SOGC clinical practice guidelines: Canadian contraception consensus.

Amanda Black, Diane Francoeur, Timothy Rowe, John Collins, Dianne Miller, Thomas Brown, Michèle David, Sheila Dunn, William A Fisher, Nathalie Fleming, Claude A Fortin, Edith Guilbert, Louise Hanvey, André Lalonde, Ruth Miller, Margaret Morris, Teresa O'Grady, Helen Pymar, Thirza Smith, Elke Henneberg
{"title":"SOGC clinical practice guidelines: Canadian contraception consensus.","authors":"Amanda Black,&nbsp;Diane Francoeur,&nbsp;Timothy Rowe,&nbsp;John Collins,&nbsp;Dianne Miller,&nbsp;Thomas Brown,&nbsp;Michèle David,&nbsp;Sheila Dunn,&nbsp;William A Fisher,&nbsp;Nathalie Fleming,&nbsp;Claude A Fortin,&nbsp;Edith Guilbert,&nbsp;Louise Hanvey,&nbsp;André Lalonde,&nbsp;Ruth Miller,&nbsp;Margaret Morris,&nbsp;Teresa O'Grady,&nbsp;Helen Pymar,&nbsp;Thirza Smith,&nbsp;Elke Henneberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide guidelines for health-care providers on the use of contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Overall efficacy of cited contraceptive methods, assessing reduction in pregnancy rate, risk of infection, safety, ease of use, and side effects; the effect of cited contraceptive methods on sexual health and general well-being; and the cost and availability of cited contraceptive methods in Canada.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched for articles in English on subjects related to contraception, sexuality, and sexual health from January 1988 to March 2003, in order to update the Report of the Consensus Committee on Contraception published in May-July 1998. Relevant Canadian Government publications and position papers from appropriate health and family planning organizations were also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Values: </strong>The quality of the evidence is rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice are ranked according to the method described in this Report.</p>","PeriodicalId":520287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","volume":" ","pages":"219-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide guidelines for health-care providers on the use of contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.

Outcomes: Overall efficacy of cited contraceptive methods, assessing reduction in pregnancy rate, risk of infection, safety, ease of use, and side effects; the effect of cited contraceptive methods on sexual health and general well-being; and the cost and availability of cited contraceptive methods in Canada.

Evidence: Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched for articles in English on subjects related to contraception, sexuality, and sexual health from January 1988 to March 2003, in order to update the Report of the Consensus Committee on Contraception published in May-July 1998. Relevant Canadian Government publications and position papers from appropriate health and family planning organizations were also reviewed.

Values: The quality of the evidence is rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice are ranked according to the method described in this Report.

SOGC临床实践指南:加拿大避孕共识。
目的:为卫生保健提供者提供关于使用避孕方法预防怀孕和性传播疾病的指导方针。结果:所引用避孕方法的总体疗效,评估妊娠率降低、感染风险、安全性、易用性和副作用;列举的避孕方法对性健康和一般福祉的影响;以及在加拿大所引用的避孕方法的成本和可获得性。证据:从1988年1月到2003年3月,Medline和Cochrane数据库检索了与避孕、性行为和性健康相关的英文文章,以更新1998年5月至7月出版的《避孕共识委员会报告》。还审查了加拿大政府的有关出版物和有关保健和计划生育组织的立场文件。价值:根据加拿大定期健康检查工作队报告中描述的标准对证据的质量进行评级。根据本报告中描述的方法对实践建议进行排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信