The Human Filaria Loa loa: Update on Diagnostics and Immune Response.

IF 3.1 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRTM.S355104
Roland Dieki, Edouard Nsi-Emvo, Jean Paul Akue
{"title":"The Human Filaria <i>Loa loa</i>: Update on Diagnostics and Immune Response.","authors":"Roland Dieki,&nbsp;Edouard Nsi-Emvo,&nbsp;Jean Paul Akue","doi":"10.2147/RRTM.S355104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Loa loa</i> loiasis was considered an anecdotal disease 30 years ago. Its spread in Equatorial Africa and the side effects associated with mass drug administration programs against filariasis in co-endemic areas have drawn the attention of the international research community. Progress in research conducted to date has provided insight into the immunobiology of this parasite. An interesting finding reported in several studies is that 70% of individuals with loiasis do not carry microfilariae in their blood, and 30% are microfilaremic, suggesting the involvement of several immunological mechanisms, as shown by elevated specific IgG4 and IgE levels signifying a potential cross-linking mechanism between the two isotypes via <i>L. loa</i> antigen to prevent allergy. A mechanism of anergy in the appearance of microfilariae in the peripheral blood results in immunological unresponsiveness in individuals with microfilariae. There is an interaction between other pathogens (parasites, bacteria, viruses) in individuals co-infected with <i>L. loa</i>. The strong antigen cross-reactivity between <i>L. loa</i> and lymphatic filarial worms warrants a re-evaluation of the distribution of the latter in co-endemic regions. The mechanism of concomitant immunity observed in the elimination of microfilariae or infective larvae (third-stage larvae, L3) may be used for the conception of an immunoprophylactic strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21138,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/60/rrtm-13-41.PMC9355020.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRTM.S355104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Loa loa loiasis was considered an anecdotal disease 30 years ago. Its spread in Equatorial Africa and the side effects associated with mass drug administration programs against filariasis in co-endemic areas have drawn the attention of the international research community. Progress in research conducted to date has provided insight into the immunobiology of this parasite. An interesting finding reported in several studies is that 70% of individuals with loiasis do not carry microfilariae in their blood, and 30% are microfilaremic, suggesting the involvement of several immunological mechanisms, as shown by elevated specific IgG4 and IgE levels signifying a potential cross-linking mechanism between the two isotypes via L. loa antigen to prevent allergy. A mechanism of anergy in the appearance of microfilariae in the peripheral blood results in immunological unresponsiveness in individuals with microfilariae. There is an interaction between other pathogens (parasites, bacteria, viruses) in individuals co-infected with L. loa. The strong antigen cross-reactivity between L. loa and lymphatic filarial worms warrants a re-evaluation of the distribution of the latter in co-endemic regions. The mechanism of concomitant immunity observed in the elimination of microfilariae or infective larvae (third-stage larvae, L3) may be used for the conception of an immunoprophylactic strategy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人类丝虫病:诊断和免疫反应的最新进展。
30年前,人们认为Loa loasis是一种道听途说的疾病。丝虫病在赤道非洲的传播以及在共同流行地区针对丝虫病的大规模药物管理计划的副作用引起了国际研究界的注意。迄今为止所进行的研究进展为这种寄生虫的免疫生物学提供了深入了解。一些研究报告了一个有趣的发现,70%的路易丝病患者血液中不携带微丝虫病,30%的人有微丝虫病,这表明涉及多种免疫机制,如特异性IgG4和IgE水平升高,表明两种同型之间可能通过L. loa抗原交联机制来预防过敏。微丝蚴在外周血中出现的能量机制导致微丝蚴个体的免疫无反应性。在同时感染L. loa的个体中,其他病原体(寄生虫、细菌、病毒)之间存在相互作用。L. loa和淋巴丝虫虫之间强烈的抗原交叉反应性值得重新评估后者在共流行地区的分布。在消灭微丝虫或感染性幼虫(第三期幼虫,L3)中观察到的伴随免疫机制可用于免疫预防策略的构想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine
Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信