Effect of visual imagery in COVID-19 social media posts on users' perception.

PeerJ Computer Science Pub Date : 2022-11-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.1153
Waleed M Al-Nuwaiser
{"title":"Effect of visual imagery in COVID-19 social media posts on users' perception.","authors":"Waleed M Al-Nuwaiser","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.1153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People receive a wide variety of news from social media. They especially look for information on social media in times of crisis with the desire to assess the risk they face. This risk assessment, and other aspects of user reactions, may be affected by characteristics of the social media post relaying certain information. Thus, it is critical to understand these characteristics to deliver information with the reactions in mind. This study investigated various types of imagery used as thumbnails in social media posts regarding news about the COVID-19 pandemic. In an experimental design, 300 participants viewed social media posts containing each of the three types of imagery: data visualization (directly about risk information), advisory (not containing direct risk information, but instead help on how to lower risk), or clickbait (containing no risk-related information, just generic visuals). After observing the social media posts, they answered questionnaires measuring their emotions (valence, arousal, and dominance), risk perception, perceived credibility of the post, and engagement. The participants also indicated their emotions towards and interest in COVID-19 news coverage, age, gender, and how often and actively they use social media. These variables acted as controls. The data were analysed using mixed linear models. Results indicated that advisory imagery positively influenced valence, arousal, dominance, credibility, and (lower) risk perception. Alternatively, imagery showing data visualizations yielded low valence, arousal, dominance, credibility, and high risk perception. Clickbait-styled thumbnails which carry no information are usually measured between the other two types. The type of imagery did not affect the motivation to engage with a post. Aside from visual imagery, most variables were affected by COVID sentiment and the usual activity on social media. These study results indicate that one should use advisory imagery for more comfortable news delivery and data visualization when the poster wishes to warn users of existing risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":503620,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ Computer Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680878/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

People receive a wide variety of news from social media. They especially look for information on social media in times of crisis with the desire to assess the risk they face. This risk assessment, and other aspects of user reactions, may be affected by characteristics of the social media post relaying certain information. Thus, it is critical to understand these characteristics to deliver information with the reactions in mind. This study investigated various types of imagery used as thumbnails in social media posts regarding news about the COVID-19 pandemic. In an experimental design, 300 participants viewed social media posts containing each of the three types of imagery: data visualization (directly about risk information), advisory (not containing direct risk information, but instead help on how to lower risk), or clickbait (containing no risk-related information, just generic visuals). After observing the social media posts, they answered questionnaires measuring their emotions (valence, arousal, and dominance), risk perception, perceived credibility of the post, and engagement. The participants also indicated their emotions towards and interest in COVID-19 news coverage, age, gender, and how often and actively they use social media. These variables acted as controls. The data were analysed using mixed linear models. Results indicated that advisory imagery positively influenced valence, arousal, dominance, credibility, and (lower) risk perception. Alternatively, imagery showing data visualizations yielded low valence, arousal, dominance, credibility, and high risk perception. Clickbait-styled thumbnails which carry no information are usually measured between the other two types. The type of imagery did not affect the motivation to engage with a post. Aside from visual imagery, most variables were affected by COVID sentiment and the usual activity on social media. These study results indicate that one should use advisory imagery for more comfortable news delivery and data visualization when the poster wishes to warn users of existing risks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19社交媒体帖子中视觉图像对用户感知的影响
人们从社交媒体上收到各种各样的新闻。在危机时刻,他们尤其会在社交媒体上寻找信息,以评估他们面临的风险。这种风险评估以及用户反应的其他方面可能会受到社交媒体转发某些信息的特征的影响。因此,理解这些特征对于传递信息时记住反应是至关重要的。这项研究调查了社交媒体帖子中关于COVID-19大流行新闻的各种缩略图。在一项实验设计中,300名参与者观看了包含三种类型图像的社交媒体帖子:数据可视化(直接关于风险信息),咨询(不包含直接的风险信息,而是如何降低风险的帮助),或标题党(不包含与风险相关的信息,只是一般的视觉效果)。在观察了社交媒体上的帖子后,他们回答了问卷,测量他们的情绪(效价、觉醒和支配)、风险感知、帖子的可信度和参与度。参与者还表明了他们对COVID-19新闻报道的情绪和兴趣、年龄、性别以及他们使用社交媒体的频率和活跃程度。这些变量作为控制。使用混合线性模型对数据进行分析。结果表明,咨询意象正向影响效价、唤醒、支配、可信度和(低)风险感知。另外,显示数据可视化的图像产生了低效价、唤醒、支配、可信度和高风险感知。点击诱饵风格的缩略图不携带任何信息,通常在其他两种类型之间进行衡量。图片的类型并不影响人们参与帖子的动机。除了视觉图像外,大多数变量都受到COVID情绪和社交媒体上的日常活动的影响。这些研究结果表明,当海报希望警告用户存在的风险时,应该使用咨询图像来更舒适地传递新闻和数据可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书