Correlation between imaging features on computed tomography and combined positive score of PD-L1 expression in patients with gastric cancer.

Zhilong Wang, Yinkui Wang, Xiaoting Li, Yanling Li, Zhaode Bu, Zhongwu Li, Yingshi Sun, Jiafu Ji
{"title":"Correlation between imaging features on computed tomography and combined positive score of PD-L1 expression in patients with gastric cancer.","authors":"Zhilong Wang,&nbsp;Yinkui Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoting Li,&nbsp;Yanling Li,&nbsp;Zhaode Bu,&nbsp;Zhongwu Li,&nbsp;Yingshi Sun,&nbsp;Jiafu Ji","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.05.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the correlation between computed tomography (CT) features and combined positive score (CPS) of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with gastric cancer (GC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed an institutional database of patients who underwent GC operation without neoadjuvant chemotherapy between December 2019 and September 2020. The CPS results of PD-L1 expression of postoperative histological examination were recorded by pathology. Baseline CT features were measured, and their correlation with CPS 5 or 10 score groups of PD-L1 expression was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for 153 patients with GC were collected. Among them, 124 were advanced GC patients, and 29 were early GC patients. None of the CT features significantly differed between CPS groups with a cutoff score of 5 and a score of 10 in patients with early GC. In advanced GC, the presence of lymph nodes with short diameters >10 mm was significantly different (P=0.024) between the CPS<5 and CPS≥5 groups. CT features such as tumor attenuation in the arterial phase, long and short diameter of the largest lymph node, the sum of long diameter of the two largest lymph nodes, the sum of short diameter of the two largest lymph nodes, and the presence of lymph nodes with short diameters >10 mm significantly differed between the CPS<10 and CPS≥10 groups in advanced GC. The sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of logistic regression model for predicting CPS≥10 was 71.7%, 50.0% and 0.671, respectively. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status was significantly different in CPS groups with cutoff score of 5 and 10 in advanced GC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT findings of advanced GC patients with CPS≥10 showed greater arterial phase enhancement and larger lymph nodes. CT has the potential to help screen patients suitable for immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9830,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","volume":" ","pages":"510-518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646453/pdf/cjcr-34-5-510.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.05.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To explore the correlation between computed tomography (CT) features and combined positive score (CPS) of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

Methods: This study reviewed an institutional database of patients who underwent GC operation without neoadjuvant chemotherapy between December 2019 and September 2020. The CPS results of PD-L1 expression of postoperative histological examination were recorded by pathology. Baseline CT features were measured, and their correlation with CPS 5 or 10 score groups of PD-L1 expression was analyzed.

Results: Data for 153 patients with GC were collected. Among them, 124 were advanced GC patients, and 29 were early GC patients. None of the CT features significantly differed between CPS groups with a cutoff score of 5 and a score of 10 in patients with early GC. In advanced GC, the presence of lymph nodes with short diameters >10 mm was significantly different (P=0.024) between the CPS<5 and CPS≥5 groups. CT features such as tumor attenuation in the arterial phase, long and short diameter of the largest lymph node, the sum of long diameter of the two largest lymph nodes, the sum of short diameter of the two largest lymph nodes, and the presence of lymph nodes with short diameters >10 mm significantly differed between the CPS<10 and CPS≥10 groups in advanced GC. The sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of logistic regression model for predicting CPS≥10 was 71.7%, 50.0% and 0.671, respectively. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status was significantly different in CPS groups with cutoff score of 5 and 10 in advanced GC patients.

Conclusions: CT findings of advanced GC patients with CPS≥10 showed greater arterial phase enhancement and larger lymph nodes. CT has the potential to help screen patients suitable for immunotherapy.

胃癌患者计算机断层成像特征与PD-L1表达联合阳性评分的相关性
目的:探讨胃癌(GC)患者计算机断层扫描(CT)特征与程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)表达联合阳性评分(CPS)的相关性。方法:本研究回顾了2019年12月至2020年9月期间接受GC手术且未进行新辅助化疗的患者的机构数据库。病理记录术后组织检查PD-L1表达的CPS结果。测量基线CT特征,并分析其与CPS 5或10评分组PD-L1表达的相关性。结果:收集了153例胃癌患者的资料。其中晚期胃癌124例,早期胃癌29例。早期GC患者的截止评分为5分和10分,CPS组之间的CT特征均无显著差异。在晚期胃癌患者中,短径>10 mm的淋巴结在两组之间存在显著差异(P=0.024),两组之间存在显著差异(P=0.024)。结论:CPS≥10的晚期胃癌患者的CT表现为动脉期强化明显,淋巴结较大。CT有可能帮助筛选适合免疫治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信