Fishing line suture: cost-saving alternative for atraumatic intracutaneous skin closure--randomized clinical trial in Rwanda.

World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2004-04-01 Epub Date: 2004-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00268-003-7323-y
Sebastian Freudenberg, Martin Nyonde, Charles Mkony, Fatma Bay, Torsten Wilhelm, Stefan Post
{"title":"Fishing line suture: cost-saving alternative for atraumatic intracutaneous skin closure--randomized clinical trial in Rwanda.","authors":"Sebastian Freudenberg,&nbsp;Martin Nyonde,&nbsp;Charles Mkony,&nbsp;Fatma Bay,&nbsp;Torsten Wilhelm,&nbsp;Stefan Post","doi":"10.1007/s00268-003-7323-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experience with the use of nylon fishing line for surgical sutures has been reported from several African countries. A recent publication suggested that fishing line and an injection needle may provide an atraumatic suture that is especially suitable for intracutaneous skin closures. This article provides further empirical support for such alternative technology. We describe a randomized, blinded clinical trial conducted in Butare (Rwanda) with 220 cutaneous wounds closed by intracutaneous sutures, with either the homemade suture or a commercial nylon thread (Ethilon). We compared the clinical outcomes as well as the costs of those two materials. There are no significant differences between the two sutures in terms of clinical findings or in the reported ease of use by the surgeons. The cost of a homemade atraumatic suture is US $0.07, which is less than one-thirtieth the cost of the commercial thread. The advantage of the commercial thread is the assurance of quality. We consider whether this quality assurance justifies the large price difference, and if the homemade suture should be recommended to surgeons in countries where the costs of surgical material often remain an obstacle for life-saving operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":507313,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"421-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00268-003-7323-y","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-7323-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Experience with the use of nylon fishing line for surgical sutures has been reported from several African countries. A recent publication suggested that fishing line and an injection needle may provide an atraumatic suture that is especially suitable for intracutaneous skin closures. This article provides further empirical support for such alternative technology. We describe a randomized, blinded clinical trial conducted in Butare (Rwanda) with 220 cutaneous wounds closed by intracutaneous sutures, with either the homemade suture or a commercial nylon thread (Ethilon). We compared the clinical outcomes as well as the costs of those two materials. There are no significant differences between the two sutures in terms of clinical findings or in the reported ease of use by the surgeons. The cost of a homemade atraumatic suture is US $0.07, which is less than one-thirtieth the cost of the commercial thread. The advantage of the commercial thread is the assurance of quality. We consider whether this quality assurance justifies the large price difference, and if the homemade suture should be recommended to surgeons in countries where the costs of surgical material often remain an obstacle for life-saving operations.

鱼线缝合:节省成本的非创伤性皮内皮肤闭合替代方法——卢旺达随机临床试验
一些非洲国家报告了在手术缝合线中使用尼龙钓鱼线的经验。最近的一份出版物表明,钓鱼线和注射针可以提供一种非创伤性缝合,特别适用于皮内皮肤闭合。本文为这种替代技术提供了进一步的实证支持。我们描述了在Butare(卢旺达)进行的一项随机、盲法临床试验,用自制缝线或商用尼龙线(Ethilon)缝合220个皮肤伤口。我们比较了这两种材料的临床结果和成本。两种缝合线在临床表现或报告的外科医生使用的易用性方面没有显着差异。自制自动缝线的成本为0.07美元,不到商业线成本的三十分之一。商品线的优点是质量有保证。我们考虑这种质量保证是否证明了巨大的价格差异是合理的,以及在手术材料成本经常成为挽救生命手术障碍的国家,是否应该向外科医生推荐自制缝线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信