Freehand power-assisted pedicle screw placement in scoliotic patients: results on 5522 consecutive pedicle screws.

Q1 Medicine
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1007/s12306-022-00754-x
C Faldini, F Barile, G Viroli, M Manzetti, M Ialuna, M Traversari, A Paolucci, A Rinaldi, G D'Antonio, A Ruffilli
{"title":"Freehand power-assisted pedicle screw placement in scoliotic patients: results on 5522 consecutive pedicle screws.","authors":"C Faldini, F Barile, G Viroli, M Manzetti, M Ialuna, M Traversari, A Paolucci, A Rinaldi, G D'Antonio, A Ruffilli","doi":"10.1007/s12306-022-00754-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pedicle screws is the current gold standard in spine surgery, achieving a solid tricolumnar fixation which is unreachable by wires and hooks. The freehand technique is the most widely adopted for pedicle screws placing. While freehand technique has been classically performed with manual tools, there has been a recent trend toward the use of power tools. However, placing a pedicle screw remains a technically demanding procedure with significant risk of complications. The aim of this article is to retrospectively evaluate safety and accuracy of free-hand power-assisted pedicle screw placement in a cohort of patients who underwent correction and fusion surgery for scoliosis (both idiopathic and non-idiopathic) in our department. A retrospective review of all patients with scoliosis who underwent surgery and received a postoperative CT scan in our department in a 9-year period was undertaken. Screw density, number and location of pedicle screws were measured using pre and postoperative full-length standing and lateral supine side-bending radiographs. Then, postoperative CT scan was used to assess the accuracy of screw placement according to Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Malpositioned screws were divided according to their displacement direction. Finally, intra and postoperative neurological complications and the need for revision of misplaced screws were recorded. A total of 205 patients were included, with a follow-up of 64.9 ± 38.67 months. All constructs were high density (average density 1.97 ± 0.04), and the average number of fusion levels was 13.72 ± 1.97. A total of 5522 screws were placed: 5308 (96.12%) were grade A, 141 (2.5%) grade B, 73 (1.32%) grade C. Neither grade D nor grade E trajectories were found. The absolute accuracy (grade A) rate was 96.12% (5308/5522) and the effective accuracy (within the safe zone, grade A + B) was 98.6% (5449/5522). Of the 73 misplaced screws (grade C), 59 were lateral (80.80%), 8 anterior (10.95%) and 6 medial (8.22%); 58 were in convexity, while 15 were in concavity (the difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.33). Intraoperatively, neither neurological nor vascular complications were recorded. Postoperatively, 4 screws needed revision (0.072% of the total): Power-assisted pedicle screw placing may be a safe an accurate technique in the scoliosis surgery, both of idiopathic and non-idiopathic etiology. Further, and higher quality, research is necessary in order to better assess the results of this relatively emerging technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10881638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-022-00754-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedicle screws is the current gold standard in spine surgery, achieving a solid tricolumnar fixation which is unreachable by wires and hooks. The freehand technique is the most widely adopted for pedicle screws placing. While freehand technique has been classically performed with manual tools, there has been a recent trend toward the use of power tools. However, placing a pedicle screw remains a technically demanding procedure with significant risk of complications. The aim of this article is to retrospectively evaluate safety and accuracy of free-hand power-assisted pedicle screw placement in a cohort of patients who underwent correction and fusion surgery for scoliosis (both idiopathic and non-idiopathic) in our department. A retrospective review of all patients with scoliosis who underwent surgery and received a postoperative CT scan in our department in a 9-year period was undertaken. Screw density, number and location of pedicle screws were measured using pre and postoperative full-length standing and lateral supine side-bending radiographs. Then, postoperative CT scan was used to assess the accuracy of screw placement according to Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Malpositioned screws were divided according to their displacement direction. Finally, intra and postoperative neurological complications and the need for revision of misplaced screws were recorded. A total of 205 patients were included, with a follow-up of 64.9 ± 38.67 months. All constructs were high density (average density 1.97 ± 0.04), and the average number of fusion levels was 13.72 ± 1.97. A total of 5522 screws were placed: 5308 (96.12%) were grade A, 141 (2.5%) grade B, 73 (1.32%) grade C. Neither grade D nor grade E trajectories were found. The absolute accuracy (grade A) rate was 96.12% (5308/5522) and the effective accuracy (within the safe zone, grade A + B) was 98.6% (5449/5522). Of the 73 misplaced screws (grade C), 59 were lateral (80.80%), 8 anterior (10.95%) and 6 medial (8.22%); 58 were in convexity, while 15 were in concavity (the difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.33). Intraoperatively, neither neurological nor vascular complications were recorded. Postoperatively, 4 screws needed revision (0.072% of the total): Power-assisted pedicle screw placing may be a safe an accurate technique in the scoliosis surgery, both of idiopathic and non-idiopathic etiology. Further, and higher quality, research is necessary in order to better assess the results of this relatively emerging technique.

脊柱侧凸患者的徒手动力辅助椎弓根螺钉置入术:5522 例连续椎弓根螺钉置入的结果。
椎弓根螺钉是目前脊柱手术的黄金标准,可实现牢固的三柱固定,这是钢丝和钩针无法达到的。椎弓根螺钉植入最广泛采用的是徒手技术。虽然徒手技术通常使用手动工具,但最近出现了使用电动工具的趋势。然而,椎弓根螺钉置入术仍然是一项技术要求高、并发症风险大的手术。本文旨在回顾性评估在我科接受脊柱侧凸(特发性和非特发性)矫正和融合手术的一组患者中,采用徒手动力辅助椎弓根螺钉置入术的安全性和准确性。我们对本科室九年内所有接受手术并接受术后 CT 扫描的脊柱侧凸患者进行了回顾性分析。使用术前和术后全长立位和侧位仰卧侧弯X光片测量椎弓根螺钉的密度、数量和位置。然后,根据 Gertzbein-Robbins 量表使用术后 CT 扫描评估螺钉放置的准确性。根据螺钉的移位方向,对定位错误的螺钉进行分类。最后,记录了术中和术后神经系统并发症以及对错位螺钉进行翻修的需求。共纳入了 205 名患者,随访时间为 64.9 ± 38.67 个月。所有结构均为高密度(平均密度为 1.97 ± 0.04),平均融合层数为 13.72 ± 1.97。共植入 5522 颗螺钉:5308枚(96.12%)为A级,141枚(2.5%)为B级,73枚(1.32%)为C级。绝对准确率(A 级)为 96.12%(5308/5522),有效准确率(安全区域内,A + B 级)为 98.6%(5449/5522)。在 73 枚错位螺钉(C 级)中,59 枚位于外侧(80.80%),8 枚位于前方(10.95%),6 枚位于内侧(8.22%);58 枚位于凸面,15 枚位于凹面(差异无统计学意义,P = 0.33)。术中未发现神经和血管并发症。术后有4枚螺钉需要翻修(占总数的0.072%):在特发性和非特发性脊柱侧弯手术中,动力辅助椎弓根螺钉置入可能是一种安全、准确的技术。为了更好地评估这项相对新兴的技术的效果,有必要开展更深入、更高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信