Prognostic value of Ocular Trauma Score and pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score in predicting the visual prognosis following ocular injury.

Aparajita Chaudhary, Rupanshi Singh, Satya Prakash Singh
{"title":"Prognostic value of Ocular Trauma Score and pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score in predicting the visual prognosis following ocular injury.","authors":"Aparajita Chaudhary,&nbsp;Rupanshi Singh,&nbsp;Satya Prakash Singh","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2022.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To assess the role of Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) and Pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score (POTS) in predicting visual prognosis following ocular injury. <b>Methods:</b> 120 patients, aged 3 to 70 years, with ocular injury, presenting between August 2020 and 2021, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were classified using the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System (BETTS). Data regarding age, sex, injury type, location, initial visual acuity, and treatment were recorded. Patients were evaluated using OTS and POTS, wherever applicable, to predict visual prognosis. Follow-up was done for 6 months post-treatment to compare the predicted and actual visual outcome. <b>Results:</b> 120 patients (96 males and 24 females) were included in the study. The mean age was 17.2 ± 14.7 years (range 3 to 70 years). 91.6% patients included were under the age of 40 years. Blunt trauma (n=62) was slightly more common. 80 patients (66.67%) reported to the hospital after 48 hours of injury. 34 patients (28.33%) had traumatic cataract alone and IOL implantation was done as a primary procedure. In 20 patients (16.67%), lens aspiration was done primarily, with secondary IOL implantation. Six months after the treatment, the BCVA in the open globe injury patients was 20/ 200 or better in 36 patients (75%) and 20/ 40 or better in 18 patients (37.5%). Amongst the closed globe injuries, 48 patients (66.67%), had a BCVA 20/ 200 or better, while 32 (44.44%) had a BCVA of 20/ 40 or better. <b>Conclusion:</b> OTS is a reliable predictor of final visual outcome, both in blunt and penetrating injuries. The POTS shows gross underestimation of final visual outcome. <b>Abbreviations:</b> BETTS = Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System, POTS = Pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score, OTS = Ocular Trauma Score, OGI = Open Globe Injury, HM = Hand Movement, NLP = No Light Perception, LP = Light Perception, CGI = Closed Globe Injury, VA = Visual Acuity, BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity, IAP = Indian Academy of Pediatrics, IOL = Intraocular Lens, IGATES = International Globe and Adnexal Trauma Epidemiology Study, IOP = Intraocular Pressure, CART = Classification and Regression Tree, USA = United States of America.</p>","PeriodicalId":21385,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"66 2","pages":"146-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289765/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2022.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: To assess the role of Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) and Pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score (POTS) in predicting visual prognosis following ocular injury. Methods: 120 patients, aged 3 to 70 years, with ocular injury, presenting between August 2020 and 2021, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were classified using the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System (BETTS). Data regarding age, sex, injury type, location, initial visual acuity, and treatment were recorded. Patients were evaluated using OTS and POTS, wherever applicable, to predict visual prognosis. Follow-up was done for 6 months post-treatment to compare the predicted and actual visual outcome. Results: 120 patients (96 males and 24 females) were included in the study. The mean age was 17.2 ± 14.7 years (range 3 to 70 years). 91.6% patients included were under the age of 40 years. Blunt trauma (n=62) was slightly more common. 80 patients (66.67%) reported to the hospital after 48 hours of injury. 34 patients (28.33%) had traumatic cataract alone and IOL implantation was done as a primary procedure. In 20 patients (16.67%), lens aspiration was done primarily, with secondary IOL implantation. Six months after the treatment, the BCVA in the open globe injury patients was 20/ 200 or better in 36 patients (75%) and 20/ 40 or better in 18 patients (37.5%). Amongst the closed globe injuries, 48 patients (66.67%), had a BCVA 20/ 200 or better, while 32 (44.44%) had a BCVA of 20/ 40 or better. Conclusion: OTS is a reliable predictor of final visual outcome, both in blunt and penetrating injuries. The POTS shows gross underestimation of final visual outcome. Abbreviations: BETTS = Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System, POTS = Pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score, OTS = Ocular Trauma Score, OGI = Open Globe Injury, HM = Hand Movement, NLP = No Light Perception, LP = Light Perception, CGI = Closed Globe Injury, VA = Visual Acuity, BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity, IAP = Indian Academy of Pediatrics, IOL = Intraocular Lens, IGATES = International Globe and Adnexal Trauma Epidemiology Study, IOP = Intraocular Pressure, CART = Classification and Regression Tree, USA = United States of America.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

眼外伤评分和儿童穿透性眼外伤评分对眼外伤后视力预后的预测价值。
目的:评价眼外伤评分(OTS)和儿童穿透性眼外伤评分(POTS)在预测眼外伤后视力预后中的作用。方法:采用伯明翰眼外伤术语系统(BETTS)对120例符合纳入标准的2020年8月至2021年8月就诊的3 ~ 70岁眼部损伤患者进行分类。记录年龄、性别、损伤类型、部位、初始视力和治疗情况。在适用的情况下,使用OTS和POTS对患者进行评估,以预测视力预后。治疗后随访6个月,比较预测和实际视力结果。结果:120例患者纳入研究,其中男性96例,女性24例。平均年龄17.2±14.7岁(3 ~ 70岁)。91.6%的患者年龄在40岁以下。钝性创伤(n=62)稍多见。80例(66.67%)伤后48小时入院。单纯外伤性白内障34例(28.33%)以人工晶状体植入术为主。20例(16.67%)患者以晶状体吸出为主,二期人工晶状体植入术。治疗6个月后,36例(75%)开放球损伤患者的BCVA为20/ 200或更好,18例(37.5%)患者的BCVA为20/ 40或更好。闭合性球损伤患者中,48例(66.67%)BCVA为20/ 200及以上,32例(44.44%)BCVA为20/ 40及以上。结论:在钝性和穿透性损伤中,OTS是最终视力结果的可靠预测指标。POTS显示对最终视觉结果的严重低估。缩写:BETTS =伯明翰眼外伤术语系统,POTS =儿童穿透性眼外伤评分,OTS =眼外伤评分,OGI =开放性眼球损伤,HM =手部运动,NLP =无光知觉,LP =光知觉,CGI =闭合性眼球损伤,VA =视力,BCVA =最佳矫正视力,IAP =印度儿科学会,IOL =人工晶状体,IGATES =国际眼球和附件外伤流行病学研究,IOP =眼压,CART =分类与回归树,USA =美利坚合众国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信