Comparison of nutritional risk status assessment tools in predicting 30-day survival in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Saudi Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-04 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2022.236
Umut Sabri Kasapoglu, Abdullah Gok, Leman Acun Delen, Ayse Belin Ozer
{"title":"Comparison of nutritional risk status assessment tools in predicting 30-day survival in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients.","authors":"Umut Sabri Kasapoglu,&nbsp;Abdullah Gok,&nbsp;Leman Acun Delen,&nbsp;Ayse Belin Ozer","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2022.236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few clinical studies have addressed nutritional risk assessment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the nutritional risk status of the critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients admitted to the ICU, and compare the nutritional risk screening tools.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Medical record review SETTING: Tertiary critical care unit PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included adult (age >18 years) PCR-confirmed critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia cases admitted to the ICU between August 2020 and September 2021. Scoring systems were used to assess COVID-19 severity and nutritional status (mNUTRIC: modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill, NRS2002: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002). The 30-day mortality prediction performance of nutritional scores and survival comparisons between clinical and demographic factors were assessed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Compare the nutrition risk tools SAMPLE SIZE: 281 patients with a mean (SD) age of 64.3 (13.3) years; 143 (50.8%) were 65 years and older.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean mNUTRIC score of the cases was 3.81 (1.66) and the mean NRS-2002 score was 3.21 (0.84.), and 101 (35.9%) were at high risk of malnutrition according to the mNUTRIC score and 229 (81.4%) according to the NRS 2002 score. In cases at high risk of malnutrition by the mNUTRIC score there was a greater need for invasive mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy (<i>P</i><.001 for all comparisons). The mNUTRIC score was superior to the NRS-2002 score in estimating 30-day mortality. In patients who died within 30 days, the mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score on the day of hospitalization were significantly higher (<i>P</i><.001), and the proportion of patients with NRS-2002 score ≥3 and mNUTRIC score ≥5 was significantly higher in the non-surviving group (<i>P</i><.001). In addition, patients with a high risk of malnutrition had a shorter survival time. The mNUTRIC score was an independent and important prognostic factor for 30-day mortality, and patients with an mNUTRIC score ≥5 had a 6.26-fold risk for 30-day mortality in the multivariate Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One third of critical COVID-19 pneumonia cases hospitalized in the ICU due to acute respiratory failure have a high risk of malnutrition, and a high mNUTRIC score is associated with increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single center retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":8016,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/71/0256-4947.2022.236.PMC9357296.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Few clinical studies have addressed nutritional risk assessment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Objectives: Assess the nutritional risk status of the critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients admitted to the ICU, and compare the nutritional risk screening tools.

Design: Medical record review SETTING: Tertiary critical care unit PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included adult (age >18 years) PCR-confirmed critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia cases admitted to the ICU between August 2020 and September 2021. Scoring systems were used to assess COVID-19 severity and nutritional status (mNUTRIC: modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill, NRS2002: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002). The 30-day mortality prediction performance of nutritional scores and survival comparisons between clinical and demographic factors were assessed.

Main outcome measures: Compare the nutrition risk tools SAMPLE SIZE: 281 patients with a mean (SD) age of 64.3 (13.3) years; 143 (50.8%) were 65 years and older.

Results: The mean mNUTRIC score of the cases was 3.81 (1.66) and the mean NRS-2002 score was 3.21 (0.84.), and 101 (35.9%) were at high risk of malnutrition according to the mNUTRIC score and 229 (81.4%) according to the NRS 2002 score. In cases at high risk of malnutrition by the mNUTRIC score there was a greater need for invasive mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy (P<.001 for all comparisons). The mNUTRIC score was superior to the NRS-2002 score in estimating 30-day mortality. In patients who died within 30 days, the mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score on the day of hospitalization were significantly higher (P<.001), and the proportion of patients with NRS-2002 score ≥3 and mNUTRIC score ≥5 was significantly higher in the non-surviving group (P<.001). In addition, patients with a high risk of malnutrition had a shorter survival time. The mNUTRIC score was an independent and important prognostic factor for 30-day mortality, and patients with an mNUTRIC score ≥5 had a 6.26-fold risk for 30-day mortality in the multivariate Cox regression.

Conclusion: One third of critical COVID-19 pneumonia cases hospitalized in the ICU due to acute respiratory failure have a high risk of malnutrition, and a high mNUTRIC score is associated with increased mortality.

Limitations: Single center retrospective study.

Conflict of interest: None.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

营养风险状况评估工具在预测COVID-19肺炎危重患者30天生存中的比较
背景:很少有临床研究涉及重症监护病房(ICU)收治的COVID-19肺炎患者的营养风险评估。目的:评估ICU收治的COVID-19肺炎危重患者的营养风险状况,并比较营养风险筛查工具。设计:病历回顾设置:三级重症监护病房患者和方法:我们纳入了2020年8月至2021年9月期间入住ICU的成人(年龄>18岁)pcr确诊的重症COVID-19肺炎病例。使用评分系统评估COVID-19的严重程度和营养状况(mNUTRIC:修订的危重患者营养风险,NRS2002:营养风险筛查2002)。评估营养评分的30天死亡率预测性能以及临床和人口统计学因素之间的生存比较。主要结局指标:比较营养风险工具样本大小:281例患者,平均(SD)年龄64.3(13.3)岁;65岁及以上143例(50.8%)。结果:mNUTRIC评分平均为3.81分(1.66分),NRS-2002评分平均为3.21分(0.84分),其中mNUTRIC评分为营养不良高危人群101例(35.9%),NRS-2002评分为229例(81.4%)。在mNUTRIC评分为营养不良高风险的病例中,更需要有创机械通气、血管加压药物和肾脏替代治疗(ppp)结论:因急性呼吸衰竭住院的重症COVID-19肺炎患者中,有三分之一存在营养不良高风险,且高mNUTRIC评分与死亡率增加相关。局限性:单中心回顾性研究。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Saudi Medicine
Annals of Saudi Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Saudi Medicine (ASM) is published bimonthly by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We publish scientific reports of clinical interest in English. All submissions are subject to peer review by the editorial board and by reviewers in appropriate specialties. The journal will consider for publication manuscripts from any part of the world, but particularly reports that would be of interest to readers in the Middle East or other parts of Asia and Africa. Please go to the Author Resource Center for additional information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信