Gavin Cowper, Stuart Goodall, Kirsty Hicks, Louise Burnie, Marc Briggs
{"title":"The impact of passive heat maintenance strategies between an active warm-up and performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gavin Cowper, Stuart Goodall, Kirsty Hicks, Louise Burnie, Marc Briggs","doi":"10.1186/s13102-022-00546-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior to exercise, a warm-up routine has been suggested to be an imperative factor in task readiness with the anticipation that it will enhance performance. One of the key benefits of a warm-up is the increase in muscle and core temperature, which can be achieved in a variety of ways. An effective way to achieve improvements in core and muscle temperature is by performing an active warm-up. However, lengthy transition periods between an active warm-up and exercise performance are known to cause a decline in core and muscle temperature, thereby reducing performance capability. As such, methods are needed to assist athletes during transition periods, to maintain the benefits of a warm-up with the aim of optimising performance. Accordingly, the purpose of this review is to systematically analyse the evidence base that has investigated the use of passive heating to aide sporting performance when a transition period is experienced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken following relevant studies being identified using PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO. Studies investigating the effects of passive heating strategies during the transition period between an active warm-up and exercise performance were included. The quality of the included studies were assessed by two independent reviewers using a modified version of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies, all high quality (mean = 7.6), reported sufficient data (quality score > 5) on the effects of passive heating strategies on exercise performance, these studies consisted of 85 well-trained athletes (78 male and 7 female). Passive heating strategies used between an active warm-up and exercise, significantly increased peak power output in all studies (ES = 0.54 [95% CI 0.17 to 0.91]). However, only a favourable trend was evident for exercise performance (ES = 1.07 [95% CI - 0.64 to 0.09]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based upon a limited number of well-conducted, randomised, controlled trials, it appears that passive heating strategies used between an active warm-up and exercise have a positive impact on peak power output. Although, additional research is necessary to determine the optimum procedure for passive warm-up strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520573,"journal":{"name":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375923/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00546-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: Prior to exercise, a warm-up routine has been suggested to be an imperative factor in task readiness with the anticipation that it will enhance performance. One of the key benefits of a warm-up is the increase in muscle and core temperature, which can be achieved in a variety of ways. An effective way to achieve improvements in core and muscle temperature is by performing an active warm-up. However, lengthy transition periods between an active warm-up and exercise performance are known to cause a decline in core and muscle temperature, thereby reducing performance capability. As such, methods are needed to assist athletes during transition periods, to maintain the benefits of a warm-up with the aim of optimising performance. Accordingly, the purpose of this review is to systematically analyse the evidence base that has investigated the use of passive heating to aide sporting performance when a transition period is experienced.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken following relevant studies being identified using PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO. Studies investigating the effects of passive heating strategies during the transition period between an active warm-up and exercise performance were included. The quality of the included studies were assessed by two independent reviewers using a modified version of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.
Results: Seven studies, all high quality (mean = 7.6), reported sufficient data (quality score > 5) on the effects of passive heating strategies on exercise performance, these studies consisted of 85 well-trained athletes (78 male and 7 female). Passive heating strategies used between an active warm-up and exercise, significantly increased peak power output in all studies (ES = 0.54 [95% CI 0.17 to 0.91]). However, only a favourable trend was evident for exercise performance (ES = 1.07 [95% CI - 0.64 to 0.09]).
Conclusions: Based upon a limited number of well-conducted, randomised, controlled trials, it appears that passive heating strategies used between an active warm-up and exercise have a positive impact on peak power output. Although, additional research is necessary to determine the optimum procedure for passive warm-up strategies.
背景:在锻炼之前,热身已经被认为是任务准备中必不可少的因素,预期它会提高表现。热身的主要好处之一是增加肌肉和核心温度,这可以通过多种方式实现。提高核心和肌肉温度的有效方法是进行积极的热身。然而,活跃热身和运动表现之间的长时间过渡会导致核心和肌肉温度下降,从而降低表现能力。因此,需要一些方法来帮助运动员在过渡时期保持热身的好处,以优化表现。因此,本综述的目的是系统地分析在经历过渡时期时使用被动加热来辅助运动表现的证据基础。方法:在PubMed、Web of Science和EBSCO中确认相关研究后,进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。研究调查了在主动热身和运动表现之间的过渡时期被动加热策略的影响。纳入研究的质量由两名独立评论者使用改良版的物理治疗证据数据库量表进行评估。结果:7项研究均为高质量研究(平均7.6),报告了足够的数据(质量评分> 5),研究对象为85名训练有素的运动员(男78名,女7名)。在所有研究中,在主动热身和运动之间使用被动加热策略,显著增加峰值功率输出(ES = 0.54 [95% CI 0.17至0.91])。然而,在运动表现方面只有明显的有利趋势(ES = 1.07 [95% CI - 0.64至0.09])。结论:基于有限数量的良好实施的随机对照试验,在主动热身和运动之间使用的被动加热策略似乎对峰值功率输出有积极影响。虽然,还需要进一步的研究来确定被动热身策略的最佳程序。