Nils Correvon, Lucas Fasquel, Pouyan Yazdani, Jean-Bernard Michotte, Jonathan Dugernier, Olivier Contal
{"title":"Impact of additional HEPA filter on APAP performance and CPAP pressure level in simulated sleep apnea events.","authors":"Nils Correvon, Lucas Fasquel, Pouyan Yazdani, Jean-Bernard Michotte, Jonathan Dugernier, Olivier Contal","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2022.891390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CPAP is the first line treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Recently, the use of added filters has been debated following the field safety notice of Philips Respironics™ on potential health risks due to foam degradation used in their ventilators. However, the added resistance of filters has never been analyzed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary aim was to investigate the impact of four different filters on APAP mode performance with and without added unintentional air leaks (UIAL) with two simulated respiratory events. The secondary aim was to assess the pressure drop due to the increased filter resistance at different fixed CPAP pressure levels.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a bench study. Performance tests were performed on a breathing simulator (ASL 5000™) with a DreamStation™ device. To assess the combined effect of UIAL, a controlled valve was added to the setup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without UIAL, the algorithm was able to detect respiratory events and increase pressure level consequently. In the presence of UIAL, the device's response to simulated events was affected. In fixed CPAP mode, the median measured end-expiratory pressure was 6.2 to 10.0% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) below the set pressure with the additional filters. Additional UIAL severely impacted the delivered pressure with a median reduction up to 28.3% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) to the set pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a slight pressure drop, the APAP algorithm still performed with additional filters when UIAL were avoided. However, the combined effect of added filter resistance and UIAL severely impacted APAP performance and effectively delivered set pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12599,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","volume":" ","pages":"891390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.891390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: CPAP is the first line treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Recently, the use of added filters has been debated following the field safety notice of Philips Respironics™ on potential health risks due to foam degradation used in their ventilators. However, the added resistance of filters has never been analyzed.
Objectives: The primary aim was to investigate the impact of four different filters on APAP mode performance with and without added unintentional air leaks (UIAL) with two simulated respiratory events. The secondary aim was to assess the pressure drop due to the increased filter resistance at different fixed CPAP pressure levels.
Method: This is a bench study. Performance tests were performed on a breathing simulator (ASL 5000™) with a DreamStation™ device. To assess the combined effect of UIAL, a controlled valve was added to the setup.
Results: Without UIAL, the algorithm was able to detect respiratory events and increase pressure level consequently. In the presence of UIAL, the device's response to simulated events was affected. In fixed CPAP mode, the median measured end-expiratory pressure was 6.2 to 10.0% (p < 0.001) below the set pressure with the additional filters. Additional UIAL severely impacted the delivered pressure with a median reduction up to 28.3% (p < 0.001) to the set pressure.
Conclusion: Despite a slight pressure drop, the APAP algorithm still performed with additional filters when UIAL were avoided. However, the combined effect of added filter resistance and UIAL severely impacted APAP performance and effectively delivered set pressure.