Optimising a multi-strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial.

IF 5.5
Cassandra Lane, Luke Wolfenden, Alix Hall, Rachel Sutherland, Patti-Jean Naylor, Chris Oldmeadow, Lucy Leigh, Adam Shoesmith, Adrian Bauman, Nicole McCarthy, Nicole Nathan
{"title":"Optimising a multi-strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial.","authors":"Cassandra Lane, Luke Wolfenden, Alix Hall, Rachel Sutherland, Patti-Jean Naylor, Chris Oldmeadow, Lucy Leigh, Adam Shoesmith, Adrian Bauman, Nicole McCarthy, Nicole Nathan","doi":"10.1186/s12966-022-01345-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To maximise their potential health benefits, school-based physical activity policies need to be implemented at scale. This paper describes the third in a sequence of trials that sought to optimise an effective strategy (PACE) to assist schools' implementation of a physical activity policy. Specifically, it aimed to determine the probability that a multi-strategy intervention adapted to reduce in-person contact (Adapted PACE) was \"as good as\" the original intervention (PACE) in increasing the weekly minutes of structured physical activity implemented by classroom teachers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A noninferiority cluster randomised controlled trial was undertaken with 48 primary schools in New South Wales, Australia. Schools were randomised to receive PACE or a model with adaptations made to the delivery modes (Adapted PACE). Teachers' scheduled minutes of weekly physical activity was assessed at baseline (Oct 2018-Feb 2019) and 12-month follow-up (Oct-Dec 2019). The noninferiority margin was set at - 16.4 minutes based on previous data and decision panel consensus. A linear mixed model analysed within a Bayesian framework was used to explore noninferiority between the two PACE models. A cost minimisation analysis was conducted from the health service provider perspective, using the Australian dollar (AUD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The posterior estimate for the between group difference at follow-up was - 2.3 minutes (95% credible interval = - 18.02, 14.45 minutes). There was an estimated 96% probability of Adapted PACE being considered noninferior (only 4% of the posterior samples crossed the noninferiority margin of - 16.4 minutes). That is, the minutes of physical activity implemented by teachers at Adapted PACE schools was not meaningfully less than the minutes of physical activity implemented by teachers at PACE schools. The mean total cost was AUD$25,375 (95% uncertainty interval = $21,499, $29,106) for PACE and AUD$16,421 (95% uncertainty interval = $13,974, $19,656) for Adapted PACE; an estimated reduction of AUD$373 (95% uncertainty interval = $173, $560) per school.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is highly probable that Adapted PACE is noninferior to the original model. It is a cost-efficient alternative also likely to be a more suitable approach to supporting large scale implementation of school physical activity policies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001229167).</p>","PeriodicalId":520799,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity","volume":" ","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01345-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To maximise their potential health benefits, school-based physical activity policies need to be implemented at scale. This paper describes the third in a sequence of trials that sought to optimise an effective strategy (PACE) to assist schools' implementation of a physical activity policy. Specifically, it aimed to determine the probability that a multi-strategy intervention adapted to reduce in-person contact (Adapted PACE) was "as good as" the original intervention (PACE) in increasing the weekly minutes of structured physical activity implemented by classroom teachers.

Methods: A noninferiority cluster randomised controlled trial was undertaken with 48 primary schools in New South Wales, Australia. Schools were randomised to receive PACE or a model with adaptations made to the delivery modes (Adapted PACE). Teachers' scheduled minutes of weekly physical activity was assessed at baseline (Oct 2018-Feb 2019) and 12-month follow-up (Oct-Dec 2019). The noninferiority margin was set at - 16.4 minutes based on previous data and decision panel consensus. A linear mixed model analysed within a Bayesian framework was used to explore noninferiority between the two PACE models. A cost minimisation analysis was conducted from the health service provider perspective, using the Australian dollar (AUD).

Results: The posterior estimate for the between group difference at follow-up was - 2.3 minutes (95% credible interval = - 18.02, 14.45 minutes). There was an estimated 96% probability of Adapted PACE being considered noninferior (only 4% of the posterior samples crossed the noninferiority margin of - 16.4 minutes). That is, the minutes of physical activity implemented by teachers at Adapted PACE schools was not meaningfully less than the minutes of physical activity implemented by teachers at PACE schools. The mean total cost was AUD$25,375 (95% uncertainty interval = $21,499, $29,106) for PACE and AUD$16,421 (95% uncertainty interval = $13,974, $19,656) for Adapted PACE; an estimated reduction of AUD$373 (95% uncertainty interval = $173, $560) per school.

Conclusions: It is highly probable that Adapted PACE is noninferior to the original model. It is a cost-efficient alternative also likely to be a more suitable approach to supporting large scale implementation of school physical activity policies.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001229167).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化多策略实施干预以大规模改善学校体育活动政策的实施:一项随机非劣效性试验的结果。
背景:为了最大限度地发挥其潜在的健康效益,需要大规模实施以学校为基础的体育活动政策。本文描述了旨在优化有效策略(PACE)以帮助学校实施体育活动政策的一系列试验中的第三个。具体来说,它旨在确定减少面对面接触的多策略干预(适应性PACE)在增加课堂教师每周有组织的身体活动分钟数方面与原始干预(PACE)“一样好”的可能性。方法:对澳大利亚新南威尔士州48所小学进行非劣效性随机对照试验。学校被随机分配接受PACE或对交付模式进行调整的模式(改编PACE)。在基线(2018年10月- 2019年2月)和12个月的随访(2019年10月- 12月)中评估教师每周计划的体育活动时间。基于先前的数据和决策小组的共识,非劣效性差设定为- 16.4分钟。在贝叶斯框架内分析的线性混合模型用于探索两个PACE模型之间的非劣效性。从卫生服务提供者的角度,使用澳元(AUD)进行了成本最小化分析。结果:随访时组间差异的后验估计为- 2.3分钟(95%可信区间= - 18.02,14.45分钟)。适应性PACE被认为非劣效性的概率估计为96%(只有4%的后验样本越过了- 16.4分钟的非劣效性界限)。也就是说,适应性PACE学校教师实施的身体活动分钟数并不明显少于PACE学校教师实施的身体活动分钟数。PACE的平均总成本为25,375澳元(95%不确定区间= 21,499美元,29,106美元),改编PACE的平均总成本为16,421澳元(95%不确定区间= 13,974美元,19,656美元);估计每所学校减少373澳元(95%不确定区间= 173至560澳元)。结论:改编后的PACE极有可能不逊于原模型。这是一种具有成本效益的替代方案,也可能是支持大规模实施学校体育活动政策的更合适的方法。试验注册:在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心回顾性注册(ACTRN12619001229167)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书