Effects of Ultraviolet Treatment and Alendronate Immersion on Osseointegration of Dental Implants and Mucosal Attachment of Dental Implant Abutments.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tae Hyung Kim, Kyung Chul Oh, Hong Seok Moon
{"title":"Effects of Ultraviolet Treatment and Alendronate Immersion on Osseointegration of Dental Implants and Mucosal Attachment of Dental Implant Abutments.","authors":"Tae Hyung Kim,&nbsp;Kyung Chul Oh,&nbsp;Hong Seok Moon","doi":"10.11607/jomi.9626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of ultraviolet (UV) treatment and alendronate immersion on the osseointegration of dental implants and mucosal attachment of dental implant abutments using a mongrel dog model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 48 sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) titanium dental implants and 48 machined surface healing abutments in four male mongrel dogs were prepared. Implants and healing abutments were divided into four groups (n = 12 per group). The control (CON) group did not undergo additional surface treatments. The UV group was treated with UV for 15 minutes, and the alendronate-immersed (AN) group was soaked in 10-3 M alendronate for 24 hours. The UV treatment and alendronate soaking (UVAN) group was treated with alendronate, followed by UV irradiation. All implants were placed in the mandible of mongrel dogs, and the animals were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC), bone density, and connective tissue attachment were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cortical bone, the UV group exhibited significantly higher BIC compared to the CON and AN groups (P < .05). In contrast, the AN and UVAN groups did not have significantly higher BIC. In the trabecular bone, there was no statistical difference between the groups. No significant increase in bone density and connective tissue attachment was shown in any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UV treatment of SLA surface implants significantly increased osseointegration in cortical bone. The alendronate immersion did not increase osseointegration, and there was no synergic effect with UV treatment. Further, UV treatment and alendronate immersion of machined healing abutments did not significantly increase connective tissue attachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":"37 7","pages":"1151-1159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9626","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of ultraviolet (UV) treatment and alendronate immersion on the osseointegration of dental implants and mucosal attachment of dental implant abutments using a mongrel dog model.

Materials and methods: A total of 48 sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) titanium dental implants and 48 machined surface healing abutments in four male mongrel dogs were prepared. Implants and healing abutments were divided into four groups (n = 12 per group). The control (CON) group did not undergo additional surface treatments. The UV group was treated with UV for 15 minutes, and the alendronate-immersed (AN) group was soaked in 10-3 M alendronate for 24 hours. The UV treatment and alendronate soaking (UVAN) group was treated with alendronate, followed by UV irradiation. All implants were placed in the mandible of mongrel dogs, and the animals were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC), bone density, and connective tissue attachment were measured.

Results: In cortical bone, the UV group exhibited significantly higher BIC compared to the CON and AN groups (P < .05). In contrast, the AN and UVAN groups did not have significantly higher BIC. In the trabecular bone, there was no statistical difference between the groups. No significant increase in bone density and connective tissue attachment was shown in any group.

Conclusion: UV treatment of SLA surface implants significantly increased osseointegration in cortical bone. The alendronate immersion did not increase osseointegration, and there was no synergic effect with UV treatment. Further, UV treatment and alendronate immersion of machined healing abutments did not significantly increase connective tissue attachment.

紫外光处理和阿仑膦酸钠浸泡对种植体骨整合和种植基台粘膜附着的影响。
目的:采用杂种犬模型,观察紫外线照射和阿仑膦酸钠浸泡对种植体骨整合和种植基台粘膜附着的影响。材料与方法:在4只雄性杂种犬身上制备48颗喷砂、大粒度、酸蚀(SLA)钛牙种植体和48颗机械表面愈合基牙。种植体和愈合基台分为4组,每组12个。对照组(CON)不进行额外的表面处理。UV组用UV处理15分钟,阿仑膦酸浸泡(AN)组用10-3 M阿仑膦酸浸泡24小时。紫外光处理+阿仑膦酸浸泡(UVAN)组用阿仑膦酸治疗,再进行紫外光照射。所有种植体均放置于杂种犬下颌骨,于术后4周和8周处死。测量骨与种植体接触(BIC)、骨密度和结缔组织附着。结果:在皮质骨中,UV组的BIC值明显高于CON和AN组(P < 0.05)。相比之下,AN和UVAN组的BIC值没有明显升高。在骨小梁方面,两组间差异无统计学意义。在任何组中,骨密度和结缔组织附着均未显着增加。结论:UV处理可显著提高骨皮质骨的骨整合。阿仑膦酸钠浸泡对骨整合无促进作用,与紫外线处理无协同作用。此外,紫外线治疗和阿仑膦酸盐浸泡机器愈合基台没有显著增加结缔组织附着。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786 ISSN (Online): 1942-4434 This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信