The association between living arrangements and subjective health and well-being among older adults in Thailand: a special focus on skip-generation households.

Journal of rural medicine : JRM Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-22 DOI:10.2185/jrm.2022-023
Romnalin Thonglor, Keiko Nakamura, Kaoruko Seino
{"title":"The association between living arrangements and subjective health and well-being among older adults in Thailand: a special focus on skip-generation households.","authors":"Romnalin Thonglor, Keiko Nakamura, Kaoruko Seino","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2022-023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Older adults in skip-generation households (SGHs) play a valuable role in maintaining the cohesion of extended families in the absence of the middle generation. Little is known about the health and well-being of older adults in SGHs or how it varies depending on their age. This study aimed to examine 1) the association between living in SGHs and subjective health and well-being and 2) the association between subjective health and well-being of older adults in SGHs across age groups. <b>Methods:</b> Drawing data from the 2017 national survey of older people, older adults aged ≥60 years without disability in activities of daily living (n=38,088) were included for multiple regression analyses. Living arrangements were classified into SGHs and non-SGHs. Subjective health was evaluated based on self-rated health, whereas subjective well-being was evaluated using a happiness score. Ordinal logistic regression and linear regression models, stratified by age groups (young-old, 60-69; middle-old, 70-79; and old-old, ≥80), compared subjective health and well-being of older adults in SGHs and non-SHGs, while controlling for potential covariates. <b>Results:</b> Among older Thai adults, 10.1% lived in SGHs, and 11.1%, 9.5%, and 6.3% were among the young-old, middle-old, and old-old, respectively. Across age groups, older adults living in SGHs reported better health status but worse well-being than those living in non-SGHs. Older adults from the old-old group living in SGHs seemed to report the best health status, whereas those in the young-old and old-old groups tended to report the worst well-being. The direction of the association between living arrangements and subjective health and well-being did not differ by age group. <b>Conclusion:</b> Better health status but worse well-being were observed in SGHs. Social sectors should pay attention to the well-being of these older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/23/jrm-17-205.PMC9613374.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2022-023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Older adults in skip-generation households (SGHs) play a valuable role in maintaining the cohesion of extended families in the absence of the middle generation. Little is known about the health and well-being of older adults in SGHs or how it varies depending on their age. This study aimed to examine 1) the association between living in SGHs and subjective health and well-being and 2) the association between subjective health and well-being of older adults in SGHs across age groups. Methods: Drawing data from the 2017 national survey of older people, older adults aged ≥60 years without disability in activities of daily living (n=38,088) were included for multiple regression analyses. Living arrangements were classified into SGHs and non-SGHs. Subjective health was evaluated based on self-rated health, whereas subjective well-being was evaluated using a happiness score. Ordinal logistic regression and linear regression models, stratified by age groups (young-old, 60-69; middle-old, 70-79; and old-old, ≥80), compared subjective health and well-being of older adults in SGHs and non-SHGs, while controlling for potential covariates. Results: Among older Thai adults, 10.1% lived in SGHs, and 11.1%, 9.5%, and 6.3% were among the young-old, middle-old, and old-old, respectively. Across age groups, older adults living in SGHs reported better health status but worse well-being than those living in non-SGHs. Older adults from the old-old group living in SGHs seemed to report the best health status, whereas those in the young-old and old-old groups tended to report the worst well-being. The direction of the association between living arrangements and subjective health and well-being did not differ by age group. Conclusion: Better health status but worse well-being were observed in SGHs. Social sectors should pay attention to the well-being of these older adults.

泰国老年人的生活安排与主观健康和幸福之间的关系:特别关注跳代家庭。
目的:跳代家庭(SGH)中的老年人在中代缺失的情况下,在维持大家庭的凝聚力方面发挥着重要作用。但人们对跳代家庭中老年人的健康和福祉以及他们的健康和福祉因年龄而异的情况知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨:1)居住在SGHs与主观健康和幸福感之间的关系;2)不同年龄组SGHs中老年人的主观健康和幸福感之间的关系。研究方法利用2017年全国老年人调查数据,纳入年龄≥60岁、无日常生活活动障碍的老年人(n=38,088)进行多元回归分析。生活安排分为SGH和非SGH。主观健康状况根据自我健康评分进行评估,而主观幸福感则使用幸福感评分进行评估。按年龄组(年轻,60-69 岁;中年,70-79 岁;老年,≥80 岁)分层的顺序逻辑回归和线性回归模型比较了在SGH 和非 SGH 居住的老年人的主观健康和幸福感,同时控制了潜在的协变量。结果显示在泰国老年人中,10.1% 的人居住在 SGHs,年轻、中年和老年分别占 11.1%、9.5% 和 6.3%。在各个年龄组中,与居住在非 SGHs 的老年人相比,居住在 SGHs 的老年人的健康状况更好,但幸福感更差。居住在SGHs的老年组的老年人似乎报告了最好的健康状况,而居住在SGHs的青年组和老年组的老年人往往报告了最差的幸福感。居住安排与主观健康和幸福感之间的关联方向并不因年龄组而异。结论在新加坡人居住区,健康状况较好,但幸福感较差。社会各界应关注这些老年人的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信