Effects of Perampanel on Seizure Control, Cognition, Behavior, and Psychological Status in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.

Yi-On Fong, Poyin Huang, Chung Yao Hsu, Yuan-Han Yang
{"title":"Effects of Perampanel on Seizure Control, Cognition, Behavior, and Psychological Status in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yi-On Fong,&nbsp;Poyin Huang,&nbsp;Chung Yao Hsu,&nbsp;Yuan-Han Yang","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2022.18.6.653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Thoroughly acquainting physicians with the effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) is essential for developing appropriate therapeutic regimens for seizure management. This review summarizes the available evidence regarding patients receiving the antiseizure agent perampanel (PER) and its effects on the cognition, behavior, and psychological status of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for all relevant articles published during 2015-2021 and without any other publication limitations, and also manually searched the reference lists in the identified articles. Outcomes of interest were changes in seizure frequency relative to baseline, 50% responder rate, seizure-free rate, and retention rate (proportion of participants continuing PER at study endpoints). Safety outcomes included adverse effects and the percentage of patients experiencing effects on cognitive, psychiatric, and behavioral symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 139 studies, of which 28 were included after screening. Most studies found reduced seizure frequencies and satisfactory responder and retention rates, demonstrating the effectiveness and tolerability of PER. No negative effects were found for cognitive function, but a nonnegligible impact on aggressive behavior was noted when compared with other ASMs. Patients with previous psychiatric comorbidities had a greater risk of psychiatric side effects under PER treatment. PER induces an overall improvement in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After synthesizing the study results, PER was a safe and effective choice as an additional therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy. A comprehensive evaluation of behavior and psychiatric risk is suggested before implementing PER.</p>","PeriodicalId":324902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea)","volume":" ","pages":"653-662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/f8/jcn-18-653.PMC9669553.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2022.18.6.653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and purpose: Thoroughly acquainting physicians with the effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) is essential for developing appropriate therapeutic regimens for seizure management. This review summarizes the available evidence regarding patients receiving the antiseizure agent perampanel (PER) and its effects on the cognition, behavior, and psychological status of patients.

Methods: The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for all relevant articles published during 2015-2021 and without any other publication limitations, and also manually searched the reference lists in the identified articles. Outcomes of interest were changes in seizure frequency relative to baseline, 50% responder rate, seizure-free rate, and retention rate (proportion of participants continuing PER at study endpoints). Safety outcomes included adverse effects and the percentage of patients experiencing effects on cognitive, psychiatric, and behavioral symptoms.

Results: We identified 139 studies, of which 28 were included after screening. Most studies found reduced seizure frequencies and satisfactory responder and retention rates, demonstrating the effectiveness and tolerability of PER. No negative effects were found for cognitive function, but a nonnegligible impact on aggressive behavior was noted when compared with other ASMs. Patients with previous psychiatric comorbidities had a greater risk of psychiatric side effects under PER treatment. PER induces an overall improvement in quality of life.

Conclusions: After synthesizing the study results, PER was a safe and effective choice as an additional therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy. A comprehensive evaluation of behavior and psychiatric risk is suggested before implementing PER.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Perampanel对癫痫患者癫痫控制、认知、行为和心理状态的影响:一项系统综述。
背景和目的:充分了解抗癫痫药物(asm)的作用对于制定适当的癫痫发作治疗方案至关重要。本文综述了抗癫痫药perampanel (PER)对患者认知、行为和心理状态的影响。方法:在PubMed和Google Scholar数据库中检索2015-2021年期间发表的所有相关文章,且没有任何其他发表限制,并人工检索检索到的文章中的参考文献列表。关注的结果是癫痫发作频率相对于基线的变化、50%的应答率、无癫痫发作率和保留率(在研究终点继续PER的参与者比例)。安全性结果包括不良反应和患者在认知、精神和行为症状方面受到影响的百分比。结果:我们确定了139项研究,其中28项在筛选后纳入。大多数研究发现癫痫发作频率降低,反应率和保留率令人满意,证明了PER的有效性和耐受性。对认知功能没有负面影响,但与其他asm相比,对攻击行为有不可忽视的影响。先前有精神合并症的患者在PER治疗下出现精神副反应的风险更大。PER诱导了生活质量的全面改善。结论:综合研究结果,PER是治疗难治性癫痫的一种安全有效的选择。建议在实施PER之前对行为和精神风险进行综合评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信