Interest and Utility of MC1R Testing for Melanoma Risk in Dermatology Patients with a History of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer.

IF 1.2 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Skin Cancer Pub Date : 2022-07-31 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/4046554
Jennifer L Hay, Erica H Lee, Stephanie N Christian, Elizabeth Schofield, Jada G Hamilton, Ciyu Yang, Bobak Hedayati, Keimya Sadeghi, Mark E Robson, Allan Halpern, Liying Zhang, Irene Orlow
{"title":"Interest and Utility of <i>MC1R</i> Testing for Melanoma Risk in Dermatology Patients with a History of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer.","authors":"Jennifer L Hay,&nbsp;Erica H Lee,&nbsp;Stephanie N Christian,&nbsp;Elizabeth Schofield,&nbsp;Jada G Hamilton,&nbsp;Ciyu Yang,&nbsp;Bobak Hedayati,&nbsp;Keimya Sadeghi,&nbsp;Mark E Robson,&nbsp;Allan Halpern,&nbsp;Liying Zhang,&nbsp;Irene Orlow","doi":"10.1155/2022/4046554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public access to genetic information is increasing, and community dermatologists may progressively encounter patients interested in genetic testing for melanoma risk. Clarifying potential utility will help plan for this inevitability. We determined interest and uptake of genetic risk feedback based on melanocortin receptor gene (<i>MC1R</i>) variants, immediate (two weeks) responses to risk feedback, and test utility at three months in patients (age ≥ 18, with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer). Participants (<i>N</i> = 50) completed a baseline survey and were invited to consider <i>MC1R</i> testing via the study website. Testing interest and uptake were assessed through registration of test decision, request of a saliva test kit, and kit return (all yes/no). Immediate responses to risk feedback included feedback-relevant thoughts, emotions, communication, and information seeking after result receipt; test utility outcomes included family and physician communication and information seeking. Results indicated good retention at both time points (76%; 74%). Half (48%) logged onto the study website, and of these, most (92%) chose testing and (95%) returned a saliva sample. After two weeks, most (94%) had read all the risk feedback information and distress was low (<i>M</i> = 8.81, 7-28, SD = 2.23). Many (69%) had talked with their family about the results. By three months, most had spoken with family (92%) and physicians (80%) about skin cancer risk. Physician communication was higher (70%) in those tested versus those not tested (40%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). The substantial interest and promising outcomes associated with <i>MC1R</i> genetic testing in dermatology patients inform intervention strategies to enhance benefits and minimize risks of skin cancer genetic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":17172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Skin Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"4046554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357806/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Skin Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4046554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Public access to genetic information is increasing, and community dermatologists may progressively encounter patients interested in genetic testing for melanoma risk. Clarifying potential utility will help plan for this inevitability. We determined interest and uptake of genetic risk feedback based on melanocortin receptor gene (MC1R) variants, immediate (two weeks) responses to risk feedback, and test utility at three months in patients (age ≥ 18, with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer). Participants (N = 50) completed a baseline survey and were invited to consider MC1R testing via the study website. Testing interest and uptake were assessed through registration of test decision, request of a saliva test kit, and kit return (all yes/no). Immediate responses to risk feedback included feedback-relevant thoughts, emotions, communication, and information seeking after result receipt; test utility outcomes included family and physician communication and information seeking. Results indicated good retention at both time points (76%; 74%). Half (48%) logged onto the study website, and of these, most (92%) chose testing and (95%) returned a saliva sample. After two weeks, most (94%) had read all the risk feedback information and distress was low (M = 8.81, 7-28, SD = 2.23). Many (69%) had talked with their family about the results. By three months, most had spoken with family (92%) and physicians (80%) about skin cancer risk. Physician communication was higher (70%) in those tested versus those not tested (40%, p = 0.02). The substantial interest and promising outcomes associated with MC1R genetic testing in dermatology patients inform intervention strategies to enhance benefits and minimize risks of skin cancer genetic testing.

MC1R检测在有非黑色素瘤皮肤癌病史的皮肤病患者中检测黑色素瘤风险的兴趣和效用
公众获取遗传信息的途径越来越多,社区皮肤科医生可能会逐渐遇到对黑色素瘤风险基因检测感兴趣的患者。明确潜在的效用将有助于为这种必然性做准备。我们确定了基于黑素皮质素受体基因(MC1R)变异的遗传风险反馈的兴趣和摄取,对风险反馈的即时(两周)反应,并在患者(年龄≥18岁,有非黑色素瘤皮肤癌病史)三个月时测试效用。参与者(N = 50)完成了基线调查,并被邀请通过研究网站考虑MC1R测试。通过注册检测决定、要求唾液检测试剂盒和试剂盒返回(均为是/否)来评估检测兴趣和接受情况。对风险反馈的即时反应包括收到结果后与反馈相关的想法、情绪、沟通和信息寻求;测试效用结果包括家庭和医生沟通和信息寻求。结果表明,在两个时间点保持良好(76%;74%)。一半(48%)的人登录了研究网站,其中大多数(92%)选择了测试,(95%)返回了唾液样本。2周后,大部分(94%)患者阅读了所有风险反馈信息,且焦虑程度较低(M = 8.81, 7-28, SD = 2.23)。许多人(69%)曾与家人谈论过结果。到三个月时,大多数人都与家人(92%)和医生(80%)谈论过皮肤癌的风险。与未接受检测的患者(40%,p = 0.02)相比,接受检测的患者与医生的沟通(70%)更高。皮肤科患者对MC1R基因检测的大量兴趣和有希望的结果为干预策略提供了信息,以提高益处并将皮肤癌基因检测的风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Skin Cancer
Journal of Skin Cancer DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Skin Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes clinical and translational research on the detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of skin malignancies. The journal encourages the submission of original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to pathology, prognostic indicators and biomarkers, novel therapies, as well as drug sensitivity and resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信