A randomized controlled trial to study the effect of intratracheal and intravenous lignocaine on airway and hemodynamic response during emergence and extubation following general anesthesia.

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Northern Clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2022-09-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2021.33407
Divya V Gladston, Sudha Padmam, Rajasree Omanakutty Amma, Rachel Cherian Koshy, K M Jagathnath Krishna, Jayasree Vijayan, Nimmy George, Praveen Rajendran
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial to study the effect of intratracheal and intravenous lignocaine on airway and hemodynamic response during emergence and extubation following general anesthesia.","authors":"Divya V Gladston,&nbsp;Sudha Padmam,&nbsp;Rajasree Omanakutty Amma,&nbsp;Rachel Cherian Koshy,&nbsp;K M Jagathnath Krishna,&nbsp;Jayasree Vijayan,&nbsp;Nimmy George,&nbsp;Praveen Rajendran","doi":"10.14744/nci.2021.33407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intratracheal (IT) and intravenous (IV) lignocaine suppress airway reflex and hemodynamic response during extubation, but studies regarding this are sparse. The primary aim was to compare the effect of IT and IV lignocaine on attenuation of airway reflex to endotracheal extubation and the secondary aim was to compare the hemodynamic responses to extubation, using lignocaine by the two different routes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five female patients with comparable age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status undergoing carcinoma breast surgery were randomized into three groups. Group A received 2% lignocaine 3 mg/kg intratracheally 5 min and Group B received 2% lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg intravenously 3 min before extubation. Group C was control group. The airway and hemodynamic responses were noted in terms of episodes of cough during emergence and extubation. Categorical variables assessed using Fisher's exact test and continuous variables assessed using one-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cough suppression was present in Groups A and B, with better results observed with IT than with IV lignocaine. In the control group, Grade III cough reflex was present predominantly. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) in blood pressure and heart rate between Group A versus Group C and in Group B versus Group C, but not between Group A and Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IT lignocaine administered before extubation significantly attenuates post-extubation cough reflex than IV lignocaine. Both IT and IV lignocaine can effectively attenuate the airway and hemodynamic response to extubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19164,"journal":{"name":"Northern Clinics of Istanbul","volume":"9 4","pages":"323-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/4d/NCI-9-323.PMC9514071.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2021.33407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intratracheal (IT) and intravenous (IV) lignocaine suppress airway reflex and hemodynamic response during extubation, but studies regarding this are sparse. The primary aim was to compare the effect of IT and IV lignocaine on attenuation of airway reflex to endotracheal extubation and the secondary aim was to compare the hemodynamic responses to extubation, using lignocaine by the two different routes.

Methods: Seventy-five female patients with comparable age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status undergoing carcinoma breast surgery were randomized into three groups. Group A received 2% lignocaine 3 mg/kg intratracheally 5 min and Group B received 2% lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg intravenously 3 min before extubation. Group C was control group. The airway and hemodynamic responses were noted in terms of episodes of cough during emergence and extubation. Categorical variables assessed using Fisher's exact test and continuous variables assessed using one-way analysis of variance.

Results: Cough suppression was present in Groups A and B, with better results observed with IT than with IV lignocaine. In the control group, Grade III cough reflex was present predominantly. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) in blood pressure and heart rate between Group A versus Group C and in Group B versus Group C, but not between Group A and Group B.

Conclusion: IT lignocaine administered before extubation significantly attenuates post-extubation cough reflex than IV lignocaine. Both IT and IV lignocaine can effectively attenuate the airway and hemodynamic response to extubation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项随机对照试验,研究全身麻醉后急诊和拔管时气管内和静脉注射利多卡因对气道和血流动力学反应的影响。
目的:利多卡因气管内(IT)和静脉内(IV)抑制拔管时气道反射和血流动力学反应,但相关研究较少。主要目的是比较静脉注射和静脉注射利多卡因对气管内拔管时气道反射衰减的影响,次要目的是比较两种不同途径使用利多卡因拔管时的血流动力学反应。方法:75例年龄、体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会体质状况相当的女性乳腺癌手术患者随机分为三组。A组在拔管前5min,静脉滴注2%利多卡因3 mg/kg, B组在拔管前3min,静脉滴注2%利多卡因1.5 mg/kg。C组为对照组。气道和血流动力学反应被记录在急诊和拔管期间的咳嗽发作。分类变量使用Fisher精确检验评估,连续变量使用单向方差分析评估。结果:A组和B组均有止咳作用,且应用IT组止咳效果优于静脉注射利多卡因组。对照组以III级咳嗽反射为主。结论:拔管前给予利多卡因比静脉注射利多卡因能明显减轻拔管后咳嗽反射。体外注射和静脉注射利多卡因均能有效减弱拔管后气道和血流动力学反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Northern Clinics of Istanbul
Northern Clinics of Istanbul MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信