Improving asthma symptom control in rural communities: the design of the Better Respiratory Education and Asthma Treatment in Hinton and Edson study

Theresa Charrois , Stephen Newman , Don Sin , Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan , Ross T. Tsuyuki
{"title":"Improving asthma symptom control in rural communities: the design of the Better Respiratory Education and Asthma Treatment in Hinton and Edson study","authors":"Theresa Charrois ,&nbsp;Stephen Newman ,&nbsp;Don Sin ,&nbsp;Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan ,&nbsp;Ross T. Tsuyuki","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2004.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The prevalence of asthma in adults in the United States is approximately 7%, and 9% of asthma patients will require hospitalization each year. Many patients do not seek care, as they do not recognize overuse of beta-agonists as a risk factor for poorly controlled asthma. However, pharmacists are able to identify these patients through refill information on reliever medication prescriptions and potentially initiate community-management opportunities for these patients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The study is a randomized, controlled trial. Patients are randomized to intervention or usual care.</p></div><div><h3>Study population</h3><p>Patients are high-risk asthma patients (defined as having an ER visit or hospitalization in the previous year, or using &gt;2 canisters of short-acting beta-agonist in the previous 6 months). They are identified through community pharmacies.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The primary objective is to determine the effect of an education and referral intervention program initiated by community pharmacists, working with high-risk asthma patients, family physicians and respiratory therapists, on asthma control, as measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). Secondary objectives include determining the effect of this program on ER visits/hospitalizations, inhaled corticosteroid use, courses of oral steroids and FEV<sub>1</sub>.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The intervention includes patient education, assessment and optimization of drug therapy, and physician referral as needed. Patients are referred to a respiratory therapist within 1 week of randomization for measurement of FEV<sub>1</sub> and reinforcement of education. Patients assigned to usual care receive written asthma information, referral to a respiratory therapist and usual pharmacy and physician care.</p></div><div><h3>Unique aspects</h3><p>The design of the Better Respiratory Education and Asthma Treatment in Hinton and Edson (BREATHE) study is unique, given the multidisciplinary involvement, rural and community based, pharmacist initiated and targets specifically high risk patients. We believe that this study will show that management of asthma patients, involving the major role-players in their asthma care, will improve their asthma control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72706,"journal":{"name":"Controlled clinical trials","volume":"25 5","pages":"Pages 502-514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cct.2004.07.004","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Controlled clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245604000674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Methods

The prevalence of asthma in adults in the United States is approximately 7%, and 9% of asthma patients will require hospitalization each year. Many patients do not seek care, as they do not recognize overuse of beta-agonists as a risk factor for poorly controlled asthma. However, pharmacists are able to identify these patients through refill information on reliever medication prescriptions and potentially initiate community-management opportunities for these patients.

Design

The study is a randomized, controlled trial. Patients are randomized to intervention or usual care.

Study population

Patients are high-risk asthma patients (defined as having an ER visit or hospitalization in the previous year, or using >2 canisters of short-acting beta-agonist in the previous 6 months). They are identified through community pharmacies.

Objectives

The primary objective is to determine the effect of an education and referral intervention program initiated by community pharmacists, working with high-risk asthma patients, family physicians and respiratory therapists, on asthma control, as measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). Secondary objectives include determining the effect of this program on ER visits/hospitalizations, inhaled corticosteroid use, courses of oral steroids and FEV1.

Intervention

The intervention includes patient education, assessment and optimization of drug therapy, and physician referral as needed. Patients are referred to a respiratory therapist within 1 week of randomization for measurement of FEV1 and reinforcement of education. Patients assigned to usual care receive written asthma information, referral to a respiratory therapist and usual pharmacy and physician care.

Unique aspects

The design of the Better Respiratory Education and Asthma Treatment in Hinton and Edson (BREATHE) study is unique, given the multidisciplinary involvement, rural and community based, pharmacist initiated and targets specifically high risk patients. We believe that this study will show that management of asthma patients, involving the major role-players in their asthma care, will improve their asthma control.

改善农村社区哮喘症状控制:Hinton和Edson研究中更好的呼吸教育和哮喘治疗的设计
方法美国成人哮喘患病率约为7%,每年有9%的哮喘患者需要住院治疗。许多患者不寻求治疗,因为他们不认识到过度使用-受体激动剂是控制不良哮喘的一个危险因素。然而,药剂师能够通过补充缓解药物处方的信息来识别这些患者,并可能为这些患者提供社区管理机会。本研究为随机对照试验。患者随机分为干预组和常规组。研究人群:患者为高危哮喘患者(定义为前一年就诊或住院,或在过去6个月内使用2罐短效β受体激动剂)。通过社区药房进行鉴定。主要目的是通过哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)来确定由社区药剂师(与高危哮喘患者、家庭医生和呼吸治疗师一起工作)发起的教育和转诊干预计划对哮喘控制的影响。次要目标包括确定该计划对急诊就诊/住院、吸入皮质类固醇使用、口服类固醇疗程和FEV1的影响。干预措施包括患者教育,药物治疗的评估和优化,以及必要时的医生转诊。患者在随机分组后的1周内转介给呼吸治疗师,以测量FEV1并加强教育。被分配到常规护理的患者会收到书面的哮喘信息,转介给呼吸治疗师以及常规的药房和医生护理。独特的方面更好的呼吸教育和哮喘治疗在Hinton和Edson(呼吸)研究的设计是独特的,考虑到多学科的参与,农村和社区为基础,药剂师发起,并专门针对高风险患者。我们相信这项研究将表明哮喘患者的管理,包括哮喘护理的主要角色参与者,将改善他们的哮喘控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信