Toward Informed User Decisions About Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement.

IF 2.3
Polaris Koi
{"title":"Toward Informed User Decisions About Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement.","authors":"Polaris Koi","doi":"10.1017/S096318012200041X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE) refers to the use of pharmaceuticals to improve cognitive function when that use is not intended to prevent or treat disease. Those who favour a liberal approach to PCE trust users to make informed decisions about whether enhancing is in their best interest. The author argues that making informed decisions about PCE requires a nuanced risk-benefit analysis that is not accessible to many users. Presently, the PCE use of prescription medications such as methylphenidate and modafinil is widespread but most commonly happens without medical supervision. Direct and indirect barriers generate a situation where the risks and benefits of PCE are inequitably distributed; as a result, PCE is sometimes not in the user’s best interest. This is likely to also be the case for future pharmaceuticals. As a result, even if PCE pharmaceuticals were equitably distributed, its associated risks and benefits would not be. The article concludes with a discussion of the prospects of the clinical consultation on one hand, and e-health solutions on the other, in ameliorating the situation, arguing for cautious optimism.","PeriodicalId":520577,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees","volume":" ","pages":"545-556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318012200041X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE) refers to the use of pharmaceuticals to improve cognitive function when that use is not intended to prevent or treat disease. Those who favour a liberal approach to PCE trust users to make informed decisions about whether enhancing is in their best interest. The author argues that making informed decisions about PCE requires a nuanced risk-benefit analysis that is not accessible to many users. Presently, the PCE use of prescription medications such as methylphenidate and modafinil is widespread but most commonly happens without medical supervision. Direct and indirect barriers generate a situation where the risks and benefits of PCE are inequitably distributed; as a result, PCE is sometimes not in the user’s best interest. This is likely to also be the case for future pharmaceuticals. As a result, even if PCE pharmaceuticals were equitably distributed, its associated risks and benefits would not be. The article concludes with a discussion of the prospects of the clinical consultation on one hand, and e-health solutions on the other, in ameliorating the situation, arguing for cautious optimism.
关于药理认知增强的知情用户决策。
药理学认知增强(PCE)是指使用药物来改善认知功能,但这种使用不是为了预防或治疗疾病。那些赞成对PCE采取宽松方式的人相信,用户会在知情的情况下做出决定,判断增强PCE是否符合他们的最佳利益。作者认为,对PCE做出明智的决定需要细致入微的风险-收益分析,而这对许多用户来说是不可能的。目前,处方药物如哌甲酯和莫达非尼的PCE使用很普遍,但最常见的是在没有医疗监督的情况下发生。直接和间接的障碍造成了PCE的风险和收益分配不公平的情况;因此,PCE有时并不符合用户的最佳利益。未来的制药行业可能也会出现这种情况。因此,即使PCE药品公平分配,其相关的风险和收益也不会是公平的。文章最后讨论了临床咨询和电子医疗解决方案在改善这种状况方面的前景,并提出了谨慎乐观的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书