Consensus Statement Supporting the Presence of Onsite Radiation Oncology Departments at VHA Medical Centers.

Ruchika Gutt, Ronald H Shapiro, Steve P Lee, Katherine Faricy-Anderson, Lori Hoffman-Hogg, Abhishek A Solanki, Edwinette Moses, George A Dawson, Maria D Kelly
{"title":"Consensus Statement Supporting the Presence of Onsite Radiation Oncology Departments at VHA Medical Centers.","authors":"Ruchika Gutt,&nbsp;Ronald H Shapiro,&nbsp;Steve P Lee,&nbsp;Katherine Faricy-Anderson,&nbsp;Lori Hoffman-Hogg,&nbsp;Abhishek A Solanki,&nbsp;Edwinette Moses,&nbsp;George A Dawson,&nbsp;Maria D Kelly","doi":"10.12788/fp.0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although multiple studies demonstrate that radiotherapy is underused worldwide, the impact that onsite radiation oncology at medical centers has on the use of radiotherapy is poorly studied. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Palliative Radiotherapy Taskforce has evaluated the impact of onsite radiation therapy on the use of palliative radiation and has made recommendations based on these findings.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Radiation consults and treatment occur in a more timely manner at VHA centers with onsite radiation therapy compared with VHA centers without onsite radiation oncology. Referring practitioners with onsite radiation oncology less frequently report difficulty contacting a radiation oncologist (0% vs 20%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .006) and patient travel (28% vs 71%, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001) as barriers to referral for palliative radiotherapy. Facilities with onsite radiation oncology are more likely to have multidisciplinary tumor boards (31% vs 3%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .11) and are more likely to be influenced by radiation oncology recommendations at tumor boards (69% vs 44%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VHA Palliative Radiotherapy Taskforce recommends the optimization of the use of radiotherapy within the VHA. Radiation oncology services should be maintained where present in the VHA, with consideration for expansion of services to additional facilities. Telehealth should be used to expedite consults and treatment. Hypofractionation should be used, when appropriate, to ease travel burden. Options for transportation services and onsite housing or hospitalization should be understood by treating physicians and offered to patients to mitigate barriers related to travel.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":" ","pages":"S8-S11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9662312/pdf/fp-39-08s-s08.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although multiple studies demonstrate that radiotherapy is underused worldwide, the impact that onsite radiation oncology at medical centers has on the use of radiotherapy is poorly studied. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Palliative Radiotherapy Taskforce has evaluated the impact of onsite radiation therapy on the use of palliative radiation and has made recommendations based on these findings.

Observations: Radiation consults and treatment occur in a more timely manner at VHA centers with onsite radiation therapy compared with VHA centers without onsite radiation oncology. Referring practitioners with onsite radiation oncology less frequently report difficulty contacting a radiation oncologist (0% vs 20%, respectively; P = .006) and patient travel (28% vs 71%, respectively; P < .001) as barriers to referral for palliative radiotherapy. Facilities with onsite radiation oncology are more likely to have multidisciplinary tumor boards (31% vs 3%, respectively; P = .11) and are more likely to be influenced by radiation oncology recommendations at tumor boards (69% vs 44%, respectively; P = .02).

Conclusions: The VHA Palliative Radiotherapy Taskforce recommends the optimization of the use of radiotherapy within the VHA. Radiation oncology services should be maintained where present in the VHA, with consideration for expansion of services to additional facilities. Telehealth should be used to expedite consults and treatment. Hypofractionation should be used, when appropriate, to ease travel burden. Options for transportation services and onsite housing or hospitalization should be understood by treating physicians and offered to patients to mitigate barriers related to travel.

支持VHA医疗中心现场放射肿瘤科存在的共识声明。
背景:尽管多项研究表明,放疗在世界范围内未得到充分利用,但医疗中心现场放射肿瘤学对放疗使用的影响研究甚少。退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)姑息性放疗工作组评估了现场放射治疗对姑息性放疗使用的影响,并根据这些发现提出了建议。观察:与不进行现场放射肿瘤学治疗的VHA中心相比,现场放射治疗的VHA中心的放射咨询和治疗更及时。接受现场放射肿瘤学治疗的转诊医师较少报告难以联系放射肿瘤学家(分别为0%和20%);P = 0.006)和患者旅行(分别为28%对71%;P < 0.001)作为转诊姑息性放疗的障碍。拥有现场放射肿瘤学的机构更有可能拥有多学科肿瘤委员会(分别为31%和3%;P = 0.11),更有可能受到肿瘤委员会放射肿瘤学建议的影响(分别为69%对44%;P = .02)。结论:VHA姑息性放疗工作组建议在VHA内优化放疗的使用。放射肿瘤学服务应保留在VHA现有的地方,并考虑将服务扩展到其他设施。应利用远程保健加快咨询和治疗。适当时应使用低分割,以减轻旅行负担。治疗医生应了解交通服务和现场住宿或住院的选择,并向患者提供,以减轻与旅行有关的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信