Leaving child and adolescent mental health services in the MILESTONE cohort: a longitudinal cohort study on young people's mental health indicators, care pathways, and outcomes in Europe.

Suzanne E Gerritsen, Larissa S van Bodegom, Mathilde M Overbeek, Athanasios Maras, Frank C Verhulst, Dieter Wolke, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Giovanni de Girolamo, Tomislav Franić, Jason Madan, Fiona McNicholas, Moli Paul, Diane Purper-Ouakil, Paramala J Santosh, Ulrike M E Schulze, Swaran P Singh, Cathy Street, Sabine Tremmery, Helena Tuomainen, Gwendolyn C Dieleman
{"title":"Leaving child and adolescent mental health services in the MILESTONE cohort: a longitudinal cohort study on young people's mental health indicators, care pathways, and outcomes in Europe.","authors":"Suzanne E Gerritsen,&nbsp;Larissa S van Bodegom,&nbsp;Mathilde M Overbeek,&nbsp;Athanasios Maras,&nbsp;Frank C Verhulst,&nbsp;Dieter Wolke,&nbsp;Dimitris Rizopoulos,&nbsp;Giovanni de Girolamo,&nbsp;Tomislav Franić,&nbsp;Jason Madan,&nbsp;Fiona McNicholas,&nbsp;Moli Paul,&nbsp;Diane Purper-Ouakil,&nbsp;Paramala J Santosh,&nbsp;Ulrike M E Schulze,&nbsp;Swaran P Singh,&nbsp;Cathy Street,&nbsp;Sabine Tremmery,&nbsp;Helena Tuomainen,&nbsp;Gwendolyn C Dieleman","doi":"10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00310-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The configuration of having separate mental health services by age, namely child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) and adult mental health services (AMHS), might be a barrier to continuity of care that adversely affects young people's mental health. However, no studies have investigated whether discontinuity of care in the transition period affects mental health. We aimed to discern the type of care young people receive after reaching the upper age limit of their CAMHS and examine differences in outcomes at 24-month follow-up between young people receiving different types of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess mental health in young people from 39 CAMHS in eight European countries (Belgium, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, and the UK), we did a longitudinal cohort study. Eligible young people were CAMHS users up to 1 year younger than the upper age limit of their CAMHS or up to 3 months older, if they were still in CAMHS. Information on mental health service use, mental health problems (ie, using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents, Youth Self-Report and Adult Self-Report, DSM-5, and ICD-10), and sociodemographic characteristics were collected using self-reported, parent-reported, and clinician-reported interviews and questionnaires. Mixed models were applied to assess relationships between baseline characteristics, mental health service use, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The MILESTONE cohort included 763 young people. The participants were 60·0% female (n=458) and 40·0% male (n=305), 90·3% White (n=578), and had a mean age of 17·5 years (range 15·2-19·6 years). Over the 24-month follow-up period, 48 young people (6·3%) actively withdrew from the study. For young people, the higher their scores on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (p=0·0009) and Youth Self-Report and Adult Self-Report (p=0·046), and who had a clinical classification of severe mental illness (p=0·0033), had suicidal thoughts or behaviours or self-harm (p=0·034), used psychotropic medication (p=0·0014), and had a self-reported or parent-reported need for continued treatment (p&lt;0·0001) at baseline, were more likely to transition to AMHS or stay in CAMHS than to have care end. Overall, over the 24-month follow-up period, the mental health of young people improved, but 24·4% of young people reported an increase in problems calculated using the reliable change index, of whom 5·3% had a clinically relevant increase in problems. At 24-month follow-up, no differences in change in mental health problems since baseline were found between young people who used different types of care (CAMHS, AMHS, or no care).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Although approximately half of young people reaching the upper age limit of their CAMHS stop using mental health services, this was not associated with a deterioration in their mental health. Young people with the most severe mental health problems are more likely to receive continued care. If replicated, our findings suggest investments in improving transitional care for all CAMHS users might not be cost-effective in times of rising health-care costs, but might be better targeted at a subgroup of young people with increasing mental health problems who do not receive continued treatment.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>European Commission's 7th Framework Programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":240194,"journal":{"name":"The lancet. Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"944-956"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The lancet. Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00310-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The configuration of having separate mental health services by age, namely child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) and adult mental health services (AMHS), might be a barrier to continuity of care that adversely affects young people's mental health. However, no studies have investigated whether discontinuity of care in the transition period affects mental health. We aimed to discern the type of care young people receive after reaching the upper age limit of their CAMHS and examine differences in outcomes at 24-month follow-up between young people receiving different types of care.

Methods: To assess mental health in young people from 39 CAMHS in eight European countries (Belgium, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, and the UK), we did a longitudinal cohort study. Eligible young people were CAMHS users up to 1 year younger than the upper age limit of their CAMHS or up to 3 months older, if they were still in CAMHS. Information on mental health service use, mental health problems (ie, using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents, Youth Self-Report and Adult Self-Report, DSM-5, and ICD-10), and sociodemographic characteristics were collected using self-reported, parent-reported, and clinician-reported interviews and questionnaires. Mixed models were applied to assess relationships between baseline characteristics, mental health service use, and outcomes.

Findings: The MILESTONE cohort included 763 young people. The participants were 60·0% female (n=458) and 40·0% male (n=305), 90·3% White (n=578), and had a mean age of 17·5 years (range 15·2-19·6 years). Over the 24-month follow-up period, 48 young people (6·3%) actively withdrew from the study. For young people, the higher their scores on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (p=0·0009) and Youth Self-Report and Adult Self-Report (p=0·046), and who had a clinical classification of severe mental illness (p=0·0033), had suicidal thoughts or behaviours or self-harm (p=0·034), used psychotropic medication (p=0·0014), and had a self-reported or parent-reported need for continued treatment (p<0·0001) at baseline, were more likely to transition to AMHS or stay in CAMHS than to have care end. Overall, over the 24-month follow-up period, the mental health of young people improved, but 24·4% of young people reported an increase in problems calculated using the reliable change index, of whom 5·3% had a clinically relevant increase in problems. At 24-month follow-up, no differences in change in mental health problems since baseline were found between young people who used different types of care (CAMHS, AMHS, or no care).

Interpretation: Although approximately half of young people reaching the upper age limit of their CAMHS stop using mental health services, this was not associated with a deterioration in their mental health. Young people with the most severe mental health problems are more likely to receive continued care. If replicated, our findings suggest investments in improving transitional care for all CAMHS users might not be cost-effective in times of rising health-care costs, but might be better targeted at a subgroup of young people with increasing mental health problems who do not receive continued treatment.

Funding: European Commission's 7th Framework Programme.

在MILESTONE队列中留下儿童和青少年心理健康服务:一项关于欧洲年轻人心理健康指标、护理途径和结果的纵向队列研究。
背景:按年龄划分的心理健康服务,即儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)和成人心理健康服务(AMHS)的配置可能是连续性护理的障碍,对年轻人的心理健康产生不利影响。然而,没有研究调查过渡时期的护理中断是否会影响心理健康。我们的目的是辨别年轻人在达到CAMHS的年龄上限后接受的护理类型,并检查接受不同类型护理的年轻人在24个月随访时的结果差异。方法:为了评估来自8个欧洲国家(比利时、克罗地亚、法国、德国、意大利、爱尔兰、荷兰和英国)39个CAMHS的年轻人的心理健康状况,我们进行了一项纵向队列研究。符合条件的年轻人是CAMHS用户,比CAMHS的年龄上限小1岁,或者如果他们仍在CAMHS中,则比CAMHS的年龄上限大3个月。使用自我报告、父母报告和临床医生报告的访谈和问卷收集了有关心理健康服务使用、心理健康问题(即使用儿童和青少年国家健康结果量表、青少年自我报告和成人自我报告、DSM-5和ICD-10)和社会人口统计学特征的信息。混合模型用于评估基线特征、心理健康服务使用和结果之间的关系。研究结果:MILESTONE队列包括763名年轻人。参与者中女性占60% (n=458),男性占40% (n=305),白人占93% (n=578),平均年龄17.5岁(15.2 ~ 19.6岁)。在24个月的随访期间,48名年轻人(6.3%)主动退出研究。对于年轻人来说,他们在儿童和青少年国家健康结果量表(p= 0.0009)和青少年自我报告和成人自我报告(p= 0.046)中得分越高,并且有严重精神疾病的临床分类(p= 0.0033),有自杀念头或行为或自残(p= 0.034),使用精神药物(p= 0.0014),并且在基线时自我报告或父母报告需要继续治疗(p< 0.0001),更有可能过渡到AMHS或留在CAMHS,而不是结束护理。总体而言,在24个月的随访期间,年轻人的心理健康有所改善,但24.4%的年轻人报告使用可靠变化指数计算的问题增加,其中5.3%的人有临床相关的问题增加。在24个月的随访中,在使用不同类型护理(CAMHS、AMHS或无护理)的年轻人之间,自基线以来心理健康问题的变化没有差异。解释:虽然达到CAMHS上限的年轻人中约有一半停止使用心理健康服务,但这与他们的心理健康状况恶化无关。有最严重精神健康问题的年轻人更有可能接受持续护理。如果重复,我们的研究结果表明,在医疗保健成本上升的时代,投资于改善所有CAMHS用户的过渡护理可能不具有成本效益,但可能更好地针对那些心理健康问题日益严重、不接受持续治疗的年轻人亚群。资助:欧盟委员会第七框架计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信