Not a Problem at All or Excluded by Oneself, Doctors and the Law? Healthcare Workers' Perspectives on Access to HIV-Related Healthcare among Same-Sex Attracted Men in Tanzania.

IF 2.2 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Alexander Mwijage Ishungisa, Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch, Elia John Mmbaga, Melkizedeck Thomas Leshabari, Kåre Moen
{"title":"Not a Problem at All or Excluded by Oneself, Doctors and the Law? Healthcare Workers' Perspectives on Access to HIV-Related Healthcare among Same-Sex Attracted Men in Tanzania.","authors":"Alexander Mwijage Ishungisa,&nbsp;Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch,&nbsp;Elia John Mmbaga,&nbsp;Melkizedeck Thomas Leshabari,&nbsp;Kåre Moen","doi":"10.1177/23259582221121448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> An increasing body of literature focuses on access to healthcare services for men who engage in sex with other men in Africa, but how healthcare workers conceive of this topic of healthcare workers' views on men's care has not been much studied. Drawing on qualitative research, this article explores healthcare providers' perspectives on access to HIV-related healthcare services among gender and sexuality diverse men in Tanzania. <b>Methods:</b> A qualitative study was conducted among healthcare workers in Dar es Salaam and Tanga, Tanzania in 2018/2019. Data collection entailed qualitative interviewing, focus group discussions and participant observation. A purposive sampling strategy was used to select study participants who varied with respect to age, education level, work experience, and the type and location of the facilities they worked in. A total of 88 participants took part in the study. <b>Results:</b> This paper describes four different discourses that were identified among healthcare workers with respect to their perception of access to healthcare services for men who have sex with men. One held that access to healthcare was not a major problem, another that some same-sex attracted men did not utilize healthcare services although they were available to them, a third that some healthcare workers prevented these men from gaining access to healthcare and a fourth that healthcare for gender and sexual minority persons was made difficult by structural barriers. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although these are four rather different takes on the prevailing circumstances with respect to healthcare access for same-sex attracted men (SSAM), we suggest that they may all be \"true\" in the sense that they grasp and highlight different aspects of the same realities. More education is needed to healthcare providers to enable them accept SSAM who seek healthcare services and hence improve access to healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":17328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/80/c3/10.1177_23259582221121448.PMC9403446.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259582221121448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: An increasing body of literature focuses on access to healthcare services for men who engage in sex with other men in Africa, but how healthcare workers conceive of this topic of healthcare workers' views on men's care has not been much studied. Drawing on qualitative research, this article explores healthcare providers' perspectives on access to HIV-related healthcare services among gender and sexuality diverse men in Tanzania. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted among healthcare workers in Dar es Salaam and Tanga, Tanzania in 2018/2019. Data collection entailed qualitative interviewing, focus group discussions and participant observation. A purposive sampling strategy was used to select study participants who varied with respect to age, education level, work experience, and the type and location of the facilities they worked in. A total of 88 participants took part in the study. Results: This paper describes four different discourses that were identified among healthcare workers with respect to their perception of access to healthcare services for men who have sex with men. One held that access to healthcare was not a major problem, another that some same-sex attracted men did not utilize healthcare services although they were available to them, a third that some healthcare workers prevented these men from gaining access to healthcare and a fourth that healthcare for gender and sexual minority persons was made difficult by structural barriers. Conclusion: Although these are four rather different takes on the prevailing circumstances with respect to healthcare access for same-sex attracted men (SSAM), we suggest that they may all be "true" in the sense that they grasp and highlight different aspects of the same realities. More education is needed to healthcare providers to enable them accept SSAM who seek healthcare services and hence improve access to healthcare.

Abstract Image

根本不是问题,还是被自己、医生和法律排除在外?坦桑尼亚医护人员对同性男性获得艾滋病毒相关医疗保健的看法吸引了男性。
背景:越来越多的文献关注非洲与其他男性发生性行为的男性获得医疗保健服务的机会,但卫生保健工作者如何看待卫生保健工作者对男性护理的看法这一主题尚未得到太多研究。利用定性研究,本文探讨了医疗保健提供者对坦桑尼亚性别和性取向不同的男性获得艾滋病毒相关医疗保健服务的看法。方法:对2018/2019年坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆和坦噶的卫生保健工作者进行定性研究。数据收集包括定性访谈、焦点小组讨论和参与者观察。有目的的抽样策略用于选择年龄,教育水平,工作经验以及他们工作的设施的类型和位置不同的研究参与者。共有88名参与者参加了这项研究。结果:这篇论文描述了四种不同的话语,被确定在卫生保健工作者关于他们的看法获得卫生保健服务的男性与男性发生性关系。一个国家认为,获得医疗保健不是一个主要问题;另一个国家认为,一些同性吸引的男子虽然可以获得医疗保健服务,但他们不利用这些服务;第三个国家认为,一些医疗保健工作者阻止这些男子获得医疗保健服务;第四个国家认为,结构性障碍使性别和性少数群体难以获得医疗保健服务。结论:虽然这是关于同性吸引男性(SSAM)获得医疗保健的四种截然不同的普遍情况,但我们认为它们可能都是“真实的”,因为它们抓住并强调了相同现实的不同方面。医疗保健提供者需要更多的教育,使他们能够接受寻求医疗保健服务的SSAM,从而改善获得医疗保健的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信