Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Rebound Interval in Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Hormonal Therapy and External-Beam Radiation Therapy

Ashesh B. Jani , Abbas Al-Qamari , Bipin Sapra , Lani Krauz , Azhar Awan , Masha Kocherginsky , Daniel Gillen
{"title":"Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Rebound Interval in Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Hormonal Therapy and External-Beam Radiation Therapy","authors":"Ashesh B. Jani ,&nbsp;Abbas Al-Qamari ,&nbsp;Bipin Sapra ,&nbsp;Lani Krauz ,&nbsp;Azhar Awan ,&nbsp;Masha Kocherginsky ,&nbsp;Daniel Gillen","doi":"10.3816/CGC.2004.n.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this investigation is to characterize the clinical significance of the rebound interval (RI) after neoadjuvant short-course hormonal therapy (HT) and external-beam radiation therapy (RT), during which the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) may rise because of hormone withdrawal prior to full RT efficacy. The charts of 257 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer who received short-course neoadjuvant HT and RT were reviewed. A piecewise-linear log PSA versus time curve was generated for each patient and averaged over the population to facilitate identification of the RI start and end dates. Existing definitions of biochemical failure. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), Vancouver and Houston were applied, as were these same definitions modified to exclude failures during the RI. Sensitivity and specificity were analyzed, using no evidence (by digital rectal examination or radiology) of disease failure as the gold standard. The 5-year biochemical survival with different failure definitions were ASTRO versus ASTRO-modified: 81.6% versus 86.7%; Houston versus Houston-modified: 71.4% versus 76.7%; and Vancouver versus Vancouver-modified: 83.5% versus 85.6%. The sensitivity and specificity comparisons were ASTRO versus ASTRO-modified 58.3% versus 33.3%; 91.4% versus 94.3%, Vancouver versus Vancouver-modified: 50% versus 50%; 92.7% versus 95.5%, Houston versus Houstonmodified: 100% versus 66.7%; 90.6% versus 92.2%. The RI after HT and RT is likely not merely an artifact of hormone withdrawal but is correlated with ultimate clinical outcome. Excluding RI failures can marginally improve specificity but may possibly have an unacceptable risk of lowering sensitivity. Further work is needed to design and validate definitions of failure, which account for the RI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87076,"journal":{"name":"Clinical prostate cancer","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 43-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CGC.2004.n.012","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical prostate cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540035211700609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The goal of this investigation is to characterize the clinical significance of the rebound interval (RI) after neoadjuvant short-course hormonal therapy (HT) and external-beam radiation therapy (RT), during which the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) may rise because of hormone withdrawal prior to full RT efficacy. The charts of 257 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer who received short-course neoadjuvant HT and RT were reviewed. A piecewise-linear log PSA versus time curve was generated for each patient and averaged over the population to facilitate identification of the RI start and end dates. Existing definitions of biochemical failure. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), Vancouver and Houston were applied, as were these same definitions modified to exclude failures during the RI. Sensitivity and specificity were analyzed, using no evidence (by digital rectal examination or radiology) of disease failure as the gold standard. The 5-year biochemical survival with different failure definitions were ASTRO versus ASTRO-modified: 81.6% versus 86.7%; Houston versus Houston-modified: 71.4% versus 76.7%; and Vancouver versus Vancouver-modified: 83.5% versus 85.6%. The sensitivity and specificity comparisons were ASTRO versus ASTRO-modified 58.3% versus 33.3%; 91.4% versus 94.3%, Vancouver versus Vancouver-modified: 50% versus 50%; 92.7% versus 95.5%, Houston versus Houstonmodified: 100% versus 66.7%; 90.6% versus 92.2%. The RI after HT and RT is likely not merely an artifact of hormone withdrawal but is correlated with ultimate clinical outcome. Excluding RI failures can marginally improve specificity but may possibly have an unacceptable risk of lowering sensitivity. Further work is needed to design and validate definitions of failure, which account for the RI.

前列腺癌患者接受激素治疗和外束放射治疗时前列腺特异性抗原反弹间隔的分析
本研究的目的是表征新辅助短期激素治疗(HT)和外束放射治疗(RT)后反弹间隔(RI)的临床意义,在此期间,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)可能因激素停药而升高。本文回顾了257例连续接受短期新辅助HT和RT治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者的病历。为每位患者生成分段线性对数PSA与时间曲线,并在人群中平均,以方便识别RI开始和结束日期。现有的生化失效定义。美国放射治疗学和肿瘤学学会(ASTRO),温哥华和休斯顿被应用,因为这些相同的定义被修改以排除RI期间的失败。敏感度和特异性分析,以无证据(直肠指检或放射学)疾病失败为金标准。不同失效定义的5年生化生存率为ASTRO vs ASTRO-modified: 81.6% vs 86.7%;休斯顿vs休斯顿改良版:71.4% vs 76.7%;温哥华vs温哥华改良版:83.5% vs 85.6%。ASTRO和ASTRO改良的敏感性和特异性比较分别为58.3%和33.3%;91.4% vs 94.3%,温哥华vs温哥华修正:50% vs 50%;92.7% vs 95.5%,休斯顿vs休斯敦修正版:100% vs 66.7%;90.6%对92.2%。HT和RT后的RI可能不仅仅是激素戒断的产物,而且与最终的临床结果相关。排除RI失败可以略微提高特异性,但可能有降低敏感性的不可接受的风险。需要进一步的工作来设计和验证失效的定义,这解释了RI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信