Soegianto Ali, Jos F van Pelt, Chris Verslype, Frederik Nevens, Johan Fevery, Sing H Yap
{"title":"TT virus infection in acute and chronic liver diseases and in patients regularly receiving blood products in Belgium.","authors":"Soegianto Ali, Jos F van Pelt, Chris Verslype, Frederik Nevens, Johan Fevery, Sing H Yap","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>TT viruses are single-stranded DNA viruses, suggested to be involved in non A-E hepatitis. We studied the prevalence of TTV infection in acute or chronic hepatitis in Belgium in comparison with that in blood donors and in patients regularly receiving blood products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TTV-DNA was detected by PCR using the primer set of Takahashi et al (1998) or a nested-PCR specific for genotype-2, because it had been reported that this subtype might be more pathogenic (Tagger et al. 1999).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TTV-DNA was present in 49% of 128 patients with chronic hepatitis C, in 54% of 54 with chronic hepatitis B and in 54% of 24 with acute liver failure. This prevalence is similar to the 47% in 127 patients with clotting disorders, or the 64% in 103 undergoing chronic haemodialysis, but lower than the 29.7% found in 340 healthy blood donors. Significant differences in clinical or biochemical characteristics between TTV- positive or TTV-negative patients could not be substantiated. The genotype-2 subgroup comprised 3.9%, but they also did not differ from non genotype-2 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of TTV infection was higher in patients than in healthy blood donors. Its clinical significance remains questionable since clinical and biochemical characteristics were not different between TTV positive and TTV negative patients. The higher prevalence of TTV in patients might be related to parenteral transmission, but the relatively high prevalence in healthy blood donors points to an additional presumably faeco-oral infection. The presence of TTV in animals suggests that infection might also originate from food. Long term follow-up will have to define whether co-infection with TTV eventually alters the natural history of chronic hepatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50942,"journal":{"name":"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica","volume":"67 2","pages":"161-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: TT viruses are single-stranded DNA viruses, suggested to be involved in non A-E hepatitis. We studied the prevalence of TTV infection in acute or chronic hepatitis in Belgium in comparison with that in blood donors and in patients regularly receiving blood products.
Methods: TTV-DNA was detected by PCR using the primer set of Takahashi et al (1998) or a nested-PCR specific for genotype-2, because it had been reported that this subtype might be more pathogenic (Tagger et al. 1999).
Results: TTV-DNA was present in 49% of 128 patients with chronic hepatitis C, in 54% of 54 with chronic hepatitis B and in 54% of 24 with acute liver failure. This prevalence is similar to the 47% in 127 patients with clotting disorders, or the 64% in 103 undergoing chronic haemodialysis, but lower than the 29.7% found in 340 healthy blood donors. Significant differences in clinical or biochemical characteristics between TTV- positive or TTV-negative patients could not be substantiated. The genotype-2 subgroup comprised 3.9%, but they also did not differ from non genotype-2 patients.
Conclusions: The prevalence of TTV infection was higher in patients than in healthy blood donors. Its clinical significance remains questionable since clinical and biochemical characteristics were not different between TTV positive and TTV negative patients. The higher prevalence of TTV in patients might be related to parenteral transmission, but the relatively high prevalence in healthy blood donors points to an additional presumably faeco-oral infection. The presence of TTV in animals suggests that infection might also originate from food. Long term follow-up will have to define whether co-infection with TTV eventually alters the natural history of chronic hepatitis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.