Muting Science: Input Overload Versus Scientific Advice in Swiss Policy Making During the Covid-19 Pandemic.

The Political Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-31 DOI:10.1111/1467-923X.13151
Klaus Armingeon, Fritz Sager
{"title":"Muting Science: Input Overload Versus Scientific Advice in Swiss Policy Making During the Covid-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Klaus Armingeon,&nbsp;Fritz Sager","doi":"10.1111/1467-923X.13151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores why the Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Parliament were reluctant to follow the majority views of the scientific epidemiological community at the beginning of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. We propose an institutionalist take on this question and argue that one major explanation could be the input overload that is characteristic of the Swiss federal political system. We define input overload as the simultaneous inputs of corporatist, pluralist, federalist and direct democratic subsystems. Adding another major input-this time from the scientific subsystem-may have threatened to further erode the government's and parliament's discretionary power to cope with the pandemic. We assume that the federal government reduced its input overload by fending off scientific advice.</p>","PeriodicalId":504210,"journal":{"name":"The Political Quarterly","volume":"93 3","pages":"424-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/ea/POQU-93-424.PMC9347449.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Political Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores why the Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Parliament were reluctant to follow the majority views of the scientific epidemiological community at the beginning of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. We propose an institutionalist take on this question and argue that one major explanation could be the input overload that is characteristic of the Swiss federal political system. We define input overload as the simultaneous inputs of corporatist, pluralist, federalist and direct democratic subsystems. Adding another major input-this time from the scientific subsystem-may have threatened to further erode the government's and parliament's discretionary power to cope with the pandemic. We assume that the federal government reduced its input overload by fending off scientific advice.

静音科学:新冠肺炎大流行期间瑞士政策制定中的输入过载与科学建议。
本文探讨了为什么瑞士联邦委员会和瑞士联邦议会在第二波Covid-19大流行开始时不愿遵循科学流行病学界的多数观点。我们提出一种制度主义的观点来看待这个问题,并认为一个主要的解释可能是瑞士联邦政治体制的特征——输入过载。我们将输入过载定义为社团主义、多元主义、联邦制和直接民主子系统的同时输入。增加另一个主要投入——这次来自科学子系统——可能会进一步削弱政府和议会在应对疫情方面的自由裁量权。我们假设联邦政府通过拒绝科学建议来减少其过度投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信