Identity, positionality and reflexivity: relevance and application to research paramedics.

Caitlin Wilson, Gillian Janes, Julia Williams
{"title":"Identity, positionality and reflexivity: relevance and application to research paramedics.","authors":"Caitlin Wilson,&nbsp;Gillian Janes,&nbsp;Julia Williams","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article introduces the reader to the concepts of identity, positionality and reflexivity and outlines their relevance to research paramedics. We outline how a researcher's identity and positionality can influence all aspects of research, including the research question, study design, data collection and data analysis. We discuss that the 'insider' position of paramedics conducting research with other paramedics or within their specific clinical setting has considerable benefits to participant access, understanding of data and dissemination, while highlighting the difficulties of role duality and power dynamics. While positionality is concerned with the researcher clearly stating their assumptions relating to the research topic, the research design, context and process, as well as the research participants; reflexivity involves the researcher questioning their assumptions and finding strategies to address these. The researcher must reflect upon the way the research is carried out and explain to the reader how they moved through the research processes to reach certain conclusions, with the aim of producing a trustworthy and honest account of the research. Throughout this article, we provide examples of how these concepts have been considered and applied by a research paramedic while conducting their PhD research studies within a pre-hospital setting, to illustrate how they can be applied practically.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":" ","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9662153/pdf/","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This article introduces the reader to the concepts of identity, positionality and reflexivity and outlines their relevance to research paramedics. We outline how a researcher's identity and positionality can influence all aspects of research, including the research question, study design, data collection and data analysis. We discuss that the 'insider' position of paramedics conducting research with other paramedics or within their specific clinical setting has considerable benefits to participant access, understanding of data and dissemination, while highlighting the difficulties of role duality and power dynamics. While positionality is concerned with the researcher clearly stating their assumptions relating to the research topic, the research design, context and process, as well as the research participants; reflexivity involves the researcher questioning their assumptions and finding strategies to address these. The researcher must reflect upon the way the research is carried out and explain to the reader how they moved through the research processes to reach certain conclusions, with the aim of producing a trustworthy and honest account of the research. Throughout this article, we provide examples of how these concepts have been considered and applied by a research paramedic while conducting their PhD research studies within a pre-hospital setting, to illustrate how they can be applied practically.

Abstract Image

身份、位置和反身性:对护理人员研究的相关性和应用。
这篇文章向读者介绍了身份,位置和反身性的概念,并概述了他们的相关性研究护理人员。我们概述了研究人员的身份和立场如何影响研究的各个方面,包括研究问题、研究设计、数据收集和数据分析。我们讨论了护理人员与其他护理人员或在他们特定的临床环境中进行研究的“内部”位置对参与者的访问、对数据的理解和传播有相当大的好处,同时强调了角色二元性和权力动力学的困难。而立场性则是研究人员清楚地陈述他们对研究主题、研究设计、背景和过程以及研究参与者的假设;反身性包括研究人员质疑他们的假设并寻找解决这些假设的策略。研究人员必须反思进行研究的方式,并向读者解释他们是如何通过研究过程得出某些结论的,目的是对研究进行可信和诚实的描述。在本文中,我们提供了一些例子,说明研究护理人员在院前环境中进行博士研究时如何考虑和应用这些概念,以说明如何实际应用这些概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信