A New Exergy Disaggregation Approach for Complexity Reduction and Dissipative Equipment Isolation in Thermoeconomics.

IF 2
Rodrigo Guedes Dos Santos, Atilio Barbosa Lourenço, Pedro Rosseto de Faria, Marcelo Aiolfi Barone, José Joaquim Conceição Soares Santos
{"title":"A New Exergy Disaggregation Approach for Complexity Reduction and Dissipative Equipment Isolation in Thermoeconomics.","authors":"Rodrigo Guedes Dos Santos,&nbsp;Atilio Barbosa Lourenço,&nbsp;Pedro Rosseto de Faria,&nbsp;Marcelo Aiolfi Barone,&nbsp;José Joaquim Conceição Soares Santos","doi":"10.3390/e24111672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thermoeconomics connects thermodynamic and economic concepts in order to provide information not available in conventional energy and economic analysis. Most thermoeconomicists agree that exergy is the most appropriate thermodynamic magnitude to associate with cost. In some applications, exergy disaggregation is required. Despite the improvement in result accuracy, the modeling complexity increases. In recent years, different exergy disaggregation approaches have been proposed, mostly to deal with dissipative components and residues, despite all of them also increasing the complexity of thermoeconomics. This study aims to present a new thermoeconomic approach based on exergy disaggregation, which is able to isolate dissipative components with less modeling complexity. This approach, called the A&F Model, splits the physical exergy into two terms, namely, Helmholtz energy and flow work. These terms were evaluated from a thermoeconomic point of view, through a cost allocation in an ideal Carnot cycle, and they were also applied and compared with the UFS Model, through a cost allocation analysis, in a case study with an organic Rankine cycle-powered vapor compression refrigeration system. The complexity and computational effort reduction in the A&F are significantly less than in the UFS Model. This alternative approach yields consistent results.</p>","PeriodicalId":520609,"journal":{"name":"Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e24111672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermoeconomics connects thermodynamic and economic concepts in order to provide information not available in conventional energy and economic analysis. Most thermoeconomicists agree that exergy is the most appropriate thermodynamic magnitude to associate with cost. In some applications, exergy disaggregation is required. Despite the improvement in result accuracy, the modeling complexity increases. In recent years, different exergy disaggregation approaches have been proposed, mostly to deal with dissipative components and residues, despite all of them also increasing the complexity of thermoeconomics. This study aims to present a new thermoeconomic approach based on exergy disaggregation, which is able to isolate dissipative components with less modeling complexity. This approach, called the A&F Model, splits the physical exergy into two terms, namely, Helmholtz energy and flow work. These terms were evaluated from a thermoeconomic point of view, through a cost allocation in an ideal Carnot cycle, and they were also applied and compared with the UFS Model, through a cost allocation analysis, in a case study with an organic Rankine cycle-powered vapor compression refrigeration system. The complexity and computational effort reduction in the A&F are significantly less than in the UFS Model. This alternative approach yields consistent results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

热经济学中用于降低复杂性和隔离耗散设备的一种新的火用分解方法。
热经济学将热力学和经济学概念联系起来,以提供传统能源和经济分析中无法获得的信息。大多数热经济学家都认为,火用是与成本相关联的最合适的热力学量级。在某些应用中,需要用能分解。尽管结果精度提高了,但建模的复杂性也增加了。近年来,提出了不同的火用分解方法,主要是处理耗散成分和残余,尽管所有这些方法也增加了热经济学的复杂性。本研究旨在提出一种新的基于火能分解的热经济方法,该方法能够以较低的建模复杂性分离耗散分量。这种方法被称为A&F模型,它将物理能分为两项,即亥姆霍兹能和流动功。通过理想卡诺循环的成本分配,从热经济学的角度对这些术语进行了评估,并在有机朗肯循环驱动的蒸汽压缩制冷系统的案例研究中,通过成本分配分析,将它们与UFS模型进行了应用和比较。A&F模型的复杂性和计算量的减少明显小于UFS模型。这种替代方法产生一致的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书