Immunological modulation by lidocaine-epinephrine and prilocaine-felypressin on the functions related to natural immunity in neutrophils and macrophages.

Yasutaka Azuma, Kiyoshi Ohura
{"title":"Immunological modulation by lidocaine-epinephrine and prilocaine-felypressin on the functions related to natural immunity in neutrophils and macrophages.","authors":"Yasutaka Azuma,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Ohura","doi":"10.2174/1568008043339974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is accumulating evidence that local anesthetics have immunological properties in addition to their direct anesthetic activity. Because local anesthetics are often used together with blood vessel contraction drugs, such as epinephrine and felypressin in the clinical setting, we have examined possible abilities of both local anesthetic alone including lidocaine, mepivacaine, procaine, prilocaine and tetracaine, and local anesthetics with blood vessel contraction drugs including lidocaine with epinephrine and prilocaine with felypressin on the functions related to natural immunity in neutrophils and macrophages. In contrast, lidocaine, mepivacaine, procaine, prilocaine and tetracaine all inhibited adhesion, chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the production of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide by neutrophils and macrophages. Lidocaine with epinephrine and prilocaine with felypressin were effective in significantly inhibiting adhesion, chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the production of hydrogen peroxide by neutrophils and macrophages. Interestingly, lidocaine with epinephrine potentiated the production of superoxide anion, whereas prilocaine with felypressine inhibited the production, irrespective of cells. In addition, epinephrine potentiated the production of superoxide anion, whereas epinephrine inhibited the production of hydrogen peroxide as well as lidocaine with epinephrine. This potentiation by epinephrine was not prevented by adrenergic antagonists. Furthermore, superoxide dismutase potentiated the production of hydrogen peroxide, which was in part prevented by epinephrine. These results suggest that local anesthetics may inhibit the functions related to natural immunity in neutrophils and macrophages. In addition, lidocaine with epinephrine evidently differs from prilocaine with felypressine regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of superoxide anion production by neutrophils and macrophages.</p>","PeriodicalId":84524,"journal":{"name":"Current drug targets. Immune, endocrine and metabolic disorders","volume":"4 1","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug targets. Immune, endocrine and metabolic disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1568008043339974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence that local anesthetics have immunological properties in addition to their direct anesthetic activity. Because local anesthetics are often used together with blood vessel contraction drugs, such as epinephrine and felypressin in the clinical setting, we have examined possible abilities of both local anesthetic alone including lidocaine, mepivacaine, procaine, prilocaine and tetracaine, and local anesthetics with blood vessel contraction drugs including lidocaine with epinephrine and prilocaine with felypressin on the functions related to natural immunity in neutrophils and macrophages. In contrast, lidocaine, mepivacaine, procaine, prilocaine and tetracaine all inhibited adhesion, chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the production of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide by neutrophils and macrophages. Lidocaine with epinephrine and prilocaine with felypressin were effective in significantly inhibiting adhesion, chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the production of hydrogen peroxide by neutrophils and macrophages. Interestingly, lidocaine with epinephrine potentiated the production of superoxide anion, whereas prilocaine with felypressine inhibited the production, irrespective of cells. In addition, epinephrine potentiated the production of superoxide anion, whereas epinephrine inhibited the production of hydrogen peroxide as well as lidocaine with epinephrine. This potentiation by epinephrine was not prevented by adrenergic antagonists. Furthermore, superoxide dismutase potentiated the production of hydrogen peroxide, which was in part prevented by epinephrine. These results suggest that local anesthetics may inhibit the functions related to natural immunity in neutrophils and macrophages. In addition, lidocaine with epinephrine evidently differs from prilocaine with felypressine regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of superoxide anion production by neutrophils and macrophages.

利多卡因-肾上腺素和丙胺卡因- felypresin对中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞自然免疫相关功能的免疫调节。
越来越多的证据表明,局麻药除了具有直接的麻醉活性外,还具有免疫特性。由于局麻药在临床中经常与血管收缩药物如肾上腺素和fely加压素一起使用,我们研究了局麻药单独使用(包括利多卡因、甲哌卡因、普鲁卡因、普利卡因和丁卡因)以及局麻药与血管收缩药物(包括利多卡因和肾上腺素、普利卡因和fely加压素)对中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞自然免疫相关功能的可能作用。相反,利多卡因、甲哌卡因、普鲁卡因、丙罗卡因和丁卡因均抑制中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞的粘附、趋化、吞噬以及超氧阴离子和过氧化氢的产生。利多卡因与肾上腺素和普利卡因与fely加压素可显著抑制中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞的粘附、趋化、吞噬和过氧化氢的产生。有趣的是,利多卡因与肾上腺素的结合增强了超氧阴离子的产生,而普利卡因与fely加压素的结合则抑制了超氧阴离子的产生,与细胞无关。此外,肾上腺素增强了超氧阴离子的产生,而肾上腺素抑制过氧化氢和利多卡因与肾上腺素的产生。肾上腺素的增强作用不能被肾上腺素能拮抗剂阻止。此外,超氧化物歧化酶增强了过氧化氢的产生,这在一定程度上是由肾上腺素阻止的。提示局麻药可能抑制中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞的自然免疫相关功能。此外,在中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞调节超氧阴离子产生的分子机制方面,利多卡因与肾上腺素的结合明显不同于丙胺卡因与felypresine的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信