Intrahepatic flow diversion prior to segmental Yttrium-90 radioembolization for challenging tumor vasculature

Q3 Medicine
Lindsay B. Young , Marcin Kolber , Michael J. King , Mona Ranade , Vivian L. Bishay , Rahul S. Patel , Francis S. Nowakowski , Aaron M. Fischman , Robert A. Lookstein , Edward Kim
{"title":"Intrahepatic flow diversion prior to segmental Yttrium-90 radioembolization for challenging tumor vasculature","authors":"Lindsay B. Young ,&nbsp;Marcin Kolber ,&nbsp;Michael J. King ,&nbsp;Mona Ranade ,&nbsp;Vivian L. Bishay ,&nbsp;Rahul S. Patel ,&nbsp;Francis S. Nowakowski ,&nbsp;Aaron M. Fischman ,&nbsp;Robert A. Lookstein ,&nbsp;Edward Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jimed.2022.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hepatic tumors with complex vascular supply or poor relative perfusion are prone to decreased rates of objective response. This is compounded in the setting of Yttrium-90 (Y90) transarterial radioembolization (TARE), which is minimally embolic and flow-dependent, relying on high threshold dose for complete response.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We describe our experience with intrahepatic flow diversion (FD) prior to TARE of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with challenging vascular supply.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Between April 2014 and January 2020, 886 cases of coinciding MAA or TARE and bland embolization or temporary occlusion were identified. Intraprocedural embolizations performed for more routine purposes were excluded. FD was performed by bland embolization or temporary occlusion of vessels supplying non-malignant parenchyma in cases where flow was not preferential to target tumor. Lesion characteristics, vascular supply, treatment approach, angiography, and adverse events (AEs) were reviewed. Radiographic response was assessed using mRECIST criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>22 cases of FD of focal HCC were identified. Embolics included calibrated microspheres (n ​= ​11), microcoils (n ​= ​4), gelfoam (n ​= ​3), temporary balloon occlusion (n ​= ​2) and temporary deployment of a microvascular plug (n ​= ​1). Post-treatment SPECT-CT dosimetry coverage was concordant with target lesions in all cases. Mean follow-up was 16.7 months (1.4–45 ​mos). Tumor-specific response per mRECIST was 41% complete response, 50% objective response, and 59% disease control rate. No major adverse events or grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that FD prior to TARE is safe and potentially effective in treating HCC with complex vascular supply or poor tumor perfusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 79-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349007/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360222000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Hepatic tumors with complex vascular supply or poor relative perfusion are prone to decreased rates of objective response. This is compounded in the setting of Yttrium-90 (Y90) transarterial radioembolization (TARE), which is minimally embolic and flow-dependent, relying on high threshold dose for complete response.

Objective

We describe our experience with intrahepatic flow diversion (FD) prior to TARE of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with challenging vascular supply.

Materials and methods

Between April 2014 and January 2020, 886 cases of coinciding MAA or TARE and bland embolization or temporary occlusion were identified. Intraprocedural embolizations performed for more routine purposes were excluded. FD was performed by bland embolization or temporary occlusion of vessels supplying non-malignant parenchyma in cases where flow was not preferential to target tumor. Lesion characteristics, vascular supply, treatment approach, angiography, and adverse events (AEs) were reviewed. Radiographic response was assessed using mRECIST criteria.

Results

22 cases of FD of focal HCC were identified. Embolics included calibrated microspheres (n ​= ​11), microcoils (n ​= ​4), gelfoam (n ​= ​3), temporary balloon occlusion (n ​= ​2) and temporary deployment of a microvascular plug (n ​= ​1). Post-treatment SPECT-CT dosimetry coverage was concordant with target lesions in all cases. Mean follow-up was 16.7 months (1.4–45 ​mos). Tumor-specific response per mRECIST was 41% complete response, 50% objective response, and 59% disease control rate. No major adverse events or grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity were reported.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that FD prior to TARE is safe and potentially effective in treating HCC with complex vascular supply or poor tumor perfusion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

节段性钇-90放射栓塞治疗肿瘤血管系统前肝内血流改道。
背景:血管供应复杂或相对灌注不良的肝肿瘤容易降低客观反应率。在钇-90(Y90)经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)的情况下,这一点更加复杂,该栓塞具有最小的栓塞性和流量依赖性,依赖于高阈值剂量来实现完全反应。目的:我们描述了我们在肝细胞癌(HCC)TARE前进行肝内分流(FD)的经验,该肝癌具有挑战性的血管供应。材料和方法:2014年4月至2020年1月,共发现886例MAA或TARE与轻度栓塞或临时闭塞同时发生的病例。排除了为更常规目的进行的术中栓塞。在血流不优先于靶肿瘤的情况下,FD通过轻度栓塞或暂时闭塞供应非恶性实质的血管来进行。综述了病变特点、血管供应、治疗方法、血管造影术和不良事件。射线照相反应采用mRECIST标准进行评估。结果:发现22例局灶性肝癌FD。栓塞包括校准的微球(n​=​11) ,微卷(n​=​4) ,凝胶泡沫(n​=​3) ,暂时性球囊闭塞(n​=​2) 和微血管栓塞的临时部署(n​=​1) 。在所有病例中,治疗后SPECT-CT剂量测定覆盖率与靶病变一致。平均随访16.7个月(1.4-45​mos)。每mRECIST的肿瘤特异性应答为41%的完全应答、50%的客观应答和59%的疾病控制率。未报告重大不良事件或3/4级肝毒性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在TARE之前的FD治疗血管供应复杂或肿瘤灌注不良的HCC是安全且潜在有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interventional Medicine
Journal of Interventional Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信