Re-Thinking Felid-Human Entanglements through the Lenses of Compassionate Conservation and Multispecies Studies.

Margarita Steinhardt, Susanne Pratt, Daniel Ramp
{"title":"Re-Thinking Felid-Human Entanglements through the Lenses of Compassionate Conservation and Multispecies Studies.","authors":"Margarita Steinhardt,&nbsp;Susanne Pratt,&nbsp;Daniel Ramp","doi":"10.3390/ani12212996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With many felid species in widespread decline, re-thinking the messy felid-human entanglements is a necessary step for fostering coexistence as current conservation frameworks centered on human exceptionalism and widespread violence toward wild animals are conspicuously failing felids. This paper argues for fostering a critical awareness of how we understand our relationships with nonhuman animals, particularly in the context of conservation. We bring two distinct but related interdisciplinary fields into a dialogue to critically question the values and conceptual assumptions that frame the practices of felid conservation today. Compassionate conservation and multispecies studies share many synergies and conceptual overlaps despite emerging from different academic domains. We identified four key areas for further exploration: (1) A shift in emphasis from practices of killing to the underlying assumptions that make forms of killing permissible and ethically unproblematic. (2) Re-engagement with individuals, not just species, in conservation settings. (3) Unsettling human exceptionalism through an emphasis on the agency of animals and an ethic involving compassion. (4) Acknowledging the ways in which humans co-become with other animals and cultivating relationships of multispecies cohabitation and flourishing.</p>","PeriodicalId":519482,"journal":{"name":"Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With many felid species in widespread decline, re-thinking the messy felid-human entanglements is a necessary step for fostering coexistence as current conservation frameworks centered on human exceptionalism and widespread violence toward wild animals are conspicuously failing felids. This paper argues for fostering a critical awareness of how we understand our relationships with nonhuman animals, particularly in the context of conservation. We bring two distinct but related interdisciplinary fields into a dialogue to critically question the values and conceptual assumptions that frame the practices of felid conservation today. Compassionate conservation and multispecies studies share many synergies and conceptual overlaps despite emerging from different academic domains. We identified four key areas for further exploration: (1) A shift in emphasis from practices of killing to the underlying assumptions that make forms of killing permissible and ethically unproblematic. (2) Re-engagement with individuals, not just species, in conservation settings. (3) Unsettling human exceptionalism through an emphasis on the agency of animals and an ethic involving compassion. (4) Acknowledging the ways in which humans co-become with other animals and cultivating relationships of multispecies cohabitation and flourishing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过富有同情心的保护和多物种研究的镜头重新思考猫与人的纠缠。
随着许多猫科动物物种的广泛减少,重新思考混乱的猫科动物与人类的纠缠是促进共存的必要步骤,因为当前的保护框架以人类例外论和对野生动物的普遍暴力为中心,显然正在使猫科动物失败。本文主张培养一种批判性意识,即我们如何理解我们与非人类动物的关系,特别是在保护的背景下。我们将两个截然不同但相关的跨学科领域带入对话,以批判性地质疑构成当今野外保护实践的价值观和概念假设。同情保护和多物种研究尽管来自不同的学术领域,但有许多协同作用和概念重叠。我们确定了四个需要进一步探索的关键领域:(1)将重点从杀戮的实践转移到使杀戮形式被允许并且在道德上没有问题的潜在假设。(2)在保护环境中与个体(而不仅仅是物种)重新接触。(3)通过强调动物的能动性和涉及同情的伦理来颠覆人类例外论。(4)认识到人类与其他动物共同发展的方式,培养多物种共存和繁荣的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信