The North Carolina Experience with the Diabetes Health Disparities Collaboratives

Anthea Wang M.D., M.P.H., Marti Wolf R.N., M.P.H., Randy Carlyle M.T., M.P.A. (Director of Patient Services), Janice Wilkerson R.N., C.P.H.Q., Deborah Porterfield M.D., M.P.H. (Consultant), Janet Reaves R.N., M.P.H. (Head)
{"title":"The North Carolina Experience with the Diabetes Health Disparities Collaboratives","authors":"Anthea Wang M.D., M.P.H.,&nbsp;Marti Wolf R.N., M.P.H.,&nbsp;Randy Carlyle M.T., M.P.A. (Director of Patient Services),&nbsp;Janice Wilkerson R.N., C.P.H.Q.,&nbsp;Deborah Porterfield M.D., M.P.H. (Consultant),&nbsp;Janet Reaves R.N., M.P.H. (Head)","doi":"10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30045-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) adopted a collaborative approach that used the Chronic Care Model and quality improvement methods. The North Carolina Diabetes Prevention and Control Branch has partnered with the 12 participating community health centers since early 2000.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Team leaders of the first four centers that participated in the collaboratives were interviewed. Information obtained included previous diabetes efforts, benefits of the collaborative, success factors, and barriers to sustainability.</p></div><div><h3>Case Study</h3><p>In one of two case studies, a nonprofit community health center made Chronic Care Model-based changes to the organization of health care, clinical information systems, and delivery system design.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Centers tracked used the electronic registry to establish a baseline, trend key process and outcome measures, and raise the standard of care. Success factors included senior leadership support, physician champions, multidisciplinary teams, and priority of collaborative activities. Barriers included staff turnover and low priority in strategic planning. Glycohemoglobin (A1C) values from aggregated reports demonstrated improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Useful strategies for future collaboratives may include providing provider-specific data, imparting vision to new team members, ensuring that leadership provides collaborative structure and resources, and pairing veteran and new participating sites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84970,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","volume":"30 7","pages":"Pages 396-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30045-6","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1549374104300456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Background

The Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) adopted a collaborative approach that used the Chronic Care Model and quality improvement methods. The North Carolina Diabetes Prevention and Control Branch has partnered with the 12 participating community health centers since early 2000.

Methods

Team leaders of the first four centers that participated in the collaboratives were interviewed. Information obtained included previous diabetes efforts, benefits of the collaborative, success factors, and barriers to sustainability.

Case Study

In one of two case studies, a nonprofit community health center made Chronic Care Model-based changes to the organization of health care, clinical information systems, and delivery system design.

Results

Centers tracked used the electronic registry to establish a baseline, trend key process and outcome measures, and raise the standard of care. Success factors included senior leadership support, physician champions, multidisciplinary teams, and priority of collaborative activities. Barriers included staff turnover and low priority in strategic planning. Glycohemoglobin (A1C) values from aggregated reports demonstrated improvement.

Discussion

Useful strategies for future collaboratives may include providing provider-specific data, imparting vision to new team members, ensuring that leadership provides collaborative structure and resources, and pairing veteran and new participating sites.

北卡罗莱纳与糖尿病健康差异合作的经验
初级卫生保健局(BPHC)采用了一种协作方式,使用了慢性护理模式和质量改进方法。自2000年初以来,北卡罗莱纳州糖尿病预防和控制处与12个参与的社区卫生中心建立了伙伴关系。方法对参与协作的前四个中心的steam负责人进行访谈。获得的信息包括以前的糖尿病努力、合作的好处、成功因素和可持续性的障碍。在两个案例研究中的一个案例中,一家非营利社区卫生中心对卫生保健组织、临床信息系统和交付系统设计进行了基于慢性护理模型的更改。结果跟踪的中心使用电子登记建立基线、趋势关键过程和结果测量,并提高护理标准。成功的因素包括高层领导的支持、医师冠军、多学科团队和协作活动的优先级。障碍包括工作人员更替和战略规划的低优先级。综合报告中的糖化血红蛋白(A1C)值显示改善。讨论未来合作的有用策略可能包括提供供应商特定的数据,向新的团队成员传授愿景,确保领导提供协作结构和资源,以及将经验丰富的和新的参与站点配对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书