Physician-Perceived Barriers to Adopting a Critical Pathway for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Sumit R. Majumdar M.D., M.P.H. (Assistant Professor), Scot H. Simpson Pharm.D., M.Sc. (Research Associate), Thomas J. Marrie M.D. (Professor and Chairman)
{"title":"Physician-Perceived Barriers to Adopting a Critical Pathway for Community-Acquired Pneumonia","authors":"Sumit R. Majumdar M.D., M.P.H. (Assistant Professor),&nbsp;Scot H. Simpson Pharm.D., M.Sc. (Research Associate),&nbsp;Thomas J. Marrie M.D. (Professor and Chairman)","doi":"10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30044-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A proven efficacious and evidence-based critical pathway for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) was implemented in six hospitals across a health service region (Edmonton, Canada). After one year (November 2000–November 2001), the pathway had reduced average length of stay by 1 day (from 10.8 to 9.8 days, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). However, great variation was observed in physician adherence to the pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Physician-perceived barriers to adoption of the CAP pathway were identified through in-depth interviews. Data saturation was reached after 10 physicians, representing a convenience sample of those willing to participate, were interviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Self-reported adherence to the CAP pathway was 75% (range 50%–100%). Qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that comments could be grouped into five themes: (1) limited applicability, (2) lack of flexibility to accommodate atypical clinical presentations, (3) perception of insufficient evidence to support recommendations, (4) local organizational barriers, and (5) need for local adaptation. For example, one physician remarked that his community hospital had insufficient staff to support collection of lab samples for all patients.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Interventions to increase pathway adoption and further improve quality of CAP care should address the identified barriers. For example, local audit and feedback of outcomes data to persuade physicians of the benefits of CAP pathways will need to be instituted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84970,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","volume":"30 7","pages":"Pages 387-395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30044-4","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1549374104300444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background

A proven efficacious and evidence-based critical pathway for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) was implemented in six hospitals across a health service region (Edmonton, Canada). After one year (November 2000–November 2001), the pathway had reduced average length of stay by 1 day (from 10.8 to 9.8 days, p < .001). However, great variation was observed in physician adherence to the pathway.

Methods

Physician-perceived barriers to adoption of the CAP pathway were identified through in-depth interviews. Data saturation was reached after 10 physicians, representing a convenience sample of those willing to participate, were interviewed.

Results

Self-reported adherence to the CAP pathway was 75% (range 50%–100%). Qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that comments could be grouped into five themes: (1) limited applicability, (2) lack of flexibility to accommodate atypical clinical presentations, (3) perception of insufficient evidence to support recommendations, (4) local organizational barriers, and (5) need for local adaptation. For example, one physician remarked that his community hospital had insufficient staff to support collection of lab samples for all patients.

Discussion

Interventions to increase pathway adoption and further improve quality of CAP care should address the identified barriers. For example, local audit and feedback of outcomes data to persuade physicians of the benefits of CAP pathways will need to be instituted.

医生认为采用社区获得性肺炎关键途径的障碍
背景:在加拿大埃德蒙顿一个卫生服务地区的六家医院实施了一项有效且基于证据的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)关键途径。一年后(2000年11月至2001年11月),该途径将平均停留时间缩短了1天(从10.8天减少到9.8天)。措施)。然而,观察到医生对该途径的依从性存在很大差异。方法通过深入访谈确定医生认为采用CAP途径的障碍。在十位医生(代表愿意参与的方便样本)接受采访后,数据达到饱和。结果自我报告的CAP途径依从性为75%(范围为50%-100%)。访谈数据的定性分析表明,意见可分为五个主题:(1)适用性有限,(2)缺乏适应非典型临床表现的灵活性,(3)认为支持建议的证据不足,(4)当地组织障碍,(5)需要当地适应。例如,一位医生说,他所在的社区医院没有足够的工作人员来支持为所有病人收集实验室样本。增加途径采用和进一步提高CAP护理质量的干预措施应解决已确定的障碍。例如,需要建立对结果数据的本地审计和反馈,以使医生相信CAP途径的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书