Identifying Risk Factors, Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures, and Data Capture Tools for an Individualized Pain Prediction Tool in Pediatrics: Focus Group Study.

Michael D Wood, Nicholas C West, Rama S Sreepada, Kent C Loftsgard, Luba Petersen, Julie M Robillard, Patricia Page, Randa Ridgway, Neil K Chadha, Elodie Portales-Casamar, Matthias Görges
{"title":"Identifying Risk Factors, Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures, and Data Capture Tools for an Individualized Pain Prediction Tool in Pediatrics: Focus Group Study.","authors":"Michael D Wood,&nbsp;Nicholas C West,&nbsp;Rama S Sreepada,&nbsp;Kent C Loftsgard,&nbsp;Luba Petersen,&nbsp;Julie M Robillard,&nbsp;Patricia Page,&nbsp;Randa Ridgway,&nbsp;Neil K Chadha,&nbsp;Elodie Portales-Casamar,&nbsp;Matthias Görges","doi":"10.2196/42341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The perioperative period is a data-rich environment with potential for innovation through digital health tools and predictive analytics to optimize patients' health with targeted prehabilitation. Although some risk factors for postoperative pain following pediatric surgery are already known, the systematic use of preoperative information to guide personalized interventions is not yet widespread in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our long-term goal is to reduce the incidence of persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) and long-term opioid use in children by developing personalized pain risk prediction models that can guide clinicians and families to identify targeted prehabilitation strategies. To develop such a system, our first objective was to identify risk factors, outcomes, and relevant experience measures, as well as data collection tools, for a future data collection and risk modeling study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a patient-oriented research methodology, leveraging parental/caregiver and clinician expertise. We conducted virtual focus groups with participants recruited at a tertiary pediatric hospital; each session lasted approximately 1 hour and was composed of clinicians or family members (people with lived surgical experience and parents of children who had recently undergone a procedure requiring general anesthesia) or both. Data were analyzed thematically to identify potential risk factors for pain, as well as relevant patient-reported experience and outcome measures (PREMs and PROMs, respectively) that can be used to evaluate the progress of postoperative recovery at home. This guidance was combined with a targeted literature review to select tools to collect risk factor and outcome information for implementation in a future study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 22 participants (n=12, 55%, clinicians and n=10, 45%, family members) attended 10 focus group sessions; participants included 12 (55%) of 22 persons identifying as female, and 12 (55%) were under 50 years of age. Thematic analysis identified 5 key domains: (1) demographic risk factors, including both child and family characteristics; (2) psychosocial risk factors, including anxiety, depression, and medical phobias; (3) clinical risk factors, including length of hospital stay, procedure type, medications, and pre-existing conditions; (4) PREMs, including patient and family satisfaction with care; and (5) PROMs, including nausea and vomiting, functional recovery, and return to normal activities of daily living. Participants further suggested desirable functional requirements, including use of standardized and validated tools, and longitudinal data collection, as well as delivery modes, including electronic, parent proxy, and self-reporting, that can be used to capture these metrics, both in the hospital and following discharge. Established PREM/PROM questionnaires, pain-catastrophizing scales (PCSs), and substance use questionnaires for adolescents were subsequently selected for our proposed data collection platform.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study established 5 key data domains for identifying pain risk factors and evaluating postoperative recovery at home, as well as the functional requirements and delivery modes of selected tools with which to capture these metrics both in the hospital and after discharge. These tools have been implemented to generate data for the development of personalized pain risk prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e42341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709673/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/42341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The perioperative period is a data-rich environment with potential for innovation through digital health tools and predictive analytics to optimize patients' health with targeted prehabilitation. Although some risk factors for postoperative pain following pediatric surgery are already known, the systematic use of preoperative information to guide personalized interventions is not yet widespread in clinical practice.

Objective: Our long-term goal is to reduce the incidence of persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) and long-term opioid use in children by developing personalized pain risk prediction models that can guide clinicians and families to identify targeted prehabilitation strategies. To develop such a system, our first objective was to identify risk factors, outcomes, and relevant experience measures, as well as data collection tools, for a future data collection and risk modeling study.

Methods: This study used a patient-oriented research methodology, leveraging parental/caregiver and clinician expertise. We conducted virtual focus groups with participants recruited at a tertiary pediatric hospital; each session lasted approximately 1 hour and was composed of clinicians or family members (people with lived surgical experience and parents of children who had recently undergone a procedure requiring general anesthesia) or both. Data were analyzed thematically to identify potential risk factors for pain, as well as relevant patient-reported experience and outcome measures (PREMs and PROMs, respectively) that can be used to evaluate the progress of postoperative recovery at home. This guidance was combined with a targeted literature review to select tools to collect risk factor and outcome information for implementation in a future study.

Results: In total, 22 participants (n=12, 55%, clinicians and n=10, 45%, family members) attended 10 focus group sessions; participants included 12 (55%) of 22 persons identifying as female, and 12 (55%) were under 50 years of age. Thematic analysis identified 5 key domains: (1) demographic risk factors, including both child and family characteristics; (2) psychosocial risk factors, including anxiety, depression, and medical phobias; (3) clinical risk factors, including length of hospital stay, procedure type, medications, and pre-existing conditions; (4) PREMs, including patient and family satisfaction with care; and (5) PROMs, including nausea and vomiting, functional recovery, and return to normal activities of daily living. Participants further suggested desirable functional requirements, including use of standardized and validated tools, and longitudinal data collection, as well as delivery modes, including electronic, parent proxy, and self-reporting, that can be used to capture these metrics, both in the hospital and following discharge. Established PREM/PROM questionnaires, pain-catastrophizing scales (PCSs), and substance use questionnaires for adolescents were subsequently selected for our proposed data collection platform.

Conclusions: This study established 5 key data domains for identifying pain risk factors and evaluating postoperative recovery at home, as well as the functional requirements and delivery modes of selected tools with which to capture these metrics both in the hospital and after discharge. These tools have been implemented to generate data for the development of personalized pain risk prediction models.

Abstract Image

识别风险因素,患者报告的经验和结果测量,以及个性化儿科疼痛预测工具的数据采集工具:焦点小组研究。
背景:围手术期是一个数据丰富的环境,有潜力通过数字健康工具和预测分析来优化患者的健康和有针对性的康复。虽然已经知道一些儿童手术后疼痛的危险因素,但在临床实践中,系统地使用术前信息来指导个性化干预措施尚未广泛应用。目的:我们的长期目标是通过开发个性化的疼痛风险预测模型,指导临床医生和家庭确定有针对性的康复策略,减少儿童术后持续性疼痛(PPSP)和长期阿片类药物使用的发生率。为了开发这样一个系统,我们的第一个目标是确定风险因素、结果和相关的经验措施,以及数据收集工具,用于未来的数据收集和风险建模研究。方法:本研究采用以患者为导向的研究方法,利用父母/照顾者和临床医生的专业知识。我们对在一家三级儿科医院招募的参与者进行了虚拟焦点小组;每次会议持续约1小时,由临床医生或家庭成员(有手术经验的人和最近接受过全麻手术的儿童的父母)或两者共同组成。对数据进行主题分析,以确定疼痛的潜在危险因素,以及相关的患者报告的经历和结果测量(分别为PREMs和PROMs),可用于评估术后在家恢复的进展。该指南与有针对性的文献综述相结合,以选择工具来收集风险因素和结果信息,以便在未来的研究中实施。结果:共有22名参与者(n=12, 55%,临床医生,n=10, 45%,家庭成员)参加了10次焦点小组会议;参与者包括22人中12人(55%)为女性,12人(55%)年龄在50岁以下。专题分析确定了5个关键领域:(1)人口风险因素,包括儿童和家庭特征;(2)社会心理风险因素,包括焦虑、抑郁和医疗恐惧症;(3)临床风险因素,包括住院时间、手术类型、药物和既往病史;(4) PREMs,包括患者和家属对护理的满意度;(5) PROMs,包括恶心和呕吐,功能恢复,恢复正常的日常生活活动。与会者进一步提出了可取的功能要求,包括使用标准化和经过验证的工具,纵向数据收集,以及可用于在医院和出院后捕获这些指标的交付模式,包括电子、家长代理和自我报告。随后选择已建立的PREM/PROM问卷,疼痛灾难量表(PCSs)和青少年物质使用问卷作为我们提出的数据收集平台。结论:本研究建立了5个关键数据域,用于识别疼痛风险因素和评估术后在家康复,以及在医院和出院后捕获这些指标所选择的工具的功能要求和交付模式。这些工具已被用于为个性化疼痛风险预测模型的开发生成数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信