New strategy for the identification of prostate cancer: The combination of Proclarix and the prostate health index.

The Prostate Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-16 DOI:10.1002/pros.24422
Daniela Terracciano, Evelina La Civita, Alcibiade Athanasiou, Antonietta Liotti, Mariano Fiorenza, Michele Cennamo, Felice Crocetto, Pierre Tennstedt, Ralph Schiess, Alexander Haese, Matteo Ferro, Thomas Steuber
{"title":"New strategy for the identification of prostate cancer: The combination of Proclarix and the prostate health index.","authors":"Daniela Terracciano,&nbsp;Evelina La Civita,&nbsp;Alcibiade Athanasiou,&nbsp;Antonietta Liotti,&nbsp;Mariano Fiorenza,&nbsp;Michele Cennamo,&nbsp;Felice Crocetto,&nbsp;Pierre Tennstedt,&nbsp;Ralph Schiess,&nbsp;Alexander Haese,&nbsp;Matteo Ferro,&nbsp;Thomas Steuber","doi":"10.1002/pros.24422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prostate health index (PHI) and, more recently, Proclarix have been proposed as serum biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate Proclarix and PHI for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Proclarix and PHI were measured using samples of 344 men from two different centers. All patients underwent prostate biopsy, and among those, 188 men with PCa on biopsy had an additional radical prostatectomy (RP). All men had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 2 and 10 ng/ml. Evaluation of area under the curve (AUC) and performance at predefined cut-offs of Proclarix and PHI risk scores as well as the linear combination thereof was performed to predict csPCa. PSA density was used as an independent comparator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort median age and PSA were 65 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-71) and 5.6 (IQR: 4.3-7.2) ng/ml, respectively. CsPCa was diagnosed in 161 (47%) men based on the RP specimen. ROC analysis showed that Proclarix and PHI accurately predicted csPCa with no significant difference (AUC of 0.79 and 0.76, p = 0.378) but significantly better when compared to PSA density (AUC of 0.66, p < 0.001). When using specific cut-offs, Proclarix (cut-off 10) revealed higher specificity and positive predictive value than PHI (cut-off 27) at similar sensitivities. The combination of Proclarix and PHI provided a significant increase in the AUC (p ≤ 0.007) compared to the individual tests alone and the highest clinical benefit was achieved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results of this study show that both Proclarix and PHI accurately detect the presence of csPCa. The model combining Proclarix and PHI revealed the synergistic effect and improved the diagnostic performance of the individual tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"1469-1476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives: Prostate health index (PHI) and, more recently, Proclarix have been proposed as serum biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate Proclarix and PHI for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

Patients and methods: Proclarix and PHI were measured using samples of 344 men from two different centers. All patients underwent prostate biopsy, and among those, 188 men with PCa on biopsy had an additional radical prostatectomy (RP). All men had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 2 and 10 ng/ml. Evaluation of area under the curve (AUC) and performance at predefined cut-offs of Proclarix and PHI risk scores as well as the linear combination thereof was performed to predict csPCa. PSA density was used as an independent comparator.

Results: The cohort median age and PSA were 65 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-71) and 5.6 (IQR: 4.3-7.2) ng/ml, respectively. CsPCa was diagnosed in 161 (47%) men based on the RP specimen. ROC analysis showed that Proclarix and PHI accurately predicted csPCa with no significant difference (AUC of 0.79 and 0.76, p = 0.378) but significantly better when compared to PSA density (AUC of 0.66, p < 0.001). When using specific cut-offs, Proclarix (cut-off 10) revealed higher specificity and positive predictive value than PHI (cut-off 27) at similar sensitivities. The combination of Proclarix and PHI provided a significant increase in the AUC (p ≤ 0.007) compared to the individual tests alone and the highest clinical benefit was achieved.

Conclusion: Results of this study show that both Proclarix and PHI accurately detect the presence of csPCa. The model combining Proclarix and PHI revealed the synergistic effect and improved the diagnostic performance of the individual tests.

前列腺癌鉴别新策略:Proclarix与前列腺健康指数联合应用。
目的:前列腺健康指数(PHI)和最近提出的Proclarix作为前列腺癌(PCa)的血清生物标志物。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估Proclarix和PHI在预测临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)中的作用。患者和方法:使用来自两个不同中心的344名男性样本测量proclarx和PHI。所有的患者都进行了前列腺活检,其中188名前列腺癌活检患者进行了额外的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)。所有男性的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)在2 - 10 ng/ml之间。评估曲线下面积(AUC)和Proclarix和PHI风险评分在预定义截止点的表现,以及它们的线性组合,以预测csPCa。PSA密度作为独立比较指标。结果:队列中位年龄和PSA分别为65(四分位数范围[IQR]: 60-71)和5.6 (IQR: 4.3-7.2) ng/ml。基于RP标本,161例(47%)男性被诊断为CsPCa。ROC分析显示,Proclarix和PHI准确预测csPCa,差异无统计学意义(AUC分别为0.79和0.76,p = 0.378),但与PSA密度相比有显著性提高(AUC为0.66,p)。结论:本研究结果显示Proclarix和PHI均能准确检测csPCa的存在。Proclarix与PHI的联合模型显示出协同效应,提高了单项测试的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书