How does serif vs sans serif typeface impact the usability of e-commerce websites?

PeerJ Computer Science Pub Date : 2022-11-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.1139
Sara Vecino, Jonas Mehtali, Javier de Andrés, Martin Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Daniel Fernandez-Lanvin
{"title":"How does serif <i>vs</i> sans serif typeface impact the usability of e-commerce websites?","authors":"Sara Vecino,&nbsp;Jonas Mehtali,&nbsp;Javier de Andrés,&nbsp;Martin Gonzalez-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Daniel Fernandez-Lanvin","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.1139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study tries to find evidence that points towards the best typeface to use in e-commerce websites to maximize usability, trust, loyalty, appearance and overall user satisfaction. We tested the difference between serif and sans serif inside the same font family. A total of 246 volunteers participating in the experiment were asked to complete a set of tasks and a questionnaire on an e-commerce website prototype. We measured task completion time, reading speed and reading comprehension. From the results, using multiple linear regression, we deduced that only gender determines user preferences. Females tend to prefer the serif version of the typeface under study. Although most e-commerce websites use sans serif typefaces, we could not find evidence supporting this decision. The serif and sans serif characteristic inside the same font family does not affect usability on a website, as it was found that it has no impact on reading speed and user preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":503620,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ Computer Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680897/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study tries to find evidence that points towards the best typeface to use in e-commerce websites to maximize usability, trust, loyalty, appearance and overall user satisfaction. We tested the difference between serif and sans serif inside the same font family. A total of 246 volunteers participating in the experiment were asked to complete a set of tasks and a questionnaire on an e-commerce website prototype. We measured task completion time, reading speed and reading comprehension. From the results, using multiple linear regression, we deduced that only gender determines user preferences. Females tend to prefer the serif version of the typeface under study. Although most e-commerce websites use sans serif typefaces, we could not find evidence supporting this decision. The serif and sans serif characteristic inside the same font family does not affect usability on a website, as it was found that it has no impact on reading speed and user preference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

衬线字体和无衬线字体对电子商务网站的可用性有何影响?
本研究试图找到证据,指出在电子商务网站使用的最佳字体,以最大限度地提高可用性,信任,忠诚度,外观和整体用户满意度。我们在同一字体家族中测试了衬线体和无衬线体之间的区别。参与实验的246名志愿者被要求在一个电子商务网站原型上完成一系列任务和问卷调查。我们测量了任务完成时间、阅读速度和阅读理解能力。从结果中,使用多元线性回归,我们推断只有性别决定用户偏好。女性更喜欢研究中的衬线字体。虽然大多数电子商务网站使用无衬线字体,但我们找不到支持这一决定的证据。同一字体家族中的衬线体和无衬线体特性并不影响网站的可用性,因为研究发现它对阅读速度和用户偏好没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书