results were in the wet season.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The findings contribute to our understanding of the epidemiology of M. leprae and the possible periods of greatest likelihood of exposure and transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":14078,"journal":{"name":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","volume":" ","pages":"269-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1489/0020-7349(2004)72<269:AATUTT>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Background: The current strategy for leprosy control using case detection and treatment has greatly reduced the prevalence of leprosy, but has had no demonstrable effect on interrupting transmission.

Methods: Three leprosy endemic communities in India were recruited, examined, and followed up sequentially over 2 yrs using nasal swabs and saliva collections. The nasal swabs were tested by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of M. leprae and the saliva was assayed for anti-M. leprae IgA.

Findings: Only 1.6% of 2552 nasal swabs were PCR positive, and 68% of saliva samples were positive for ML-IgA. BCG and household contact status was associated with the mucosal immune response, but not with PCR positivity. PCR positivity did not persist and most PCR positive results were in the wet season.

Interpretation: The findings contribute to our understanding of the epidemiology of M. leprae and the possible periods of greatest likelihood of exposure and transmission.

利用分子和免疫学方法了解麻风分枝杆菌传播的方法:来自MILEP2研究的结果。
背景:目前采用病例发现和治疗的麻风控制策略大大降低了麻风的患病率,但在阻断传播方面没有明显的效果。方法:在印度3个麻风病流行社区进行招募、检查,并使用鼻拭子和唾液收集进行连续2年的随访。采用聚合酶链反应法检测鼻拭子中麻风分枝杆菌的存在,测定唾液中抗麻风分枝杆菌的含量。即麻风IgA。结果:2552份鼻拭子中仅有1.6%的PCR阳性,68%的唾液样本ML-IgA阳性。卡介苗和家庭接触状况与黏膜免疫反应相关,但与PCR阳性无关。PCR阳性不持久,多数PCR阳性结果出现在雨季。解释:这些发现有助于我们了解麻风分枝杆菌的流行病学以及最有可能接触和传播的可能时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信