Enriching the Theory and Practice of Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation.

Elizabeth Lanphier, Uchenna E Anani
{"title":"Enriching the Theory and Practice of Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation.","authors":"Elizabeth Lanphier, Uchenna E Anani","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2022.2110991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are grateful for the excellent and incisive commentaries on our paper “Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation” (Lanphier and Anani 2022). It is heartening to see most commentators agree with why clinical ethics consultation should be trauma informed, and rightly raise relevant complexities for trauma informed ethics consultation (TIEC) that allow us to clarify and build upon our argument. Many responses introduce questions of how to achieve TIEC as well as how TIEC can support social justice, improved outcomes, and health equity in a variety of settings. Through our research, we recognize that the theoretical objectives of both ethics consultation and trauma informed care (TIC) can be challenging to translate into concrete practice. To some extent, this is due to the idiosyncratic nature of the situations and stories that contribute to both trauma histories, and ethical dilemmas, as well as the diverse responses by individuals and groups to trauma and ethics consultation. Although each ethical dilemma or trauma history is unique, they can align with recognizable patterns requiring a set of core competencies, knowledges, and skills designed to appropriately approach each novel iteration. Thus, we have frameworks like the American Society for Bioethics Core Competencies for Clinical Ethics Consultation (2011), and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s “Four Rs” and “Six Principles” of TIC (SAMHSA 2014). We draw from these and other frameworks to show not only the complementarity of trauma informed care in ethics consultation, but also its necessity. The next step is translating these frameworks, competencies, or principles into action. In our target article, we began to sketch how TIC could be implemented into ethics consultation using a case in the NICU, but by no means believe that it ought to be limited to neonatal, or even pediatric healthcare. Thankfully, many of our commentators further developed approaches from their specific areas of expertise.","PeriodicalId":145777,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","volume":" ","pages":"W7-W9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2110991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We are grateful for the excellent and incisive commentaries on our paper “Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation” (Lanphier and Anani 2022). It is heartening to see most commentators agree with why clinical ethics consultation should be trauma informed, and rightly raise relevant complexities for trauma informed ethics consultation (TIEC) that allow us to clarify and build upon our argument. Many responses introduce questions of how to achieve TIEC as well as how TIEC can support social justice, improved outcomes, and health equity in a variety of settings. Through our research, we recognize that the theoretical objectives of both ethics consultation and trauma informed care (TIC) can be challenging to translate into concrete practice. To some extent, this is due to the idiosyncratic nature of the situations and stories that contribute to both trauma histories, and ethical dilemmas, as well as the diverse responses by individuals and groups to trauma and ethics consultation. Although each ethical dilemma or trauma history is unique, they can align with recognizable patterns requiring a set of core competencies, knowledges, and skills designed to appropriately approach each novel iteration. Thus, we have frameworks like the American Society for Bioethics Core Competencies for Clinical Ethics Consultation (2011), and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s “Four Rs” and “Six Principles” of TIC (SAMHSA 2014). We draw from these and other frameworks to show not only the complementarity of trauma informed care in ethics consultation, but also its necessity. The next step is translating these frameworks, competencies, or principles into action. In our target article, we began to sketch how TIC could be implemented into ethics consultation using a case in the NICU, but by no means believe that it ought to be limited to neonatal, or even pediatric healthcare. Thankfully, many of our commentators further developed approaches from their specific areas of expertise.
丰富创伤知情伦理咨询的理论与实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信