Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.3
Jiaping Feng, Jianghao Lu, Chunchun Jin, Yihao Chen, Sihan Chen, Guoqiang Guo, Xuehao Gong
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jiaping Feng,&nbsp;Jianghao Lu,&nbsp;Chunchun Jin,&nbsp;Yihao Chen,&nbsp;Sihan Chen,&nbsp;Guoqiang Guo,&nbsp;Xuehao Gong","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics12112648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that investigated the diagnostic performance of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in differentiating between benign and malignant breast tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies published between January 2010 and March 2022 were retrieved by online literature search conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine Disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Vip databases. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odd ratios were calculated using Stata software 15.0. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> statistic and Q test. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. Influence analysis was conducted to determine the robustness of the pooled conclusions. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test was performed to assess publication bias. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was constructed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies involving 2749 breast lesions were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.84, inconsistency index [<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>] = 28.32%) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 89.36%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 19.95 (95% CI, 14.84-26.82). The area under the SROC (AUC) was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMI has a relatively high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. It represents a promising supplementary technique for the diagnosis of breast neoplasms.</p>","PeriodicalId":520604,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689350/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that investigated the diagnostic performance of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in differentiating between benign and malignant breast tumors.

Methods: Studies published between January 2010 and March 2022 were retrieved by online literature search conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine Disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Vip databases. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odd ratios were calculated using Stata software 15.0. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using I2 statistic and Q test. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. Influence analysis was conducted to determine the robustness of the pooled conclusions. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test was performed to assess publication bias. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was constructed.

Results: Twenty-three studies involving 2749 breast lesions were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.84, inconsistency index [I2] = 28.32%) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88, I2 = 89.36%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 19.95 (95% CI, 14.84-26.82). The area under the SROC (AUC) was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87).

Conclusion: SMI has a relatively high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. It represents a promising supplementary technique for the diagnosis of breast neoplasms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高超微血管成像在鉴别乳腺良恶性肿瘤中的诊断价值:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:我们对研究高超微血管成像(SMI)在鉴别乳腺良恶性肿瘤诊断性能的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:通过PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国生物医学光盘、中国国家知识基础设施、万方、维普等数据库的在线文献检索检索2010年1月至2022年3月发表的研究。使用Stata软件15.0计算合并敏感性、特异性和诊断奇比。采用I2统计量和Q检验评估纳入研究间的异质性。采用meta回归和亚组分析来调查异质性的潜在来源。进行影响分析以确定合并结论的稳健性。采用Deeks漏斗图不对称检验评估发表偏倚。建立了接收者工作特征曲线(SROC)。结果:23项涉及2749例乳腺病变的研究被纳入我们的荟萃分析。合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.80(95%可信区间[CI], 0.77 ~ 0.84,不一致指数[I2] = 28.32%)和0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 ~ 0.88, I2 = 89.36%)。合并诊断优势比为19.95 (95% CI, 14.84-26.82)。SROC下面积(AUC)为0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87)。结论:SMI对乳腺良恶性病变鉴别具有较高的敏感性、特异性和准确性。它代表了一种很有前途的乳腺肿瘤诊断辅助技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书