Developing a code of practice for literature searching in health sciences: a project description.

Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.29173/jchla29409
Brooke Ballantyne Scott, Susan Baer, Ashley Farrell, Pat Lee, Jackie MacDonald, Danielle Rabb, Marcus Vaska
{"title":"Developing a code of practice for literature searching in health sciences: a project description.","authors":"Brooke Ballantyne Scott,&nbsp;Susan Baer,&nbsp;Ashley Farrell,&nbsp;Pat Lee,&nbsp;Jackie MacDonald,&nbsp;Danielle Rabb,&nbsp;Marcus Vaska","doi":"10.29173/jchla29409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Libraries have provided mediated search services for more than forty years without a practice standard to guide the execution of searches, training of searchers, or evaluation of search performance. A pan-Canadian group of librarians completed a study of the literature on mediated search practices from 2014-2017 as a first step in addressing this deficit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a three-phase, six-part content analysis process to examine and analyze published guidance on literature searching. Card sorting, Delphi methods, and an online questionnaire were then used to validate our findings and build a code of practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our code of practice for mediated searching lists eighty-five search tasks arranged in performance order, within five progressive levels of search complexity. A glossary of 150 search terms supports the code of practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The research literature on mediated search methods is sparse and fragmented, lacking currency and a shared vocabulary. A code of practice for mediated searching will provide clarity in terminology, approach, and methods. This code of practice will provide a unified and convenient reference for training a new hire, upholding standards of search service delivery, or educating the next wave of health library professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359689/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Libraries have provided mediated search services for more than forty years without a practice standard to guide the execution of searches, training of searchers, or evaluation of search performance. A pan-Canadian group of librarians completed a study of the literature on mediated search practices from 2014-2017 as a first step in addressing this deficit.

Methods: We used a three-phase, six-part content analysis process to examine and analyze published guidance on literature searching. Card sorting, Delphi methods, and an online questionnaire were then used to validate our findings and build a code of practice.

Results: Our code of practice for mediated searching lists eighty-five search tasks arranged in performance order, within five progressive levels of search complexity. A glossary of 150 search terms supports the code of practice.

Discussion: The research literature on mediated search methods is sparse and fragmented, lacking currency and a shared vocabulary. A code of practice for mediated searching will provide clarity in terminology, approach, and methods. This code of practice will provide a unified and convenient reference for training a new hire, upholding standards of search service delivery, or educating the next wave of health library professionals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
制定健康科学文献检索的实践规范:项目描述。
引言:图书馆提供中介搜索服务已有40多年,但没有一个实践标准来指导搜索的执行、搜索人员的培训或搜索性能的评估。一个泛加拿大图书馆员小组完成了一项关于2014-2017年中介搜索实践的文献研究,作为解决这一赤字的第一步。方法:采用三阶段、六部分的内容分析流程对已发表的文献检索指南进行检验和分析。然后使用卡片分类、德尔菲法和在线问卷来验证我们的发现并建立一个实践准则。结果:我们的中介搜索实践代码列出了按性能顺序排列的85个搜索任务,在5个渐进的搜索复杂度级别内。一个包含150个搜索词的词汇表支持实践准则。讨论:关于中介搜索方法的研究文献是稀疏和碎片化的,缺乏流通和共享词汇。中介搜索的实践准则将提供术语、方法和方法的清晰度。该行为准则将为培训新员工、维护搜索服务交付标准或教育下一波健康图书馆专业人员提供统一和方便的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信