Perception of integrating complementary and alternative medicine practice in patient's treatment among the healthcare practitioners: a systematic review.

The Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-13 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2022.43.19.31133
Azimatun Noor Aizuddin, Mohd 'Ammar Ihsan Ahmad Zamzuri, Juliana Mansor, Siti Rohani Nurumal, Sharifah Zawani Syed Ahmad Yunus, Mohamad Aznuddin Abd Razak, Mohd Nazrin Jamhari, Tong Seng Fah, Hazlina Mohd Miskam, Rozita Hod, Hanizah Mohd Yusoff
{"title":"Perception of integrating complementary and alternative medicine practice in patient's treatment among the healthcare practitioners: a systematic review.","authors":"Azimatun Noor Aizuddin, Mohd 'Ammar Ihsan Ahmad Zamzuri, Juliana Mansor, Siti Rohani Nurumal, Sharifah Zawani Syed Ahmad Yunus, Mohamad Aznuddin Abd Razak, Mohd Nazrin Jamhari, Tong Seng Fah, Hazlina Mohd Miskam, Rozita Hod, Hanizah Mohd Yusoff","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2022.43.19.31133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing trend in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage among the population with medical conditions. However, there is hesitancy for medical practitioners to integrate its application with the current treatment modality, despite governance by the authority. Hence, our objective is to systematically evaluate the healthcare perception towards integrating CAM in their practices. We systematically searched three large and renowned databases i.e., Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed, regarding \"Perception on Integrating CAM Usage in Patient's Treatment among Healthcare Practitioners\" from 2016 until 2020. At least two independent reviewers comprehensively screened and extracted the data from the accepted articles. A total of 15 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis following a strict and rigorous assessment checked using MMAT 2018 checklist. The studies included providing the richness of information due to the qualitative nature of the study design. There were three main domains extracted i.e. knowledge, attitude, and perspective of the healthcare practitioner towards CAM integration. Limited knowledge of CAM among healthcare providers may be the possible main reason for non-supportive attitude and negative perspective on CAM. However, those who showed an inclination towards CAM were found to be more open and ready to learn about CAM if it provides benefits to the patients. There is a heterogeneity of perception towards CAM integration from healthcare providers' point of view. A proactive and systematic CAM literacy awareness program may help to improve their understanding and possibly gain more trust in its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":131455,"journal":{"name":"The Pan African Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.43.19.31133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing trend in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage among the population with medical conditions. However, there is hesitancy for medical practitioners to integrate its application with the current treatment modality, despite governance by the authority. Hence, our objective is to systematically evaluate the healthcare perception towards integrating CAM in their practices. We systematically searched three large and renowned databases i.e., Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed, regarding "Perception on Integrating CAM Usage in Patient's Treatment among Healthcare Practitioners" from 2016 until 2020. At least two independent reviewers comprehensively screened and extracted the data from the accepted articles. A total of 15 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis following a strict and rigorous assessment checked using MMAT 2018 checklist. The studies included providing the richness of information due to the qualitative nature of the study design. There were three main domains extracted i.e. knowledge, attitude, and perspective of the healthcare practitioner towards CAM integration. Limited knowledge of CAM among healthcare providers may be the possible main reason for non-supportive attitude and negative perspective on CAM. However, those who showed an inclination towards CAM were found to be more open and ready to learn about CAM if it provides benefits to the patients. There is a heterogeneity of perception towards CAM integration from healthcare providers' point of view. A proactive and systematic CAM literacy awareness program may help to improve their understanding and possibly gain more trust in its application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

感知整合补充和替代医学实践在病人的治疗保健从业人员:一个系统的审查。
在有医疗条件的人群中,补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用呈增长趋势。然而,尽管有权威机构的管理,但医疗从业者对将其应用与当前的治疗方式相结合仍然犹豫不决。因此,我们的目标是系统地评估医疗保健对在他们的实践中整合CAM的看法。我们系统地检索了Scopus、Web of Science和PubMed三个大型知名数据库,从2016年到2020年,对“医疗从业者在患者治疗中整合CAM使用的看法”进行了检索。至少有两名独立审稿人全面筛选并从接受的文章中提取数据。在使用MMAT 2018检查表进行严格和严格的评估后,共有15项研究被纳入最终的定性综合。由于研究设计的定性性质,这些研究包括提供丰富的信息。提取了三个主要领域,即医疗保健从业者对CAM集成的知识、态度和观点。医疗保健提供者对辅助生殖疗法的知识有限可能是对辅助生殖疗法持不支持态度和消极看法的主要原因。然而,那些倾向于CAM的人被发现更开放,愿意学习CAM,如果它能给病人带来好处。从医疗保健提供者的角度来看,对CAM整合的看法存在异质性。一个积极的、系统的CAM读写意识项目可能有助于提高他们对CAM的理解,并可能在其应用中获得更多的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信