Satisfaction in conventional acrylic complete denture patient with and without denture liners - a systematic review.

The Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2022.42.296.33035
Jayesh Shinde, Tushar Mowade, Priya Gupta, Rahul Tekale, Neelam Pande, Kalyani Deshmukh, Twinkle Lokhande, Usha Radke
{"title":"Satisfaction in conventional acrylic complete denture patient with and without denture liners - a systematic review.","authors":"Jayesh Shinde, Tushar Mowade, Priya Gupta, Rahul Tekale, Neelam Pande, Kalyani Deshmukh, Twinkle Lokhande, Usha Radke","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2022.42.296.33035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To make a new complete denture, a series of steps is needed, and it is a time-consuming process. Which is not possible in every patient due to financial and medical reasons. The old denture can be relined by denture liners in less clinical and laboratory steps and can successfully increase the efficiency of ill-fitting dentures however, patient satisfaction with denture liners is doubtful. This systematic review was organized from the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews' checklist, and the methods were registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO- CRD42020210227). The main systematic review is to assess satisfaction in convectional acrylic complete denture with or without denture liners. Search engines such as PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, Ovid, and Google Scholar were used to extract information. The risk of bias was measured with the help of the Cochrane collaboration tool. Initially we found 1711 articles out of which 6 were finalised as per PICO criteria. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using a visual analogue scale and questionnaire method, which shows denture liners group has more patient satisfaction. Acrylic denture liner and silicon denture liner shows better patient satisfaction compared to the conventional acrylic denture. Among denture liners, there is no significant difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":131455,"journal":{"name":"The Pan African Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.42.296.33035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To make a new complete denture, a series of steps is needed, and it is a time-consuming process. Which is not possible in every patient due to financial and medical reasons. The old denture can be relined by denture liners in less clinical and laboratory steps and can successfully increase the efficiency of ill-fitting dentures however, patient satisfaction with denture liners is doubtful. This systematic review was organized from the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews' checklist, and the methods were registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO- CRD42020210227). The main systematic review is to assess satisfaction in convectional acrylic complete denture with or without denture liners. Search engines such as PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, Ovid, and Google Scholar were used to extract information. The risk of bias was measured with the help of the Cochrane collaboration tool. Initially we found 1711 articles out of which 6 were finalised as per PICO criteria. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using a visual analogue scale and questionnaire method, which shows denture liners group has more patient satisfaction. Acrylic denture liner and silicon denture liner shows better patient satisfaction compared to the conventional acrylic denture. Among denture liners, there is no significant difference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

常规丙烯全口义齿有和无义齿衬套患者满意度的系统评价。
制作一个新的全口义齿需要一系列的步骤,而且是一个耗时的过程。由于经济和医疗原因,并不是每个病人都能做到这一点。使用义齿衬套修补旧义齿的临床和实验室步骤较少,可以成功提高义齿不合适的效率,但患者对义齿衬套的满意度令人怀疑。本系统综述根据系统综述清单的首选报告项目进行组织,方法已在国际前瞻性系统综述登记册(PROSPERO- CRD42020210227)上注册。主要的系统回顾是评估常规丙烯酸全口义齿有或没有义齿衬套的满意度。使用PubMed、Science Direct、Cochrane、Ovid和b谷歌Scholar等搜索引擎提取信息。偏倚风险在Cochrane协作工具的帮助下进行测量。最初,我们发现了1711篇文章,其中6篇是根据PICO标准最终确定的。采用视觉模拟量表和问卷调查法对患者满意度进行评价,结果显示义齿衬套组患者满意度较高。与传统的丙烯酸义齿衬套相比,丙烯酸义齿衬套和硅义齿衬套的患者满意度更高。各义齿衬套间无显著性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信