Predeposit self-transfusion (PDS) in a hepatobiliopancreatic surgery (HBPS) unit: preliminary data.

Alejandro Serrablo, JosE Antonio Garcia-Erce, Rodolfo Serrablo, Elena Gonzalvo, JesUs MarIa Esarte
{"title":"Predeposit self-transfusion (PDS) in a hepatobiliopancreatic surgery (HBPS) unit: preliminary data.","authors":"Alejandro Serrablo,&nbsp;JosE Antonio Garcia-Erce,&nbsp;Rodolfo Serrablo,&nbsp;Elena Gonzalvo,&nbsp;JesUs MarIa Esarte","doi":"10.1007/s00534-002-0829-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery (HBPS) has high morbility and mortality and frequently requires blood transfusion. Allogeneic transfusion may cause adverse sequelae. Predeposit self-transfusiOn (PDS) minimizes allogeneic blood transfusion and avoids most adverse reactions. We present the preliminary data of our PDS experience (with recombinant human erythropoieting, r-HuEPO) in HBPS during the first year. We studied our first-year HBPS-PDS program by a retrospective review of the case histories and transfusion records in our Blood Bank. Sex, weight, underlying disease, packed red cell units (PRCUs) requested, drawn, and transfused, and hospital and ICU stays were analyzed. Nine patients were admitted in the PDS program. Of desired blood units, 83% was obtained, successfully in 77.8% of patients, and 63.2% were transfused with autologous blood transfusion. Only three patients needed allogeneic blood (33.3%). All complications occurred in patients who received allogeneic units. Also, we found stays were three times longer in those patients. PDS could be a valid and safe alternative for patients undergoing elective HBPS because it decreases allogeneic blood requirements, reduces overall complications, and also reduces hospital and ICU stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":15992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"10 2","pages":"183-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-002-0829-0","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-002-0829-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery (HBPS) has high morbility and mortality and frequently requires blood transfusion. Allogeneic transfusion may cause adverse sequelae. Predeposit self-transfusiOn (PDS) minimizes allogeneic blood transfusion and avoids most adverse reactions. We present the preliminary data of our PDS experience (with recombinant human erythropoieting, r-HuEPO) in HBPS during the first year. We studied our first-year HBPS-PDS program by a retrospective review of the case histories and transfusion records in our Blood Bank. Sex, weight, underlying disease, packed red cell units (PRCUs) requested, drawn, and transfused, and hospital and ICU stays were analyzed. Nine patients were admitted in the PDS program. Of desired blood units, 83% was obtained, successfully in 77.8% of patients, and 63.2% were transfused with autologous blood transfusion. Only three patients needed allogeneic blood (33.3%). All complications occurred in patients who received allogeneic units. Also, we found stays were three times longer in those patients. PDS could be a valid and safe alternative for patients undergoing elective HBPS because it decreases allogeneic blood requirements, reduces overall complications, and also reduces hospital and ICU stays.

肝胆胰外科(HBPS)单位的存款前自体输血(PDS):初步数据。
肝胆胰外科手术(HBPS)发病率和死亡率高,经常需要输血。异体输血可能引起不良的后遗症。存款前自体输血(PDS)最大限度地减少了异体输血,避免了大多数不良反应。我们提出了我们的PDS经验的初步数据(重组人促红细胞生成素,r-HuEPO)在第一年的HBPS。我们通过回顾性回顾血库的病例史和输血记录来研究第一年的HBPS-PDS项目。性别、体重、基础疾病、要求、抽取和输注的红细胞(prcu)、住院和ICU住院时间进行分析。9例患者被纳入PDS项目。获得所需血量的83%,77.8%的患者获得成功,63.2%的患者接受了自体输血。只有3例患者需要异基因血液(33.3%)。所有并发症均发生在接受同种异体单位治疗的患者中。此外,我们发现这些病人的住院时间是他们的三倍。PDS可能是选择性HBPS患者有效和安全的替代方案,因为它减少了异体血液需求,减少了总体并发症,也减少了住院和ICU的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信